How can you find out the current PR, and not the Toolbar PR?

Discussion in 'Google' started by adsensenewb, Apr 6, 2006.

  1. #1
    Are there any sites, tools, or software that can show the current PR of a page?

    I hear that google can take months to update its toolbar PR. Is this true?
     
    adsensenewb, Apr 6, 2006 IP
  2. jfontestad

    jfontestad Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,236
    Likes Received:
    20
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    148
    #2
    Toolbar PR is the current PR that Google has publicly displayed for viewers to see. Their is no way of seeing CURRENT PR unless you work at Google or know someone that will tell it to you I guess.

    Check my sig link for a few PR tools.
     
    jfontestad, Apr 6, 2006 IP
  3. Kngavl

    Kngavl Peon

    Messages:
    964
    Likes Received:
    26
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    Yes there are services that may show futurepageranks and current ones too.
    http://www.futurepagerank.net/
    But it's only a prediction tool.
    Also there is
    http://www.prchecker.info/check_page_rank.php
     
    Kngavl, Apr 6, 2006 IP
  4. Keone

    Keone Peon

    Messages:
    232
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    Does not work anymore I think.
     
    Keone, Apr 7, 2006 IP
  5. payoutwindow

    payoutwindow Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    788
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    110
    #5
    I agree with jfontestad .. the only other way would be to work for google.
     
    payoutwindow, Apr 7, 2006 IP
  6. jhonson

    jhonson Peon

    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    i also agree with jfontestad .
     
    jhonson, Apr 7, 2006 IP
  7. FireStorM

    FireStorM Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,579
    Likes Received:
    88
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    175
    #7
    Well there are many sites which has tool to predict future PR , but PR is not essential at all to rank well.
     
    FireStorM, Apr 7, 2006 IP
  8. boohlick

    boohlick Banned

    Messages:
    736
    Likes Received:
    22
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    boohlick, Apr 7, 2006 IP
  9. kkibak

    kkibak Peon

    Messages:
    1,083
    Likes Received:
    78
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    actually it doesn't work anymore:
     
    kkibak, Apr 7, 2006 IP
  10. forumcare

    forumcare Peon

    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    from what I see the whole PR thing is currently in limbo, hopefully they will all stabilize and show the same results soon.
     
    forumcare, Apr 7, 2006 IP
  11. Komodo Tale

    Komodo Tale Peon

    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    Future PageRank prediction tools use very simple algorithms that make their predictions, for the most part, based on the links you have. There may be some other factors thrown in, but link quantity and the PR of those links are the two overwhelming factors.

    In the real world, Google PageRank is logarithmic, based on the total number of links in the Google index. That means that if you have the exact same links from one update to the next and the total number of links indexed by Google goes up your PageRank could go down. Transversely, if the total number of links indexed by Google goes down your PageRank could go up.

    Obviously there are a lot of other factors in play here, but the bottom line is that there is no way for PageRank prediction tools to accurately include the growth of the Internet into their equations unless the tools are themselves utilizing accurate sampling technology.
     
    Komodo Tale, Apr 7, 2006 IP
  12. mihy

    mihy Peon

    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    You can check this web based tools.
    www.websolucing.com
    www.googlerankings.com
    www.webconfs.com
     
    mihy, Apr 12, 2006 IP
  13. corinaw

    corinaw Not Banned

    Messages:
    486
    Likes Received:
    69
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    The current page rank is not available any longer. I't seems pretty certain the current rank was displayed for "a bit",

    But according to matt cutts, the current page rank was turned off, and will not be turned back on.

    IMO we had a bit of insight into future page rank, but the party is over!

    -------------------------------


    http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/page/2/

    Q: “Is the RK parameter turned off, or should we expect to see it again?”
    A: I wouldn’t expect to see the RK parameter have a non-zero value again.

    Q: “What’s an RK parameter?”
    A: It’s a parameter that you could see in a Google toolbar query. Some people outside of Google had speculated that it was live PageRank, that PageRank differed between Bigdaddy and the older infrastructure, etc.
     
    corinaw, Apr 12, 2006 IP
  14. Seiya

    Seiya Peon

    Messages:
    4,666
    Likes Received:
    404
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    If your site is listed in DMOZ the biggest secret is that your live PR is listed in google directory ;)

    I found this pretty accurate... before it predicted my site as PR5 (down from PR6) and hey it happened... now after hard work it predicts my site as PR6 again... and i think next update i will get my PR6 back :)
     
    Seiya, Apr 12, 2006 IP
  15. BrianR2

    BrianR2 Guest

    Messages:
    734
    Likes Received:
    24
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    In my experience, those pr predictors don't seem to work that well. Some of them are based on some query results that people are speculating has to do with the real page rank. I've emailed a company that made one of these tools that uses this query result and didn't get any response. I suspect that they didn't really know the answer.
     
    BrianR2, Apr 12, 2006 IP