Homos should be stopped from adopting children to call their own

Aw, i thought you can do better than that man.
Here's another study:

http://www.familypride.org/blog/200...d-on-gay-and-lesbian-adoptionfoster-care.html

 

Facts are soo much better than just assumptions especially from people who don't even have actually education in such area.. or a PHd

 

I honestly think that can't be true, if indeed the study was published by an independent source.

 

With your way of thinking, I don't believe an independent study would help convince you at all. You seem pretty set in your assumptions that homosexuals make bad parents.

 

Think... and if it was a dependent source you would believe it? Regardless I don't think your opinion would change... Even if it was from a source that was bias against homosexuals (lol they would never publish such thing, just saying though..) or neutral

 

i think if it was chipped out on stone and handed to you by god, you still wouldnt believe it

 

I am demonstrating your lack of knowledge outside of your US borders ,my son

 

I'm thinking maybe the user who started this thread could have titled it, "Do you believe homosexuals should be able to adopt?"

And then in their post explained why they believe that homosexuals should not be able to adopt and ask other users opinion on the issue instead of being so antagonistic in the title with "Homos should be stopped from adopting children to call their own"

But for my opinion, I think homosexuals should be allowed to adopt. I know of a homosexual couple who have adopted a child and the child is living the life that a child should. There is no weird sexual molestation of the child going on and they love the child as a heterosexual couple would. I don't understand why so many people think that homosexuals are deviant and in that deviation, would hurt or molest a child or not be able to raise the child in a suitable way.
The child in my point is one of the happiest kids I've ever met.

Should people so negative towards others, judgmental, and antagonistic be able to adopt?

 

can I have a purple one ? You cant reply, all your replies go down to "my parents" "my dog", shsh

 

I think you did:

And Gtech was as speedy as a russian rocket, when he saw a word islam))) :

 

By asserting I said something that I didn't? What a putz!

I have hair on my ass that's older than you.

 

This thread is quite enlightening to me, although I am not Homosexual, I objected to the term Homos in the title of the thread.

Like you I find it antagonising and somewhat offensive and this thread has made me consider my own behaviour I see that I have often refered to a race in a similar way to the OP and never considered myself to be saying something that anyone could ever consider to be offensive.

How wrong I have always been!

I would like to applaude the OP for making me realise what a obnoxious idiot I have been.

 

Do I care whose d*ck is longer?

 

I don't know, do you? Do you often think about long hard phalluses after making a fool of yourself?

To each their own, right?

 

I did, when I was in school

 

You know - you wouldn't be so annoying if everything you said didn't make you look like a complete moron.

 

In Russia they say truth hurts

 

No, you just make yourself look like a complete moron.

 

You can't call yourself a Christian and still say its OK to be a homo. I believe that is one of the ultimate sins, right?

 

Hope you like getting poked from behind in hell - Jesus changed the rules and said to love everybody baby, and if you hate your neighbor no matter what he is, you be the worse sinner than the homosexual!

Also, homophobes = closet homosexuals 98% of the time. That's my own statistic. See? I can make them up too.

Hibeda hibeda hib that's all folks!