What I suspect is all these pages are born from a single template and google will easily be able to just ban them all as spam in fairly short-order. Like I suggested above, this sounds like an incredibly risk business plan.
To be honest, this sounds a lot like the (keyword)hq.com sites and spam to me. There is no legitimate need for 1500 domains on such narrow topics owned by 1 party, IMHO.
Sounds like he's going to be using goarticles content on separate domains. Be tthat'll rank high. i wonder if google will create a filter for you to no count any interlinking, probably wouldn't be hard. *content.com->*content.com no link count. Filter DONE.
First of all, this may seem to be a huge affair to keep the spam out and the quality, fresh content in - we do agree it seems like an impossible task! But the only way to post to these 1500 sites is through a single portal - the software that backs this has been in development for the last year with a team of programmers. They have successfully produced a program that: A) checks for spelling and grammer errrors B) checks the content for originality through 6 different search engines and a couple of already available services on the web that checks this for you. This will check all the way down to the paragraph level. Second, we have spent 1 year developing relationships with authors/publishers who wish to get themselves known on the net. There is also a huge group on the internet who are trying to establish themselves on the internet as experts - thus they write researched articles - this creates traffic for their site/blog/adsense site ... many people have already been writing these and submitted them to us to publish to the tune of 34,000 articles so far. Next, we have several paid article submission services that have professional writers paying to have their articles published on the web... these paid publishing services have approached us and asked us for permission to post their quality fresh content to our site- they already have safeguards in place to check the articles, plus when the service submits to our site it is checked again with our systems. We also have a team of 350 Professionals who will be submitting to these sites on a weekly basis, adding fresh new content weekly. Upon launch, the directories will be filled with 250,000 pages. This has been the combined efforts of a team who has worked to roll this project out for over a year...but, I guess where the real proof is in the pudding, so to speak, is if it were not realistic, would some of the Top Internet Marketers on the net have checked our system out and joined our team? Being that reputation is everything in their feild,I would think they would run the other way...because they would lose their HUGE lists by being involved in a SPAM DUMP, right? Well I am here to tell you that over 10 Top Internet Marketers have join us to date .. some of the People include Richard Driver, Willie Crawford , Mike Ambrosio , Dennis Wagoner and many others ... As far as risk? Millionaires generally dont lose money, they are milionaires because they know a good thing and jump on it. If this were too great of a risk, I would think that several millionaires would not be backing us... Last, but not least...The man who is the marketing wiz behind this concept for years has owned one of the largest marketing firms in Europe with 220 employees, has been listed in Fortune 500, Time Magazine, Forbes and several other magazines as one of the best in his field. He has had exclusive rights with companies such as Levis, Harley Davidson, Stena Cruise Lines , Glasmagasina and many more, not to mention he is the founder and creator of the clothes we all wear today ... B.U.M. Equipment Clothing line, which is on the backs of over 250 million people around the world. People of this caliber woudn't waste their time if this wasn't realistic. Hope this answers your questions in a more definitive manner. I appreciate the skepticism. I was skeptic when I was first approached with this, and skepticism is healthy. It is what keeps you from rushing into things without research. Cheers, Scott
You invest so damn much in software and have the ugliest logos I've ever seen. Some people get lucky and have crappy shirt sell for a while. Haven't seen a bum shirt in years. Hell even the founders of Enron are rich as hell, millionaires and billionaires invested in it. Companies backed by VCs fail all the time. It is calculated risk. I don’t see this being an 8 figure idea but maybe if you clean it up it will be. I would start by making all the sites on the same domain and take on about.com or make them all look different.
Your incorrect, aeiouy, this is done with a Dynamic Template that changes...but we have built this with Google in mind a we have corresponded with them as to find out how they would like us to do it. Guess what...We have Google's Approval.
