1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

'He looks like hell': Donald Trump unloads on Glenn Beck after being accused of voting for Obama

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by qwikad.com, Jan 16, 2016.

  1. grpaul

    grpaul Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    785
    Likes Received:
    221
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #201
    He said some bad things about women that has polarized the liberals. The timing of these women coming out speaking against Trump is very convenient and in my opinion - it's a planned distraction for the left. What's crazy is that while the left calls every single thing Hillary has against her a conspiracy - they will believe every word these women say.

    These stories coming out about the planned violence at Trump rallies and the cover ups in the email scandal - is pretty incredible.
    SEMrush
     
    grpaul, Oct 18, 2016 IP
    jrbiz likes this.
    SEMrush
  2. jrbiz

    jrbiz Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    5,457
    Likes Received:
    2,362
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    570
    #202
    Of course, that is the left's game plan: accuse the right of what they, themselves, actually do. Can you imagine the righteous indignation if it was proven that Trump's people were hiring thugs to disrupt her rallies as the wikileaks emails prove they are doing? Or if it had been a Hillary campaign office that had been firebombed in NC? It is always the left elites that "go all in" and always sink to new depths to retain their power and privilege but with a co-conspirator, lamestream press they have been able to get away with it for decades. There is now (a much smaller) counter-media to get the truth out and that has them almost hysterical in disbelief in which they turn to fascism on college campuses, at trump rallies, etc., to stop open political discourse. It is always that way with socialists, communists, etc. They must squash all dissent at all costs in order to keep their "facts" and narratives unchallenged.
     
    jrbiz, Oct 18, 2016 IP
    grpaul and billzo like this.
  3. qwikad.com

    qwikad.com Illustrious Member Affiliate Manager

    Messages:
    6,715
    Likes Received:
    1,469
    Best Answers:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    425
    #203
    As of now:

    [​IMG]
     
    qwikad.com, Oct 22, 2016 IP
  4. jrbiz

    jrbiz Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    5,457
    Likes Received:
    2,362
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    570
    #204
    Yes, this one and the Rasmussen polls show Trump leading. However, I personally do not pay much attention to polls at this point. This is because most of the polls, like the lamestream media's "news" coverage, are totally corrupted by the same establishment elites and other corrupt interests in an effort to depress the conservative vote by discouraging people into thinking that their cause is lost. Much like what happened, most recently, during the U.K. Brexit vote. Only in the last few days of that vote, did the pollsters actually show the true results because they knew that their credibility would be on the line if they did not get it right in the week before the actual vote (nobody remembers the earlier poll results.) This deceptive practice has been going on for decades here in the U.S.

    I think that the Clinton Crime Family knows that their collection of government elites, union thugs, and the "takers" who are given free stuff from the government are not really excited about her and that their vote turnout will be lackluster. So, their final day efforts will focus on voter fraud (as usual) and trying to discourage the conservative vote. It is all that they have.
     
    jrbiz, Oct 23, 2016 IP
  5. Bushranger

    Bushranger Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,815
    Likes Received:
    240
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #205
    uspolls.jpg
     
    Bushranger, Oct 24, 2016 IP
  6. jrbiz

    jrbiz Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    5,457
    Likes Received:
    2,362
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    570
    #206
    Have you seen the wikileaks emails (Podesta) exposing the "rigging" of the polling results, much as I mention above? No surprises here. John Kerry's campaign team in 2004 even tried to rig exit polling on election day in an attempt to continue to discourage conservative voter turnout on the west coast. The hilarious part of that was that they began believing their own rigged polls and mistakenly thought that he had won the election.
     
    jrbiz, Oct 24, 2016 IP
  7. Bushranger

    Bushranger Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,815
    Likes Received:
    240
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #207
    I agree, polls are useless these days but, seeing the first one posted above I thought i'd share a more rounded one from NYT.

    Sampling 1,000 people from 150 million voters (guess) seems ridiculous, laughable really. We sample 1,000 from 12 million voters and they're hardly ever right these days too. Seems each gives the result the pollster wants to hear.

    I think it's more like 70/30 in Hillary's favour, it's 90/10 amongst the people I know, but there's only 1 big poll that will count.
     
    Bushranger, Oct 24, 2016 IP
  8. grpaul

    grpaul Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    785
    Likes Received:
    221
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #208
    People on the left do not give a damn - in their eyes she (or they) can do no wrong. Similar to Barack back in 2008.

    Notice how barely anyone is mentioning anything related to the WikiLeaks and/or Project Veritas. And when they do they either discredit it, attack James O'Keefe or claim it "can't be accurate because they are just clips". .. Perfectly OK to blame Trump for "working with Russia" - but as we saw in the debates - if Hillary is pressed on something she pivots.

    Two people get canned - doesn't indicate an ounce of proof or guilt.

    Robert Creamer and his frequent visits to the White House - nope not shady at all. Was probably there to talk about their kids, similar to B.J. Clinton's meeting with Loretta Lynch on the "runway".

    Everything negative mumbled about Trump is instantly believed.

    That was a conspiracy - just like Al Gore and Hillary whining (to use Obama tough talk) about losing in the election in 2000. Never happened!

