How does no follow work?

Discussion in 'Google' started by alvalong, Apr 27, 2007.

  1. #1
    Could you explain me how it work?
     
    alvalong, Apr 27, 2007 IP
  2. bacanze

    bacanze Peon

    Messages:
    2,419
    Likes Received:
    127
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    Basically Google ignores the links are doesnt count them as a backlink.
     
    bacanze, Apr 27, 2007 IP
  3. boldy

    boldy Peon

    Messages:
    561
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  4. Noj

    Noj Peon

    Messages:
    81
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    yes he is correct the spiders do not either count or follow the link.
     
    Noj, Apr 27, 2007 IP
  5. yogesh sarkar

    yogesh sarkar Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,740
    Likes Received:
    75
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #5
    These days yahoo and msn are also doing the same
     
    yogesh sarkar, Apr 27, 2007 IP
  6. Noj

    Noj Peon

    Messages:
    81
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    agreed its all search enignes
     
    Noj, Apr 27, 2007 IP
  7. Cypherus

    Cypherus Peon

    Messages:
    1,551
    Likes Received:
    102
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    nofollow is a way of not sharing your link-love :]
     
    Cypherus, Apr 27, 2007 IP
  8. brealmz

    brealmz Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    335
    Likes Received:
    24
    Best Answers:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    138
    #8
    im also one of those people confused about "no follow" and following this issue. but IMHO(correct me if im wrong) search engine will either change, already changed or also confused how to treat no-follow.(maybe with secrecy)
    Why?
    most webmaster or SEO or maybe some of those who implement nofollow consider it was a failure. why again?
    most links with nofollow links are coming from trusted websites(e.g. wikipedia, comments on blog from legitimate websites)
    also captcha was widely implemented now and nofollow was less applicable for spammers.
    i hope to hear more opinion from DP users.
     
    brealmz, Apr 27, 2007 IP
  9. trichnosis

    trichnosis Prominent Member

    Messages:
    13,785
    Likes Received:
    333
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    300
  10. donttrustthisposter

    donttrustthisposter Peon

    Messages:
    1,477
    Likes Received:
    91
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    Not necessarily as I've seen backlinks from nofollows counted by MSN.
     
    donttrustthisposter, Apr 27, 2007 IP
  11. yogesh sarkar

    yogesh sarkar Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,740
    Likes Received:
    75
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #11
    yogesh sarkar, Apr 27, 2007 IP
  12. brealmz

    brealmz Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    335
    Likes Received:
    24
    Best Answers:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    138
    #12
    it was from 2005 back when search engines was giving an importance to nofollow
    also i dont trust that much to matt cutt. he was one of those who implement the rules and rules change overtime. IMHO(again) he was allowed to talked only for what he was only allowed.
     
    brealmz, Apr 27, 2007 IP
  13. Pierce

    Pierce Active Member

    Messages:
    634
    Likes Received:
    26
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    95
    #13
    no follow says to the search engine "dont follow this page", they still look at the pages it links to (you can track it by watching google download your site), for me i noticed google no longer followed the link.

    nofollow also does not allow the link to pass on PR to that page is linking to, and you can use it to retain PR (prevent PR leakage).

    Thats why google suggests for posts on blogs you have nofollow, so spamming is less attractive.

    As for the other search engines im not sure, but ask.com ignores it fully and will crawl whatever it wants.

    Pierce
     
    Pierce, Apr 27, 2007 IP
  14. grg

    grg Guest

    Messages:
    2,692
    Likes Received:
    73
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14

    That's right. Not only less attractibe but even useless. Almost.
     
    grg, Apr 27, 2007 IP
  15. trapikmedia

    trapikmedia Peon

    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    NO FOLLOW
    - the Search Engine will not pass Link Juice (for Page Rank building purposes)
    - the Search Engine will still index the link/URL
     
    trapikmedia, Aug 24, 2009 IP
  16. lindamood1

    lindamood1 Active Member

    Messages:
    1,705
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    78
    #16
    no follow help in link popularity only
     
    lindamood1, Aug 24, 2009 IP
  17. trapikmedia

    trapikmedia Peon

    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #17
    nofollow is most useful for shaping PageRank.
     
    trapikmedia, Sep 7, 2009 IP
  18. Brandon_R

    Brandon_R Peon

    Messages:
    330
    Likes Received:
    11
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #18
    If you add the rel attirbute rel="nofollow" to your urls bots won't follow it and pagerank wont leak.
     
    Brandon_R, Sep 7, 2009 IP
  19. andylin

    andylin Guest

    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #19
    All this is normal, don't worry about it
     
    andylin, Sep 7, 2009 IP
  20. JosephineCarns

    JosephineCarns Peon

    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #20
    They are useless. If you are linking to no-follow sites Google will never count it as a backlink.
     
    JosephineCarns, Sep 7, 2009 IP