Anal sex with women says you lose, as does the fact that something being biologically unusual (which homosexuality isn't, since it has been observed repeatedly in animals) doesn't make it immoral. What is this even asking? Why is 'disgusting' being equated with 'immoral'? Just because you think gay sex is nasty does not make it morally wrong. But penguins, dolphins, and sheep do. Homosexuality is common to loads of animal species, but I don't even see why this matters. Just because something doesn't occur in nature doesn't make it wrong. After all, even dogs don't crap in a porcelain bowl! Guess you'd better give up the toilet, eh? You mean like when it says to not eat shellfish? If there is a reason for prohibiting homosexuality, show me what it is. You can't, because there isn't one. Maybe because they harm people / animals. Child abuse directly harms children, and bestiality (usually) directly harms animals. Being gay doesn't harm anyone. Then why can't you show me how gay people are IN ANY WAY related to these groups? The arguments are entirely different, but you're obviously incapable of grasping that. If you want to pull the child abuse card, fine. I bet gay people are using the same arguments used by supporters of interracial marriage. By your ridiculous logic, this means that interracial marriage is bad because it leads to gay marriage and all the other crap you try to tie gays in with. Your argument is so abhorrently immoral I want to cry. Why is it an abomination then? Surely you can show me! Oh, well. I guess not.
what you really mean is that you have a small dick sorry i just had to get that in. you are a waste of space, and all my commemts stand. you try to say that men dont commit crimes and only women do, but it's the innocent men that are in jail, because we dont like to jail women lol you are laughable. you need to look at the facts, men commit more crimes than women. violent crime, sexual crime, and child abuse crime. how many women can you name that have raped a man? very few, and it is mostly female teachers caught having sex with a student. and never by force. how many men can you name that have raped women, DP DATABASE is not big enough to hold the list i bet. the women that you say have attacked you, i bet they did it for a reason, it is not in our nature to attack unless in defence of ourselves or children. you were attacked because you were threatening to them. abusing them in some form, (not meaning sexually either) you can be abusive and offensive to us just like you are in this thread. "Now thats a total load of BS. Pia Its too bad you had 3 bad guys but that refelects as much on you as it does the guys. You made poor choices and then decided all guys are bad" as to this, it was my choice as a 15 year old virgin, to be beaten, dragged into woods and violently raped, is that what you are saying? and you cant see why women would find you offensive and threatening to them, because you are one sick dude. and yes, you are a potential wife beater.
Isn't lesbians just the same as two men doing it? How can a guy be a fag if he prefers straight porn over lesbian porn? Isn't the straight porn more natural? I see it like Yin and Yang. Whether you're watching porn with two guys doing it, or two girls, it is still Yin with Yin, and Yang with Yang, which is unbalanced. A man and a woman is Yin and Yang. I'm the same way. I don't like watching a porno with two women or with two men. Both are unnatural. If I was forced to make a decision though, I would pick the two women, because while two of them together is unnatural, it is better than two men, since they are both the opposite gender. In addition to this, I don't even like watching one woman take on three guys.........two many guys in the scene makes the movie wack, so I don't like watching that gangbang stuff. I like porn with balance, and balance for me is one woman with one man, which is the way nature made it. A guy is not gay because he prefers straight porn over lesbian porn. He just thinks that a man can get a woman off more than another woman, and that makes since, whether it is true or not. Also, I once had a roommate who was Bi. Everyone in the dorm was all pissed and made fun of me, but the guy never bothered me, and we got along fine. He knew I like girls, and he respected me, and I respected him. Personally, I don't accept gay marriage, but I don't want to go out and kill gays either. According to the U.S. Constitution the issue should be decided on a state level.
Makes sense. Old Welsh Guy & Will Spencer are right on here, people really need to stop telling other people what to do...
If you're going to go making claims like that you had better be ready to back them up. You're stereotyping millions of people to fit your opinion. And quite frankly, I think you are very mistaken. You don't even know what you're saying. Just because something "has been observed" doesn't not make it common. It's still unusual in every species.
