Before I talk about prices, my work, and my services, let me tell you a bit about what I do and why I do it. I REFUSE TO DESIGN WEB 2.0. The simple reason for this is that it has become monotonous. You can have good design without it being web 2.0. Minimalism is usually my preferred method of design, but I do love to use textures as well. If you are still interested, my information is down below ---------------------------- Hello, I am offering these services: - Logo/Identity design - Print design (Posters, Shirts, Book Covers, CD covers, etc.) - Screen design (desktops and web graphics) - Web Design [landing pages, web pages, wordpress, etc.] (design only) As far as prices. I'm going to let you choose the price. If it is reasonable I will accept the job. I do reserve the right to turn down clients if the price is too low. Also, I only accept paypal. Here is some of my work. Thanks, Greg
Web 2.0 isn't a "web design" style - All designers should know this by now. Google it Nice designs and logos, though.
I know. But that is generally what it is referred to. Web 2.0, in theory, is how new "web 2.0" websites are more interactive with it's users. In all actuality, the majority of people seem to believe it refers to gloss, reflections, cute bubbly icons, etc. That is what I was referring to. Thanks for the compliment though
are you able to design blogs (no WP, not coded) ? i've read you stopped web2.0 but i need something 'alive', please PM me offers if you are interested
This is really good stuff! Usually don't see this stuff on DP. What is your average price per graphic? I am not looking to hire, just curious.
I'm looking to fill one or two graphic design jobs. I will design sites, but currently I will not code them. Here is some recent work. There have been a few other jobs...but I cannot release them as of yet. -Greg
Wow, I just checked these out and you're work is amazing. If I ever need anything done, I'll be coming straight to you.
No, it is almost assumed that it is a style...it isn't. Web 2.0 just means having websites more interactive with users. Most people seem to think it means pointless gradients, reflections, icons, etc. just thrown about. I don't consider web 2.0 the style because by definition it has nothing to do with aesthetics.
I like your work, I have a small project for you, if you would be interested. Its just some graphics, not a complete template. Pm Me.