how does googles related: query work?

Discussion in 'Google' started by Gazzerman, Oct 24, 2005.

  1. #1
    Gazzerman, Oct 24, 2005 IP
  2. mdvaldosta

    mdvaldosta Peon

    Messages:
    4,079
    Likes Received:
    362
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    I'd like to know this as well
     
    mdvaldosta, Oct 24, 2005 IP
  3. mjewel

    mjewel Prominent Member

    Messages:
    6,693
    Likes Received:
    514
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #3
    Per google:

    related:

    The query [related:] will list web pages that are "similar" to a specified web page. For instance, [related:www.google.com] will list web pages that are similar to the Google homepage. Note there can be no space between the "related:" and the web page url.

    This functionality is also accessible by clicking on the "Similar Pages" link on Google's main results page, and from the Advanced Search page, under Page Specific Search > Similar.


    It will also return sites that link to you, although it isn't entirely accurate.
     
    mjewel, Oct 24, 2005 IP
  4. digitalpoint

    digitalpoint Overlord of no one Staff

    Messages:
    38,334
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    Best Answers:
    462
    Trophy Points:
    710
    Digital Goods:
    29
    #4
    It's not very accurate at all. It's strictly based on links as far as I know.
     
    digitalpoint, Oct 24, 2005 IP
  5. frankm

    frankm Active Member

    Messages:
    915
    Likes Received:
    63
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    83
    #5
    They way they have implemented is: if some site links to site A and B on the same page (or part of the page) they must have something do to with eachother. If you have 1000's of pages linking to yahoo.com, google.com and search.msn.com they are probably related.

    try a related: search for one of the big co-op sites, you'll see they are 'related' to other heavy weight co-op sites, according to google..
     
    frankm, Oct 24, 2005 IP
  6. harris2004

    harris2004 Peon

    Messages:
    103
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    most of my related links are the ones i link to or those who are linking to me and some strange websites that are totally offtopic to my website.
     
    harris2004, Oct 24, 2005 IP
  7. mjewel

    mjewel Prominent Member

    Messages:
    6,693
    Likes Received:
    514
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #7
    Accurate no, but it returns results from totally unrelated sites that aren't running co-op and no link to my site shows on the page or cache. I can't think of any value to using the feature.
     
    mjewel, Oct 24, 2005 IP
  8. Gazzerman

    Gazzerman Active Member

    Messages:
    570
    Likes Received:
    16
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #8
    The only reason I tried the related feature was to see If my site was being categorised in the correct way. i.e. did google recognise my site was an automotive one?
     
    Gazzerman, Oct 24, 2005 IP
  9. aeiouy

    aeiouy Peon

    Messages:
    2,876
    Likes Received:
    275
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    Yeah if anything else is factored, links are over-riding.. When I had few links to a particular site, I had one from a site that was very unrelated, and it showed up as related because it was one of only a few links.
     
    aeiouy, Oct 24, 2005 IP
  10. frankm

    frankm Active Member

    Messages:
    915
    Likes Received:
    63
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    83
    #10
    to sum it up: the related: queries are useless
     
    frankm, Oct 24, 2005 IP
  11. neha_patelx9x

    neha_patelx9x Peon

    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    i would agree as well :)
     
    neha_patelx9x, Oct 24, 2005 IP
  12. Gazzerman

    Gazzerman Active Member

    Messages:
    570
    Likes Received:
    16
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #12
    That does seem apparent, cheers everyone :)
     
    Gazzerman, Oct 25, 2005 IP