    It's hilarious how the propaganda tools CNN, MSNBC, etc. on the left will spin anything / everything they possibly can to help get her elected. Take a look at a look at how Trump is getting attacked for the remark he made about "not conceding" in the last debate. "Oh no, that is the end of him". Also, his comments about the system being rigged - was huge news. As if, we expect the media to be any anyone's side but the liberals.

    I do not think there is a sane person out there that would say the voting system in this country does not need to be fixed.
     
    Last edited: Oct 25, 2016
    grpaul, Oct 25, 2016 IP
    jrbiz likes this.
  9. jrbiz

    jrbiz Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    5,457
    Likes Received:
    2,362
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    570
    #209
    Well, the government/media elites and their bureaucracies, the union thugs, and the "takers" who receive government largesse like things just the way they are. To repeat my point from before: the real question is whether we have reached the tipping point where this corrupt, disgusting group is now slightly in the majority.
     
    jrbiz, Oct 25, 2016 IP
  10. grpaul

    grpaul Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    785
    Likes Received:
    221
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #210
    I think there is a reason why the majority of news outlets are so willing to defend the liberals.

    I also believe there is a reason why Obama and Clinton have had BILLIONS of dollars donated to each of them.

    Speaking of funny business, I am sure you saw this during the debate.. . One of the best pivots ever.



    I still don't get the the giggling / laughing and how in the world that makes her look presidential in any way. But, hey - nothing to take seriously. :)
     
    Last edited: Oct 25, 2016
    grpaul, Oct 25, 2016 IP
  11. Bushranger

    Bushranger Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,815
    Likes Received:
    240
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #211
    "Notice how barely anyone is mentioning anything related to the WikiLeaks"

    The guy hates America (that's the reason his holed up for 5 years), and that's also why he's backing Trump.

    Not many pay him attention since he turned coward and didn't want to face up to responsibility.
     
    Bushranger, Oct 25, 2016 IP
    wordplucker likes this.
  12. jrbiz

    jrbiz Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    5,457
    Likes Received:
    2,362
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    570
    #212
    Her focus group consultants have told her repeatedly that she is not likable and, therefore, needs to laugh and smile more when in public view. Since this is hard for a nasty person like her to do so, she comes off as phony, which, of course, it is.
     
    jrbiz, Oct 25, 2016 IP
  13. jrbiz

    jrbiz Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    5,457
    Likes Received:
    2,362
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    570
    #213
    Yes, blame the messenger and ignore the emails, of which, by the way, no one is disputing the authenticity. Nothing to see here, folks, it's the Russians, it's sleazy wikileaks, it's a vast right-wing conspiracy, whatever; just pay no attention to what the emails are clearly showing. And, of course, pay no attention to the videos as they also were made by "bad people" who tricked the Dem operatives into bragging about their sleazy and illegal activities. It's all unimportant and has no bearing on one's fitness for office. After all, graft, corruption, dirty tricks, etc., those are Billary's birth rights. And did I remind you that Trump sometimes says mean things and should be disqualified from office over that?
     
    jrbiz, Oct 25, 2016 IP
  14. grpaul

    grpaul Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    785
    Likes Received:
    221
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #214
    Oh, the wonderful moments of this election. . .



    I rarely watch Megyn Kelly - but it was fun to see Newt D.E.S.T.R.O.Y her in this interview. His comment at 6:29 is great - and her response shows just how desperate some people are for reasons to dislike Trump.

    Just another claimed "unbiased journalist".
     
    Last edited: Oct 26, 2016
    grpaul, Oct 26, 2016 IP
    jrbiz likes this.
  15. jrbiz

    jrbiz Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    5,457
    Likes Received:
    2,362
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    570
    #215
    Newt is one of those people who is so intelligent and so good at cutting to the chase, that I enjoy listening to him whenever he is speaking. It's funny, but I have never liked Megyn, even way before the Trump issue made her a headliner in the left's eyes. She always seems so hellbent on proving that she is the smartest person in the room, which she often is not. I feel the same way about Bill O'Reilly. That said, I love Fox News as they have been such a refreshing alternative to the lamestream media that I was forced to endure for decades prior to there being other options besides unabashed, leftwing news reporting.
     
    jrbiz, Oct 26, 2016 IP
    grpaul and billzo like this.
  16. billzo

    billzo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    961
    Likes Received:
    278
    Best Answers:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    113
    #216
    Funny how all the polls showing Hillary with a big lead are left-leaning. Bloomberg shows Trump with a 2 point lead in battleground Florida.


    I don't have cable so I don't watch Fox News. Not even on broadcast TV. Years ago I stopped watching the nightly news on TV and I discovered that my stress level went down. I check out news headlines and put the nuggets of truth in the news stories together to form something resembling the truth.

    Fact is that when running on the important issues of the day (illegal immigration, national debt, health insurance costs, rising violent crime), Democrats lose every time. It was interesting how Hillary's campaign came up with the either phony or exaggerated October Surprise against Trump to nullify criticism of her husband's sex crimes and her smear campaigns against his accusers. Some of the women accusing Trump of inappropriate touching are downright not attractive and no way would Trump forcibly kiss them. Or anything else.

