Hizbullah missile fire from inside an Civilian Arab home

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by soniqhost.com, Apr 28, 2008.

  1. #1
    Then the home gets blown up by Israel jets and Israel is blamed for spreading Terror.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ES86ezXu_Zg

    Here is a crazy Ideal maybe if missiles weren't being fired into Israel. Then Israel wouldn't have to fire back and everyone would be happy.
     
    soniqhost.com, Apr 28, 2008 IP
  2. sweetsara

    sweetsara Peon

    Messages:
    388
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    Are you aware of international law? If you are aware that any civillian might get injured in an attack then you don't proceed. No matter what the circumstances.

    Still, there is no proof that this is a Hezbollah fighter or anything. It is just a guy firing a rocket from a house.

    Here is a crazy idea, if Israel didn't randomly invade Lebanon when it felt like it and randomly violates it's airspace, then the couragous Lebanese people wouldn't have to fire rockets into Israel?
     
    sweetsara, Apr 28, 2008 IP
  3. browntwn

    browntwn Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    8,347
    Likes Received:
    848
    Best Answers:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    435
    #3
    Really? One single civilian might get hurt and international law prevents nations from defending themselves?

    What International law say that?

    You don't have a clue what is prohibited by International law.


    Right, just your normal everyday guy firing rockets into Israel from his home. Not some terrorist, just "a guy firing rockets"


    Yes, the Lebanese people suffer when their government refuses to guard its own border and allows terrorist group free reign. As one would expect, there are consequences.

    You have nothing to say about when Lebanon allows Hezbullah to cross the Lebanese border to kill and kidnap Israelis?
     
    browntwn, Apr 28, 2008 IP
  4. ncz_nate

    ncz_nate Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,106
    Likes Received:
    153
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    153
    #4
    Which came first the chicken or the egg? How do you know it wasn't Israel who started the missile firing?
     
    ncz_nate, Apr 28, 2008 IP
  5. stOx

    stOx Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,426
    Likes Received:
    130
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #5
    They deserve each other. neither side accepts any responsibility and both sides walk around pointing the finger of unquestionable blame. To be honest I'm sick of the lot of them.

    Do ya think, When you have wiped each other out, The rest of us can have our planet back?
     
    stOx, Apr 28, 2008 IP
  6. imad

    imad Peon

    Messages:
    2,321
    Likes Received:
    41
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    I watched that video long ago, the blast after each launch is weak, I think its mortar not Katuscha, here is a video that shows Katuscha, compare the blast, the distance in the first one is close, while in this one is much more far:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXd0VhN1GIE

    besides, its not known if that house is empty or not, the guy stopped the car, went down, walked, and nobody from the house got out to welcome or unwelcome him, besides the video is cut in parts, then merged to show only the parts when a rocket is launched with a blast, to give the impression they are Katuscha, its known that mortar has short range, so it could be that the residents evacuated after Israel started bombing them, and later we know that IOF ground forces advanced inside Lebanese lands, so its possible that this guy was also moving to follow IOF movements and be in range where he can hit them.

    I wouldn't consider it a proof personally, with more than 1000 civilian victims in Lebanon during 2006 war, all they got was this proof? there should be more.

    HRW proved in their Qana 2 investigation that IOF attacked civilians in a building where there was no hizballah fighters in it, or even close to it.
     
    imad, Apr 28, 2008 IP
  7. iggysick

    iggysick Guest

    Messages:
    2,781
    Likes Received:
    64
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    LMAO!
    That's it! It's 100% proof of what they claim all the time! :D
    Seriously, it's very hard to shot propaganda films these days. :rolleyes:
    They show the world this video like some kind of proof but when they have live footage of them murdering cameraman they have no evidence that it was murder. :D
    Check it out here

    hahahaha yeah, I saw a sign on guys jacket that clearly says: Hizbullah member. :D
     
    iggysick, Apr 28, 2008 IP
  8. pingpong123

    pingpong123 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,080
    Likes Received:
    117
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    175
    #8
    Agreed 100%, nothing more to add
     
    pingpong123, Apr 28, 2008 IP
  9. sweetsara

    sweetsara Peon

    Messages:
    388
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    If defending yourself includes killing innocents, then yes, you are braking international law. By your retarded logic, hitler was only defending himself when he killed the 6 million Jews, it dosen't matter that they died, he was only defending himself.
     
    sweetsara, Apr 29, 2008 IP
  10. browntwn

    browntwn Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    8,347
    Likes Received:
    848
    Best Answers:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    435
    #10
    Repeating it does not make it true.