Ok I'm done you are one scewed up chick. You cannot read nor comprehend that I never even implied such BS. I am well aware of crime rates by men and that they don't compare. But there are exceptions with women in crime and that one is that they are more often caught abusing children. Let me give you a tip: Women are more often the primary caretakers. That would be a good place for you to start debating. But anyway you were raped so now its all my fault and and I'm a wife beater and furthermore I'm abusing you by even responding. Let me tell you though I was raised in a lesbian home and it was abusive and sick as well. But I'm not going to blame you nor will I blame my heterosexuality upon abusive lesbians or gays in general. I will not say I am sorry you were raped because I refuse to accept responsibility for what someone else did. I will though say I am sympathetic to any person regardless of gender who has such a horrible hardship and I wish only that each person finds the power to use it to evolve into a better person.
We have soldiers getting killed daily. We have Iran holding UK soldiers illegally pushing us into another conflict. We have crooked regimes in Africa carrying out mass rape and genocide, We have people around the globe beleiving it is 'jehad and martyrdom' to blow up innocent men, women & kids through suicide bombings, and you start a thread stating it is an abomination to the lord to be gay? Now call me old fashioned here, but didn't the new Testament overrule the Old Testament, or is it still OK to practice an 'eye for an eye' Exodus 21:23–27? Is it OK to Stone your wife for being unfaithful? Love thy neighbour as if he were yourself, turn the other cheek etc. The New Testament preaches compassion, and tolerance, why do some people chose to hark back to the Old Testament when it suits their need (or more likely backs up their hidden agenda). Sorrry but it is plain and simple, People are gay, live with it PS. one of my friends gay friends came on to me once, I found it quite flattering I kindly explained that I was married and straight, and even if I was married and gay, I place fidelity TOP of my list of qualities needed for a loving relationship.
No, I don't believe "religious (Religion)" period. . .but I do believe: JESUS CHRIST +nothing=EVERYTHING!
Nothing Else offers me Eternal Life (and the Assurance that I'll never grow tired of it), with my CREATOR, SAVIOR & LORD. That's why THE GOOD NEWS ["GOSPEL"] IS: JESUS CHRIST+nothing=EVERYTHING!
Hmm let me See now My Grandfather was a pentecostal minister, his father was a baptist minister, my father is an elder and apostle, my mother was a Sunday school teacher and travels the country by invite, visiting churches of all denominations. I on the other hand grew up with the bible, I 'could' quote chapter and verse to you, but I see it as WRONG to shove it down the throat of others (No I am not back to the homosexual debate yet ) enforce my beliefs on others who do not share my beliefs. FACT: it is ILLEGAL to treat someone differently because they are gay, just the same as if they were black, Chinese, or any other ethnic minority. Homophobic behaviour is illegal, and were we not taught to obey the laws of the land? and to render unto Caesar that which is caesars? WHy do you feel the need to enforce YOUR beliefs, according to YOUR God, on others? People have as much right to NOT believe as you do TO believe. It saddens me when I see such religious zealot-ism. Let he who is without sin cast the first stone, AND, be aware of the PLANK in your own eye, before pointing out the splinter in the eyes of others. (throughout I have paraphrased scripture, as I believe the teachings to be more important than the actual words. After all the bible is NOT the word of God, it is the TRANSLATION of the word of God, handed down the generations. You HAVE to understand that the bulk of the bible is symbolic rather than 100% fact. It is IMPOSSIBLE to get every species on earth into a little boat, it is ALSO Impossible for us all to be descended from a complete man and a complete woman. (scientific proof shows there are more than one type of DNA strings in humans) SYMBOLICALLY though, a man could be the xy chromosomes, the woman be XX Chromosomes and THEN we could have evolved from them. Symbolism see, it really works. One final thing though. Didn't God make Adam in his image? In the beginning was the word, and the word was with God and the word WAS GOD! So why isn't Adam a word? Symbolism See, in the beginning was the word of god, he SAID, let there be light and there was light. SO...... Would you say that an entity as powerful as that, having made something 'in his image' would be more likely to produce DNA strings that can evolve into life, or a fully fledged man? Oh and after you have told me that ADAM & EVE were complete and I am talking rubbish, please explain to me the Galapagos islands and evolution. Then again, like I said, we have bigger fish to fry that worrying about it being wrong for a man to sleep with another man!