Huh? A. Palestine wasn't a proper country back then. B. Those who did rule it were the British C. The british signed the Balfour agreement, the one you're pissed about that says they'll work toward providing a home for Jews in Israel D. The country you're living in - Jordan, it's also been given independence by the British, so don't have double standards. Bullshit. And before you give me this map: The 1946 part isn't what you call it. There were places where Jews bought land there and formed forms of settlements there. Globally, the British still supervised those parts.
I think that in general most of the Arabs don't completely refuse for an Israel state now a days, but what they claim is that the Israel does not have a limit, and they keep on occupying more area than what US agreed for them.
you avoid to speak about what really happened, what about the 800,000 Palestinians who been forced to leave their homes and properties, and that been given to the Zionists, this is the robbery we were talking about, Jordan did not have some foreigners coming from Europe to expel it's people, if this happened to Jordanian, they would resist it too, Jordanians had the right to self-determine their future on their own land which they practiced and got their independence, Palestinians still did not get their independence, that's why they are resisting occupation till these days. Britain did not own the lands to give them to whom does not deserve them, we already covered all these in details, there is no right for the Zionists in Palestine, not historical, nor religious, and what they did in 1948, are crimes that they should be judged for them, and what is happening right now, is a continue for these crimes.
When did this happen? You do know that 'The Mandate of Palestine' is this: That includes current Jordan. So you're saying Britain didn't own the land, so technically they couldn't have given you Jordan, could they? They decided that part X will be Jordan and part Y will be Israel, you're OK with the Jordan part because that serves you well, but you're not OK with the Israel part because you don't like it. That's double standards. Did the Zionists immigrate very fast? Yes. Did they move to that area way too quickly than normal? Yes. I agree, the situation happened way too quick and might have caused a shock in the arab community, but you also have to look at the other side and realize the circumstances weren't that great for them too, so you can't really blame them (And antisemitism happened everywhere in the 1900's, even in Arab countries where they decided to take all of the property of Jews away, and they immigrated to Israel).
No you got it wrong, it is a logical reason to wage a guerrilla warfare where they are present, in many cases in civilian population because there is no other way to fight. However, it's not logical to justify the killing of civilians by saying the bad guy was hiding behind him that's why I did it. You can put out an argument that Israel has to defend it's citizens as a first priority and if that means killing lots of civilians to do so then so be it. Now that is a valid argument. All I'm saying is that this arguement that is being coin around right now is not logical. Anyone who is majoring or studying Logical Philosophy will know this. It's not even a valid arguement.
yes of course British did not own the land, they occupied the land, as they did to so many other regions, for example India, would it make sense if they gave it to Arabs, and then Arabs claimed it as their because British gave it to them? and used this as a reason to ethnic cleanse Indians? later Britain left the problem to UN and UN came with the partition plan which the Zionists did not implement, they occupied more territories than been allocated to them. There was no antisemitism in the region, Jews themselves admits it, but later after the Zionists came with the project to steal Palestine, people resisted it, and still resisting it till these days.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JR6MyaN5jpY Good Jew man confessing that israel state shoudn't be exist in palestine, they were living peacfuly with muslims for many generations till zionism breaks all that.
This has to be the most absurd and dishonest counter argument I can recall seeing in the past few days here. Of course, dishonesty and lunacy abounds when muslims are attacking infidels, especially Israel/Jews. The delusion is put to rest with Hamas' dead baby strategy. Neither muslims nor other anti-semites are fooling anyone by dishonestly making an argument that is proven time and again. One need only look at some of the murderous/terrorist videos put out by these savages, to see children right next to them, being used as shields. Israel was Israel before a man invented islam.
Put to rest by DERSHOWITZ? He's a Zionist himself. Just look at the comments on that page to which you linked. Where does the video show that they're using children as shields? It's a stupid guy filming another stupid guy. Nothing was even fired! If they were really using human shields, Israel would have let journalists enter Gaza so that all the world would see. And Hezbollah didn't use human shields in 2006, either. That was another murderous war by Israel. They attacked ambulances, UN buildings and an observer post. I remember when they attacked a convoy of vehicles full of people, especially children. The vehicles were fleeing a village (Marwaheen) in the South of Lebanon, because that village was being bombed by Israel. I will never forget the photos of those dead children!
Put to rest quite well and articulated very well. I know you muslims don't like him though, because he's not one of those self-hating jews. It shows quite well, a palestinian terrorist armed, ready for fighting, as usual, right amongst kids. The hell they didn't. It was well documented back then and much the topic of discussion here then too. You might want to rethink your kitman strategies here, before stepping off into dissimulation of that magnitude. No, your buds hid behind the UN and willfully fired upon Israel in a war they started with Israel, from civilian locations. The ambulance hoax has long been exposed. Your bud, green helmet guy, admitted to staging photos of dead children. Brush up on your taqiyya skills, bud. This ain't pre-9/11. Us infidels are not as dumbed down these days. Well, some still are, but many are not.
Tone it down a little, maybe? Write whatever you want, but why insult other members? And I'm a Christian. Maybe I should put that in my signature? PS: Ask Bush about the WTC, not Bin Laden.
A little too early to be playing the victim card, isn't it? Perhaps you should tone it down a bit? If you are going to dissimulate propaganda, I'll correct it for you. That's what "King of Kings" and "ThraXed" and "Gworld" and a few others used to say too, until they slipped up one day and exposed themselves. Thanks, but I'm not a troofer. I don't need old white men with delusional conspiracy theories to think for me. I agree. I provided excellent sources to confirm such, including from the UN directly. Keep working that kitman, imad
I knew you have nothing better to say about these reports that been done by independent organizations, not by Imad
I'm well aware of "amnesty international," imad, and who and where they side with. Jeez, you act like you are first one to use them for dissimulation or something? Why not use a "self-hating" jew source as well? Not a peep on your brothers staged photos, or the fact that they were hiding behind the UN? Nah, probably don't want to go there, huh?
I'm getting the vibe of "Ok, hamas are weaklings in comparison to Israel, thus it is -maybe- -somehow- legitimate to hide behind & use innocent civilians - just because they can't really do anything else". If you can't fight - stfu and give in instead of acting like beasts and being responsible for the deaths of innocent lives, without even giving a damn.
I agree. It is just not justifiable to use the civilian population in Palestine to kill Jews. It's ridiculous.
lol so hilariously over-exaggerated it completely destroys the credibility of the rest of the article.