    When I watched the entire (as much as was released) Access Hollywood audio/video of Donald Trump and Billy Bush joking around, I liked Trump much more. He's just a regular guy. I love how he talks about coming on to Nancy O'Dell and getting rejected. "I moved on her and I failed. I'll admit it." Hilarious!



    And it is clear he is joking around. Not admitting any crimes or anything. Just joking.
     
    billzo, Oct 26, 2016 IP
    jrbiz and grpaul like this.
  17. grpaul

    grpaul Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    785
    Likes Received:
    221
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #217
    Agreed, Newt is great. Both Megyn and Bill try to play the "unbiased" crap and more often than not they are terrible at it. That entire interview with Newt was obnoxious because it provided nothing new and (similar to the Rosie comment) she is just looking for attention. Not to mention the lame journalists who do the "I am not taking a position" while arguing with the person he/she invited on the show - which is absurd. Don Lemon, the Lemon - does a great job of that at CNN - lemon.

    To what Newt is talking about with regards to these women having a problem with Trump and his comments - it is amazing that no one seems to care that Hillary's husband, a known sexual predator, will be in White House - and he gets pass. Again.

    With regards to Fox News - I see them tanking if they sign Megyn Kelly to this huge deal and place her at the center piece of their network.
     
    grpaul, Oct 27, 2016 IP
    jrbiz likes this.
  18. grpaul

    grpaul Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    785
    Likes Received:
    221
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #218
    This kind of sh*t is only OK when Liberals sign off on it!

    The elitists would love it if we all believed that celebrities sat around, talking, watching movies, reading books and drinking tea. :)
     
    grpaul, Oct 27, 2016 IP
  19. jrbiz

    jrbiz Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    5,457
    Likes Received:
    2,362
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    570
    #219
    The polls are "tightening" as we get closer to the election, much as I predicted earlier in this thread. I have a couple of comments about where we are today:

    1. Can you imagine how far in the lead Trump would be if the lamestream media (which still has more clout, by far, than the conservative media) was actually unbiased? It would be a runaway.

    2. I remember the 1980 election between Carter and Reagan. The lamestream media/polls had Carter up by 9% about 4 days before the election. Of course, Reagan won by a LANDSLIDE. I recall how confused, depressed, and shook up the lamestream TV anchors (which were the only game on TV back then) were when it became clear that Reagan was winning and winning big on election night. Ultimately, they concluded that they had "shamed" the electorate by completely demonizing Reagan throughout the campaign (much like they have done to Trump) and the people being polled were reluctant to tell the truth about whom they intended to vote for.

    Again, the lamestream media and their co-conspirator pollsters are reading from their traditional playbook which is to declare the Democrat as the sure winner with only a week or two to go. This is all a charade that is best ignored if it is stressing you out.to depress conservative voters. I am hopeful that most voters are seeing through this tired game and, in fact, will show up BIG at the polls and make a difference.
     
    jrbiz, Oct 27, 2016 IP
  20. billzo

    billzo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    961
    Likes Received:
    278
    Best Answers:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    113
    #220
    I posted a link in another thread where the writer of the article tried to portray Trump as a fraud and linked him to a failed development in Mexico that Trump had nothing to do with other than licensing his name.

    And the bigger problem than the biased news media is the crooked President of the USA who thwarted criminal prosecution of Hillary Clinton. Have you ever heard of the head of the Department of Justice delegating the decision to charge Hillary to the head of the FBI who does not ever have any such responsibility? He admitted that evidence exists that Hillary violated the law and still, no charges.

    A reasonable prosecutor would have at the very least convened a grand jury to decide on an indictment of Hillary. Obama wouldn't allow that, either.

    The fact that an inexperienced, incompetent nobody like Barack Obama got elected in the first place speaks volumes of the intelligence of today's electorate. Obama had no personal nor professional nor political accomplishments and got elected based on promises of free stuff and fluffy speeches. People aren't any smarter today, which is why Hillary is still in the running.

    Trump's claim of a rigged election is being shown to be more and more true every day. A Democrat front group in Indiana was raided for turning in a bunch of phony voter registrations with fake names or fake birth dates or fake addresses.

    And project Veritas has revealed that Democrat front groups headed by guys who have made many visits to Obama in the White House have been the ones sending operatives to incite violence at Trump rallies. And they also boast about committing voter fraud (no evidence of that yet) and may have committed other illegal activity.

    Then we have learned how Hillary Cinton's husband Bill got paid $17.6 million from Laureate International Universities to "inspire people" immediately after Hillary became Secretary of State. And the for-profit school got something like $90 million from the State Department afterward (exact figures elude me at the moment).

    Today in the news we see how the guy who helped run the Clinton Foundation was pressuring corporations to pay Bill Clinton money for speeches and he boasted how he has secured Bill $66 million in future payments if all the agreements hold.

    Maybe some people are seeing the light:

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/20/voters-agree-media-biased-against-donald-trump/

     
    billzo, Oct 27, 2016 IP
    jrbiz likes this.