Very Big, i think there are universe inside our micro micro microscopic atomic cell that has a world it self. And we are living inside Atomic microscopic micro cell of God.
My big questions about God and the Afterlife, on both sides. Are they unanswerable? Here are some big questions I have about God and the Afterlife. Has anyone else ever asked these questions? Can there ever be an answer to them? Or are they forever unanswerable and shrouded in mystery? 1. If there is a God, why doesn't he physically come out so that EVERYONE can see him anytime, making himself an objective physical person, to settle the dispute over his existence? Why all the mystery and hide-and-seek, leaving everyone guessing and speculating? Why can't he appear to everyone like he did to Moses as a pillar of fire in the movie "The Ten Commandments", instead of a select few who are sometimes not even credible or sane? 2. If there is life after death, then why don't the deceased return to visit their loved ones or the living in a CONSISTENT reliable unambiguous direct manner? Why do they only allegedly appear to only some of their loved ones through dreams, sensations or feelings, ghostly experiences, or signs and omens? Why not directly in full form that is clearly visible to the naked eye and can be seen by anyone, like the way Ben Kenobi visited Luke Skywalker in his afterlife form in Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi? Analysis and sub-questions: Christians like to excuse the first question by claiming that even if God did physically appear, most heathens on earth would not believe him anyway. But that is a total copout, and completely false too. People usually believe what they see with their eyes, especially once it appears. For example, in the movie Independence Day, when alien fighters were attacking and ravaging the whole Earth, no one denied the existence of aliens anymore, they were an established fact by then. Or they say that God is not appearing to test our faith in him, another lame copout which makes no sense. Why doesn't he just appear to settle the dispute over his existence? But on the other hand, Atheists have not fully explained away the things that point to the existence of God: a) Miracles and answered prayers happen all the time among so many, sometimes with such detail, that cannot be explained by coincidence alone. b) The Intelligent Design argument has never been completely debunked, only nitpicked at. So much in creation, from stars to atoms, and especially living organisms, indicate an elaborate, intricate, and efficient order design. In fact, some reputable scientists have compared the chances of life evolving on Earth by random mutations to be less probable or equivalent to the probability of a group of monkeys typing randomly at typewriters for millions of years and coming up with "The Complete Works of William Shakespeare", or the odds that a tornado could blow through a junkyard and randomly put together a complete functional 747 jumbo jet. Such would be beyond astronomical. c) And of course, many who have had a Near Death Experience claim to have encountered God face to face. So what can we make of all this? Could our whole notion of what God is be wrong? And thus the assumptions in these questions here be in error too? Regarding life after death, some spiritualists have proposed that a barrier exists between our world and that of the afterlife dimension that prevents the departed from contacting us easily or directly. However, even if that were so, you'd think that out of the countless millions on Earth who have died, that at least a few of them would have found a way to contact the living directly and unambiguously to make their afterlife existence an objective fact right? Why only through dreams, signs and omens, or sudden feelings/sensations. So why haven't they? Or perhaps consciousness is completely vanquished at death? After all, during anesthesia, a patient's consciousness loses its existence momentarily until the patient regains consciousness, to the point that not even dreams occur. So doesn't that mean that consciousness can lose its own existence too? (at least consciousness as we know it) Some spiritualists argue that since matter cannot be destroyed, but only go through a change in form, that consciousness can't be destroyed either. But even if that were so, and consciousness simply changed its form to something else, it doesn't automatically follow that awareness cannot be vanquished, as it seemingly does with the experience of patients in anesthesia. After all, it has not been established that awareness itself is a form of matter. If it were merely a by-product of matter (the brain), wouldn't it be possible for it to be extinquished? On the other hand, if there is no life after death, then what about the widespread reports of ghostly experiences all over the world all throughout history? Surely countless millions of experiences everywhere throughout all history can't be 100 percent all wrong or mistaken? But even if ghosts were proven to be real, that would not prove that they are the spirits or consciousness of people who have passed away. They could be interdimensional beings, a different type of lifeform, projections from the consciousness of the living, etc. Near Death Experiences, although a fascinating phenomenon, may point to the possible existence of a life after death, but they are highly controversial and personal, and certainly not conclusive proof nor universally testable or verifiable. However, the unwavering conviction and knowing of many experiencers that their experience was real and absolute proof of life after death to them, is quite fascinating. And reincarnation, a highly fascinating subject, is mainly backed by circumstantial evidence. There are many compelling cases that have been documented and suggest a reincarnation hypothesis, such as those in Ian Stevenson's "Twenty Cases Suggestive of Reincarnation" and "Across Time and Death" by Mary Sutton, which present very convincing cases with no alternative explanations. However, such evidence is purely circumstantial, not hard scientific. As to all the other phenomena used to support the afterlife hypothesis - amazing mediums, seances, Electronic Voice Phenomenon (capturing ghostly voices on tape), automatic writing, spirit photography, etc. - they are interesting, ambiguous, and may or may not be real. But either way, such phenomena does not seem conclusive enough to make life after death a hard objective universally verifiable fact. Again, perhaps our whole notion of what consciousness is, is wrong? Maybe it's totally different in nature than what we think? Could an answer somewhere in the middle be possible? Or could the type of consciousness in the afterlife dimension be totally different than the kind we have in this life, as Dr. Melvin Morse, pediatrician and NDE researcher/author, postulated? What he concluded was that "something" definitely survives death, but it's not the ordinary consciousness that we have in this life. Can such questions ever be answered? Or are they eternally unanswerable?
