Had to share this!

Discussion in 'Twitter' started by Webinx, Jul 20, 2012.

0
  1. #1
    So,

    how true is that?

    [​IMG]

    :D
     
    Webinx, Jul 20, 2012 IP
  2. nufox

    nufox Peon

    Messages:
    749
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    It doesn't look convincing.
     
    nufox, Jul 20, 2012 IP
  3. ninjamtlt1

    ninjamtlt1 Active Member

    Messages:
    1,704
    Likes Received:
    24
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    88
    #3
    It's really fake, those sites have way more links coming into them than that.
     
    ninjamtlt1, Jul 20, 2012 IP
  4. latnemele

    latnemele Member

    Messages:
    120
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    #4
    This proves how accurate these PageRank checkers actually are. Thank you for sharing this
     
    latnemele, Aug 6, 2012 IP
  5. SantosHelper

    SantosHelper Peon

    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    Weird. Fake? Bug? Whatever it is, I dont think that is accurate at all. Thanks for sharing it though.
     
    SantosHelper, Aug 6, 2012 IP
  6. Webinx

    Webinx Member

    Messages:
    221
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    35
    #6
    Pretty sure it's some coding mistake when they created the script. Maybe they though a PR 10 could not be achieved, so they put it "if PR10 then NOT VALID".

    Weird though.
     
    Webinx, Aug 7, 2012 IP
  7. quiz

    quiz Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,383
    Likes Received:
    17
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    128
    #7
    Websites like Google.com, Facebook.com, Twitter.com, etc achieved it to become PR10 for sure so it must be a coding issue or maybe they went above PR10 :p.
     
    quiz, Aug 7, 2012 IP
  8. Webinx

    Webinx Member

    Messages:
    221
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    35
    #8
    Actually, Google and Facebook are PR9, and Twitter is the only PR10. That's the weird part. Maybe they are pointing out that there can't be a site which has a higher PR than Google, thus labeling it as a fake. :D
     
    Webinx, Aug 7, 2012 IP