Help me with HTML

Discussion in 'HTML & Website Design' started by AdsenseOptimized, Dec 15, 2005.

  1. #1
    AdsenseOptimized, Dec 15, 2005 IP
  2. Lucky8

    Lucky8 Peon

    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    Looks ok to me what is that you want to do with it.....
     
    Lucky8, Dec 15, 2005 IP
  3. AdsenseOptimized

    AdsenseOptimized Peon

    Messages:
    187
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    if you check the w3.org validation it doesn't validate and it says there are errors. There will keep my out of top listings in the SERPS.

    Derek
     
    AdsenseOptimized, Dec 15, 2005 IP
  4. jocs

    jocs Peon

    Messages:
    103
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    the easyest way to fix the errors is looking on what w3c validator say you have errors.

    Look here

    the first thing, is the copyright symbol you entered at line 169, this is the first thing you have to remove, because it will make your site fail the test,
    
    169  <font face="Tahoma"><font size=-1>[COLOR="Red"]©[/COLOR] CopyRight 2005 GoalierThanThou.Com
    170 All rights Reserved.</font></font>
    171 "Goalie Logo &copy;C. Cleary 2004"
    172 </center>
    
    Code (markup):
    change it and put &copy;, because there is no character set that accepts this symbol, use the html entity instead.
    remove any BORDERCOLORLIGHT or BORDERCOLORDARK atribute, they will not pass the test.

    when you have this changed, test again, if you solve each error, your page wil pass w3c. If you need help, I'll help you, but first try to change the basic things.
     
    jocs, Dec 15, 2005 IP
  5. stuw

    stuw Peon

    Messages:
    702
    Likes Received:
    44
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    DW MX 2004 upwards comes with html and css validators. You could use those functions to highlight the bits that need to be changed.
     
    stuw, Dec 15, 2005 IP
  6. ServiceUptime

    ServiceUptime Peon

    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    is there any substitution for style cursor:hand as it is also not coming through validators?
     
    ServiceUptime, Dec 16, 2005 IP
  7. AdsenseOptimized

    AdsenseOptimized Peon

    Messages:
    187
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    I don't know, anyone?

    Derek
     
    AdsenseOptimized, Dec 16, 2005 IP
  8. Colleen

    Colleen Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    6,777
    Likes Received:
    725
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    430
    #8
    I can fix it up for you and make it validate but it will cost you, just pm me if interested.
     
    Colleen, Dec 16, 2005 IP
  9. texisman

    texisman Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    305
    Likes Received:
    17
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    158
    #9
    Home page looks fine to me using both IE and Firefox. If you just want to clean up your html some, try this CSE HTML Validator, lower right hand side of the page. Hope that helps.;)
     
    texisman, Dec 16, 2005 IP
  10. my44

    my44 Peon

    Messages:
    722
    Likes Received:
    24
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    The design is *there*, but you may need to reformat the font a little bit, it looks too busy. Try to get a cleaner font arrangement.
     
    my44, Dec 19, 2005 IP
  11. AdsenseOptimized

    AdsenseOptimized Peon

    Messages:
    187
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    i like the looks i just want some help getting code to validate...that makes it easier for SE's to spider
     
    AdsenseOptimized, Dec 19, 2005 IP
  12. Disabledwebmaster

    Disabledwebmaster Guest

    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    Won't cost you give me some time...
     
    Disabledwebmaster, Dec 19, 2005 IP
  13. noppid

    noppid gunnin' for the quota

    Messages:
    4,246
    Likes Received:
    232
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #13

    The first one needs an Encoding iso-8859-1 meta tag and just a few html problems fixed.

    Change the body tag margin stuff to CSS and change two backgorund settings in a table to CSS.

    The second one needs the encoding tag, one instance of the doc type removed , a table fixed, an img tag fixed, and an H1 fixed.
     
    noppid, Dec 19, 2005 IP
  14. Disabledwebmaster

    Disabledwebmaster Guest

    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    no errors already getting it valid w3c should take a while. This code is sloppy!
     
    Disabledwebmaster, Dec 19, 2005 IP
  15. noppid

    noppid gunnin' for the quota

    Messages:
    4,246
    Likes Received:
    232
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #15
    hehe, then I gather I just checked your progress rather then found the actual errors that existed?
     
    noppid, Dec 19, 2005 IP
  16. Disabledwebmaster

    Disabledwebmaster Guest

    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #16
    No errors in DW, friend... If you care to edit it please let me know, and please do so. :)


    Doesn't mean its w3c valid.
     
    Disabledwebmaster, Dec 19, 2005 IP
  17. noppid

    noppid gunnin' for the quota

    Messages:
    4,246
    Likes Received:
    232
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #17
    Well Dreamweaver is not necessarilly w3c code though. That's why he asked for w3c validation on the DW generated code. Yes, the DW code renders, but it's not w3c usually.

    Did I misunderstand the point?
     
    noppid, Dec 19, 2005 IP
  18. Disabledwebmaster

    Disabledwebmaster Guest

    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #18
    hehe I think you missed somthin. ;)
    "No errors in DW, friend..." "Doesn't mean its w3c valid."

    EDIT:tis ok I'm a bit tired/moody sry bout that.
     
    Disabledwebmaster, Dec 19, 2005 IP
  19. Disabledwebmaster

    Disabledwebmaster Guest

    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #19
    BTW adsense optimized I think we would be better off with a new layout. what do you think?
    In regards to your "hockey" page.

    EDIT: ummm I think I'm missing something now, adsense why is this marked as your homepage via profile? http://www.homeequityexplained.com/
     
    Disabledwebmaster, Dec 19, 2005 IP
  20. my44

    my44 Peon

    Messages:
    722
    Likes Received:
    24
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #20
    Are there really any documented evidence that W3C will improve SERPs for our pages? If anyone ever checked google.com for W3C compliance, there like 100+ errors. Or google is the exception because is the search engine king?
     
    my44, Dec 20, 2005 IP