    You fail to cite any law that says what you claim.

    (Your Hitler story just proves you don't have a clue what you are talking about. It has nothing to do with the topic at hand.)
     
    browntwn, Apr 29, 2008 IP
  11. webwork

    webwork Banned

    Messages:
    1,996
    Likes Received:
    47
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    The state of Israel is a terroist state.

    Israel has been the target of 100 UN Resolutions.


    # Resolution 517: " ... 'censures' Israel for failing to obey UN resolutions and demands that Israel withdraw its forces from Lebanon".
    # Resolution 518: " ... 'demands' that Israel cooperate fully with UN forces in Lebanon".
    # Resolution 520: " ... 'condemns' Israel's attack into West Beirut".
    # Resolution 573: " ... 'condemns' Israel 'vigorously' for bombing Tunisia in attack on PLO headquarters.
    # Resolution 587 " ... 'takes note' of previous calls on Israel to withdraw its forces from Lebanon and urges all parties to withdraw".
    # Resolution 592: " ... 'strongly deplores' the killing of Palestinian students at Bir Zeit University by Israeli troops".
    # Resolution 605: " ... 'strongly deplores' Israel's policies and practices denying the human rights of Palestinians.
    # Resolution 607: " ... 'calls' on Israel not to deport Palestinians and strongly requests it to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention.
    # Resolution 608: " ... 'deeply regrets' that Israel has defied the United Nations and deported Palestinian civilians".
    # Resolution 636: " ... 'deeply regrets' Israeli deportation of Palestinian civilians.
    # Resolution 641: " ... 'deplores' Israel's continuing deportation of Palestinians.
    # Resolution 672: " ... 'condemns' Israel for "violence against Palestinians" at the Haram al-Sharif/Temple Mount.
    # Resolution 673: " ... 'deplores' Israel's refusal to cooperate with the United Nations.
    # Resolution 681: " ... 'deplores' Israel's resumption of the deportation of Palestinians.
    # Resolution 694: " ... 'deplores' Israel's deportation of Palestinians and calls on it to ensure their safe and immediate return.
    # Resolution 726: " ... 'strongly condemns' Israel's deportation of Palestinians.
    # Resolution 799: ". . . 'strongly condemns' Israel's deportation of 413 Palestinians and calls for their immediate return.
     
    webwork, Apr 29, 2008 IP
  12. Ohad

    Ohad Guest

    Messages:
    622
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    So what? If this mortars and not Katyusha rockets it's fine? moreover you are not a rockets expert so you can't know.
    and again iggysick, propaganda. try to find another word to say, seriously.
     
    Ohad, Apr 30, 2008 IP
  13. iggysick

    iggysick Guest

    Messages:
    2,781
    Likes Received:
    64
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    Nah, it's 100% truth, right? :rolleyes:
    Thou the quality of picture is so low that there's no chance actually to see what's going on on video and there's bigger chance to see snowball in hell than prove that guy is a Hizballah member or that he's a member or any other terrorist group at all.

    Second, that's an Arab house? How do you know that? I've checked video few time but failed to see how some people managed to conclude that's Arab house.

    Third. So guy came with a car, fired missile and than what? Waited to get something back? Seriously, use logic some times.

    Fourth, a guy came with a car so only thing he could bring with him was a RPG or similar rocket launchers and and you wants to convince me that he fired RGP on Israeli cities from Lebanon?!? :D
    Cmmon! Which Israeli city is close enough to Lebanon so that someone can fire RGP on it? If you check the angle of rocket fired you can see that rocket is not fired to go too long. Anyone who ever fired or saw firing from RPG or any other rocket launchers knows that.

    Fifth, that video was from last Lebanon war and IOF were in Lebanon so distance from closest Israeli city was even further. Now, you can claim that video shows using civilian house to firing rockets on IOF troops but somehow I doubt that they would came in civilian car like they were coming on picnic to front lines to fight.

    Seriously, can you prove anything that poster of this video claims it shows?
    Anything at all? :)
     
    iggysick, Apr 30, 2008 IP
  14. imad

    imad Peon

    Messages:
    2,321
    Likes Received:
    41
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    it does not need a rocket expert to know that mortar range is 1000 meters
     
    imad, May 1, 2008 IP