Due to the attacking type resonses in this thread such as I will no longer answer be answering these hateful type of comments. I tried earlier to get this thread returned to the original intent of the starter, to see how many Sites people have. That is what the thread needs to address, because that is what it was started for. All I wanted to do was answer this question. I am happy to have been able to answer questions for you, but in doing so, I feel that we are being Unfairly Attacked for no reason. If you don't think what we are attempting will work, find...just stand back and watch. Regards, Scott
Scott, have you guys tried this on a small scale to judge the benefits yet? If so what were the result of these, I presume they were good thats why you went ahead with all them domains,
We have tested this and yes the benefits/results were great. This is why we spent the greatest part of the past year on launching such a large project. Again, it is not designed only for AdSense though. There are more revenue streams involved. AdSense is just a part of the revenue. Thanks, Scott
Seems like a $398 ebook with "bonus" access to 1500 websites, and you need to sign a NDA to buy it. Intresting concept..
Nope, you couldn't be farther from the truth on that one. The ebook pictures at the bottom are only of future product offerings. Really read the site and you will understand more.
If the program/software works as he says it will and yields 2-3 sites that are successful in bringing in customers for their $398 ebook (in addition to the thousands of pageviews/ad impressions/clicks)... this can be successful. All it takes is for 2-3 sites to be mega-popular. Good luck. P.S. I have 4 sites on AdSense. Stuart
First I would like to thank you for the well-reasoned response. Not that I am likely going to agree with you on some things, but I think you at least have an understanding of what you are doing. I got to be honest... I don't get this one. There are so many outlets for writers with the internet now, I don't believe you can just get enough writers for 1500 sites to just "donate" their original content to you. There is no need to become known. You can become known in better ways than donating your content to a site such as this. So continue to count me skeptical on you being able to acquire enough original content to pull this off. This is where I think the bulk of the content is going to come from. If that is the case, I wish you guys just wouldn't do it. Nothing wrong with aritcle submission sites and the redistribution of content. But it should be used to fill out the rough edges of content for a site with its own unique content. If your only content is going to be duplicate content, then your site is just spam. And like I said above, I just don't see you being able to get enough unique content for free. People pay money for unique articles. You are unlikely to get any substantial inventory for no cost. Who is paying them? How much are they being paid. 350 is a lot. Why are you submitting your content to article submission sites? Doesn't that just make your unique content duplicate content? So you achieve 100% duplicate content on all your sites? Do you have any plans to have any unique content specific to your 1500 sites? Unfortunately yeah, as there is still a lot of money to be made from gaming the search engines and spaming the net with duplicate content. I know how long it takes to generate a single page of decent unique content. You could not have done it in a year unless you spent a ridiculous amount of money. So they only answer is you are just rehashing and borrowing other content. I am guessing this top internet marketers are already spammers themselves. So no, why would they run the other way. It is business as usual. The phrase Internet Marketer makes my skin crawl. It certainly doesn't invoke images of someone who pumps out solid content for internet users. I wish you would have hooked up with over 10 of the top internet publishers. Marketers sell stuff, publishers create stuff. I would much rather see you create something then sell nothing. Going to be straight up honest, I have no idea who any of these people are.. Not that is any shock or suprise. Yup. Nobody who has ever made money has lost it. Especially those whose business involves taking advantage of circumstances and people to make money. Yeah that is the problem though.. He is a marketer... The web really doesn't need more marketers.. and it certainly doesn't need marketers publishing massive web sites. It needs people who know how to produce unique content and desitinations for visitors and provide valuable and/or useful information. The fact that the only people involved in this enterprise are marketers tells me it is nothing but an attempt to game the system. We will see.. show us the content. Regardless.. good luck with this.. I will be curious to see what it really is when it launches.
Actually, what spraven is doing is a nice ideea.... i wish i had funds and the idea to start something like that. Even if he would let anyone put articles free on all his sites, it's still a nice idea. Though, what I don't want to imagine is how long and what resources would be involved to optimize 1500 sites for specific keywords.
I would throw in from a branding standpoint the 1500 domains with the word content in it doesn't seem like a very good idea. A single domain with a brandable identity would make much more sense. I don't see you being able to succesfully convince people to append the word content on to their particular item of interest. By the way I see one of the examples is adsensecontent.com and doubleadsense.com What the heck is doubleadsense? And if you used that kind of selection in your examples, how inclusive is your actual 1500 site keyword list? I am pretty sure I could run off 1500 relevant keywords off the top of my head before I got stuck with doubleadsense. Especially since the phrase doubleadsense doesn't even really mean anything.