How lazy can you be when it comes to writing articles for sites?

Discussion in 'Link Development' started by Flamerid, May 21, 2010.

  1. #1
    Can you just take another article reword it in your own words and lay it out in a different structure? Or will Google notice the connection? Also, will sites like ezine ban you if you just reword another article already on your site? I'm not referring to article spinning either. Right now, my method is to use two articles as a reference and combine both contents in my own words/structure.

    The question is, exactly how lazy can you be with this? Right now it's taking me way too long to write articles.. 90-120 minutes per 1,000 word article.
     
    Flamerid, May 21, 2010 IP
  2. Mr.Submit

    Mr.Submit Active Member

    Messages:
    301
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    85
    #2
    Most lazy graps articles from another sites and publish to his site without modification.
    Second buys article from another writer.
    Third lazy uses rewriter tools.

    I am at third ... :D
     
    Mr.Submit, May 21, 2010 IP
  3. Joe128139

    Joe128139 Peon

    Messages:
    282
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    If you want to be as lazy as possible, you are going to need to outsource your writing. It can be pretty cheap and is very effective if you don't like to write. Otherwise, writing a good article will take around your timeline, 1-2 hours.
     
    Joe128139, May 21, 2010 IP
  4. Caragui

    Caragui Peon

    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    Outsorucing may be your best bet. This way you can have a unique artucle which you have full rights on. It is however costlier tha writing your own content.
     
    Caragui, May 21, 2010 IP
  5. Mykonos

    Mykonos Member

    Messages:
    29
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    #5
    You can hire a writer on elance which can save you lots of time. Then you can turn one article into many by spinning them with software like TheBestSpinner. The more unique your articles are the more of them will stick.
     
    Mykonos, May 22, 2010 IP
  6. MarkAse

    MarkAse Peon

    Messages:
    596
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    I'd outsource it before taking either of the other available options. But, yes outside of the human edited directories you can certainly republish the exact same article elsewhere.

    I usually link back to the original ezine article though since that's what a blog owner would normally do. Plus, that seems to help the original ezine article rank really, really well.
     
    MarkAse, May 22, 2010 IP
  7. Zor Prime

    Zor Prime Peon

    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    Usually reading a portion of the story or a paragraph (sentence if you're extremely lazy) and then rewording it into your own words is a good bet to get past any alarms that might be sounded by Google or eZine.

    Just don't write anything in the same fashion as the original, be creative. If you have to, do it in reverse to the original. Or completely remove a point being talked about to a different section of the article.

    Mix it up, but don't sacrifice quality. Quality counts. It has to be readable, understandable to the person reading it.
     
    Zor Prime, May 22, 2010 IP
  8. akki313

    akki313 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,313
    Likes Received:
    330
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    155
    #8
    It depends for what purpose I need the article., Generally for ezine submissions and writing for my clients I used to read 5-6 articles and then write completely unique article on it. But for building backlinks to my site I just take an article and rewrite it to make 100% unique and then submit it to various article directories except ezine and other web2.0 properties..
     
    akki313, May 24, 2010 IP