Hillary, Rudy, Fred & Mitt all say, "I Have a Plan..."

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by gemini181, Oct 30, 2007.

  1. The Webmaster

    The Webmaster IdeasOfOne

    Messages:
    9,516
    Likes Received:
    718
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #21
    Well, when you're right, you're right. no point arguing that.
    I don't argue for the sake of arguement.. ;)
     
    The Webmaster, Oct 30, 2007 IP
  2. tesla

    tesla Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,840
    Likes Received:
    155
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    203
    #22
    Gtech, we have bases in hundreds of countries. That would qualify us as the global police, and an Empire I might add. And by the way, history shows that empires always fall. I wonder how long America will last as an empire? From the looks of things, we're already in decline.

    This is ridiculous. Ron Paul has made it clear that he is not an isolationist. You continue to confuse isolationist with non-interventionist. You have to learn the difference between the two Gtech, it is very important.

    How does RP want to surrender the U.S. to terrorists? How are the Middle Eastern countries going to take over the U.S.?

    If your country is truly at risk of being taken over by terrorists, you don't send your troops 6,000 miles away while illegals continue to flood over our wide open border, any of which could have a bio weapon, chemical weapon, or suit case nuke.

    If you want to protect the country, you seal off the borders and keep the troops at home. You may also work together with international agencies to look for the terrorists and eliminate them. It doesn't take hundreds of thousands of troops to accomplish this task.

    One more thing. If you're after terrorists, you look for them in the country that hosts them. You don't invade a country(Iraq), that has no connection to the terrorists. No matter how you look at it, Bush's current military strategy is ridiculous.

    This idiot has sent hundreds of thousands of troops to occupy a country, supposedly to look for a terrorist organization that is stateless and can move from place to place. Does that make sense? Ron Paul wants to protect American by bringing the troops home, where they can better protect us, because they're closer(Duh), and to seal off the borders so some terrorist doesn't sneak in with the illegals. Its really a no brainer.

    All thase accusations are baseless. Show me a shred of proof that Ron Paul takes donations from White Supremacist groups, anarchists, neo nazis, or anti semites. You don't have any evidence for this.

    Ron Paul would have to be a fool to openly accept donations from these groups. It would be just the ammunition his opponents need to punch holes in his otherwise flawless campaign. Ron Paul is far too intelligent and wise to accept donations from these groups, especially in a manner that would allow it to be publicized. To do so would cost him his election.

    Gtech, if you have no evidence to back up these claims, I demand that you retract this statement.
     
    tesla, Oct 31, 2007 IP
  3. gemini181

    gemini181 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,883
    Likes Received:
    134
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    155
    #23
    He has a decent, and growing, chance to win in new Hampshire.
     
    gemini181, Nov 1, 2007 IP
  4. gemini181

    gemini181 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,883
    Likes Received:
    134
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    155
    #24
    A very bad plan...
    One we are still suffering for today.
    • Also keep in mind the Shah was a brutal dictator who murdered many of his own people.
    • ...with US support. :(
     
    gemini181, Nov 1, 2007 IP