I just want to see "Americans ACTION (Current Admin)" on IRAN. Rather than wasting TIME dealing with UN. WHY these people are pushing SANCTIONS...AFTER SANCTIONS? Answer is EASY
Cupid, were you talking about ahmadeenaspunk's threat to wipe Israel off the map? Granted, this is what most muslims want. Or that Iran is continuously ignoring the UN (like the UN could do more than craft a letter these days) and other nations to halt their nuclear weapons program?
I don't have a problem with Iran having a nuke. I also don't have a problem with Israel taking care of Iran with no punitive actions. If they get a nuke - they can't launch one at us. How will they get it across the Ocean? If they do, through our port security? If they do - why did we re-elect Bush? I can't wait for doomsday and the end of the world. I await it with open arms and a small bobble head next to my lawn chair in my sunglasses to shield my eyes from the blast.
I don't think Iran will be any safer just because its nuclear armed. I just think it means if anyone wants to attack them then they will have to completely wipe them off the face of the earth - i.e. nuke them into oblivion. I don't think this equates to greater safety.
Nukes assured the MAD policy with the USSR. Mutual Assured Destruction - it hasn't been long since we are at the edge of oblivion. And for shame, using an insensitive remark like that in an massive generalization.
they cant stop the mexicans getting in, so you think they can stop a nuke? you're a fucking idiot iran having a nuke will guarantee attacking someone.
Port security is indeed useless is protecting against a nuclear attack. The smart attack is just to sail a small private vessel up to the shore of a major American city (D.C. and NYC seem to be favorites), beach the craft, and set off the bomb. If you happen to get stopped before you get to shore, it's not a big deal -- nuclear weapons have range. Nuclear bombs just aren't that big and the oceans are covered with private vessels. There is, quite literally, no defense against this sort of attack. All those who say "why should we worry, the Iranians don't have missiles that can reach us" are either dishonest or really really stupid.
I'm really glad of the ignore option, until someone quotes them, like Will just did. Take samantha pia, her (or is it his? ) language is even worse than mine. Continually abusing people and swearing like a trooper. At least I swear with aplomb.
well i guess you have to put the people that quote me on ignore too. Will, people like Always Gay Sex and the other idiot Jackhole are the real danger to the west. no brains, no IQ above a shoe size, blind to reality, and so passive i really question their sexuality too. they are the people to worry about. AGS is just a post whore, nothing more
sad thing is, he had to put me on ignore to take that screen shot, AGS dont like the thought of me talking about him, so he has to read what i post
I agree with this to a certain extent. i would prefer they go nuclear so the radiation footprint seeking MOAB..can just obliterate a few populated acres of land. This is what they want, I don't understand why GW won't give it to 'em. Well he still has a few months to work this into the agenda...Happy Hunting GW.
Thanks for questioning my sexuality and calling me yet another name- the fifth or sixth time- this proves a maturity level that I will leave up to the reader to decide. You insist on insulting my intelligence, and my sexuality (which is heterosexual - not that is any of your business). What's next, death threats? Come off it - my personal life is none of your business and what you think about me isn't relevant in a discussion topic. You don't know me, and to pretend to just shows back on you, and your character. Resorting to ad-hominem attacks is one of the logical fallacies you have chosen to use against me among others - and it serves no one. I know you are attempting to bait me, and I am above that. Deal with it. My comments in regard to Bush and his administration's ability to protect the people still stands in its original context of irony/cynicism, and remains so. If they nuke us it is his fault for it, and his leadership abilities should be stripped, followed by a trial for overall incompetence during his tenure in office.
This is not how your so called "real world" works. If you cannot stifle the urges to insult people personally then perhaps it would be best if you had some form of counseling for your anger management issues. I dare say your behavior has been quite unbecoming and the contrite nature of it is very vulgar. In the real world such situations would lead you to fights with people - and by all means I mean verbal attacks. I have not yet once called you a name, called you anything, or insinuated that you were anything - and yet you absolutely insist upon insulting me personally! Slanderous remarks get you nowhere in arguments.
I can't wait till Iran gets f*cked up, they brought it on themselves, then all the left wing nutters who think is cool Iran has nuclear weapons can all whine & cry on each others shoulders about how bad the USA is lmao