wow poltergeist to match the entity have you ever seen T.A.P.s on tv? I think they're a group of ghost hunters who try to get scientific evidence on the subject oh yeah and top ratings for their genre. Anyways if you have any more activity it pays to get it on camera or a good real estate agent! One of my friends aunt died a few years ago and she had to clean the late aunt's apartment. She said she felt something cold in the room and felt dizzy with a bad headache whist cleaning up. nothing as bad as that poltergeist you had though. Houdini on the other hand was an agnostic spiritualist who wanted to prove to the living that he could breach the metaphysical plain. Got to say it's a bold idea only wish it did happen. ROOFIS
To me, the human body reflects the universe in it's appearance when observed under a microscope. So life imitates life imitates life. I see it as we never really left home. We have always been part of it and will always remain. it's all very complex, yet very simple. All life is composed of energy (nucleus, protons & neutrons) and so is the universe. Thoughts can be measured as energy and thus it's our way of staying in communication with all that's around us on a subconscious (even spiritual) level. Of course one must remember each creature on this planet perceives on different levels. Pigeons for instance can see ultra violet rays. Humans can not. They say meditation helps us tune into and align ourselves to the frequencies we are otherwise untrained to perceive. I know one thing which I've chosen to try and live by as my own universal truth... 1) Always help people 2) Never hurt another human being 3) And allow people to express their inner self - so long as it acknowledges the 2nd point.
it will be a long way to the final answer regarding these questions..so far we know it's impossible to find the end of the universe it will be also wonderful to know death is only the beginning of something else...new experiences or discoveries.
First of all, thank you all for your answers and i'm very happy to see that there are other people interested about this subject. I will answer each of one, then i will express my opinion. @Haegemonia So far nobody has been able to demonstrate the existence of the soul, spirit, body energy or God, just as nobody can prove otherwise. I personally do not believe in the existence of the soul/spirit or other energy and to respond concretely to your questions: You're convinced that your senses that offers processable material that allows you ponder, rational and develop this theory emphasize the absolute reality? No, senses do not give a perception of "absolute reality". But is the instrument through which we review the snatches of the world.In their absence we can only imagine things like a man who bornes blind from birth can have an idea about the color red. There are parts of the brain that handles reception of information (visual, auditory, tactile etc..) Other areas responsible for processing information and others responsible for reasoning, mental ... It is perfectly possible to lose all senses without affecting thinking, just as it may lose the higher functions of a person sees, hears, feels it. So you have a blind genius, or you have an idiot who sees the falcon. It is important that all these are produced by violating the very specific parts of the brain, demonstrable and repeat, and not connected with anything else "immaterial". Here you are totally wrong! This perception is made by smart people for idiots...and let me explain why!! : Here i bring again my example with genious which becomes idiotic by violating several centers nervous. Does it cease to exist just because it's no more capable of scientist reasoning thinking? No, not cease to exist, but reduced the status of any mammal or plant. It is alive, but the cerebral cortex is injured, incapable of abstract thought. You'll probably feel a feeling of hunger, thirst, pain ... and like that. Who is due to the change? Accident suffered from brain, heart, spirit, soul, or change of soul with a second-hand soul???????? It's absurd to make medicine and not even think about the people who come in contact as some people, I think cohort, to treat him like any other. Depends on what means the soul. I assure you that they are very human and prone to all the suffering, desires, aspirations fellow you treat. But we need a brownie to me explain the origin of the experience, they are the result of brain activity. Evidence that these patients are better addressed by the treatment of brain and nervous system in general, instead we have not seen a priest to heal such a paralysis, a multiple sclerosis or Parkinson's disease. It would be easier, if we have a life sterile and useless. Useless life and a death predicted. Again I can not be agreed. Just awareness that we live one life makes me do my utmost to comport as well as to achieve more. If I had more, I thank you with the thought that you can not now may have to go luck next time. A weak makes "good" because it expects to be paid from somewhere up in a life then, or in another life. One weak and do good for fear of punishment post-mortem (like burn in hell or other nerozii ... by the way, how can you burn a spirit/soul/energy, which is immaterial and does not feel excitement). A strong man makes "good" because this is his way of being, and because he knows that will bring good to his society, and knows the good to society is his good too, and he realized wthat the good is. DNA cells of the body is alive. Any sensation is perceived by nerve cells due to chemical reactions. Every body is subject to the rules imposed by these reactions. In addition, intervene and other types of energy, such as electric. All those elements mean life in how people understand. For there is a need for order in a certain sense, good or resulted in some wording acceptable limits. This order exists in the universe and is found in organic form. At the time the destruction balance the body (human or not) I came hard to believe that this mixture can be considrat life as it existed. After the law, nothing is lost everything is transformed, we can assume that the constituent elements of the "mixture" they lost the order. If we think a little, we were all hydrogen atoms that boil inside stars, so your answer about where DNA come you will not find it on Planet Earth. I wanted to give an example so every body will understand that we are capable of big things, and i think that building a space ship and going to moon, is not a small one.Thank you for understanding my idea. This conception of yours about DNA that tell us how to survive and you make a example on money is wrong, is made by smart people for idiots(we exclude the persons from this forum), and let me explain why: Did you know that our BRAIN is smarter that ALL THE DATA CENTERS FROM OUR ENTIRE WORLD? Let me explain why: 1 NEURON from our BRAIN can calculate over 100 miliard query'es per second, in the same time our brain must calculate: Our equilibrum so we will not fall and walk straight, the way we see, the way we move, and other things. Our brain has BILLIONS of NEURONS, NOW think about what you can do with your mind, and what power you have in You MIND and what prototype of PC, take good care of HIM.
@michael_nguyen We can make this happen, don't forget that every dream is possible. If you thnk that there's an afterlife maybe there is.. @touchAshley Thank you for picture. Suppose that I am firmly convinced that the star X to 100 million light years there is a magical creature in the form of "shoe" and develop a whole theory starting from my faith. For example when "Shoe" moving in a certain way, people over 42 years have problems with family or at work. To assume that I am a great power of persuasion, find adherents, and there we have a ninth religion. Can someone over 1000 years demonstrate that there is a "Shoe" ?, Or what I write today in some books that are found then? No they will cant demonstrate. Some will belive, others not. Those who believe in the "shoe" will have arguments like: Something must be caused by trouble in the family, can not only be the fruit of chance! or must be true because so old books written in 1000 years. Those who do not believe in the shoe will say: None of what I have seen, studied, observed not confirm the existence of that entity, and in light of current knowledge seems very unlikely to exist. Who is right? We do not know. Each is a position that seems more likely. R∗ is the average rate of star formation in our galaxy fp is the fraction of those stars that have planets ne is the average number of planets that can potentially support life per star that has planets fℓ is the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop life at some point fi is the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop intelligent life fc is the fraction of civilizations that develop a technology that releases detectable signs of their existence into space L is the length of time such civilizations release detectable signals into space. or the old maths: * R* = 10/year (10 stars formed per year, on the average over the life of the galaxy) * fp = 0.5 (half of all stars formed will have planets) * ne = 2 (2 planets per star will be able to develop life) * fl = 1 (100% of the planets will develop life) * fi = 0.01 (1% of which will be intelligent life) * fc = 0.01 (1% of which will be able to communicate) * L = 10,000 years (which will last 10,000 years) Drake's values give N = 10 × 0.5 × 2 × 1 × 0.01 × 0.01 × 10,000 = 10. i'm skeptical toward about all parameters, but nothing seems so unlikely as the parameter "f ℓ 'chances as a combination of chemical elements (chemical reactions) casual to create a form of life. @Kinkyjoe But it can be converted to different forms chemical energy to heat energy potential energy to kinetic energy and others... @Mr_2 Yes we can answer, we are just laizy We can find out how big is. Let's say that if possible and if you do not know the truth about science or know insufficient, i still does not see human civilization reaching the threshold of such "intelligence" technology, without we auto-destroy before. @Ambalama mind/soul=brain, brain dies with body. @GhengisKhan Nice answer. @ROOFIS We're about to find out, CERN project