Google's Algorithm for the year 2011

Discussion in 'AdSense' started by yester123, Oct 28, 2011.

0
  1. #1
    Google's Score = (Kw Usage Score * 0.3) + (Domain * 0.25) + (PR Score * 0.25) + (Inbound Link Score * 0.25) + (User Data * 0.1) + (Content Quality Score * 0.1) + (Manual Boosts) - (Automated & Manual Penalties)
     
    yester123, Oct 28, 2011 IP
  2. Rupam Das

    Rupam Das Active Member

    Messages:
    317
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    80
    #2
    Wow......... Classy. One more thing, could you please elaborate the variables, like kw usage score? is it the score that number of times kw is appearing? It will be quite helpful and we can sort of calculate our score far too easily. If the penalties are huge, we may have a problem...
     
    Rupam Das, Oct 28, 2011 IP
  3. Make a perfect site

    Make a perfect site Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    376
    Likes Received:
    9
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    155
    #3
    Where are you getting this from?

    my thoughts in PHP:

    if (you show me that you are an engineer at Google)
{
echo "thank you, very useful";
}

else 
{
echo "You are a retard";
}
    PHP:
    Hope you understand my point.
     
    Make a perfect site, Oct 28, 2011 IP
  4. Icecube_media

    Icecube_media Peon

    Messages:
    656
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    thanks for the information ... this is helpful..
     
    Icecube_media, Oct 28, 2011 IP
  5. JamesColin

    JamesColin Prominent Member

    Messages:
    7,874
    Likes Received:
    164
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    395
    Digital Goods:
    1
    #5
    I'm sorry but I think I've spotted a miscalculation, you forgot the BS variable, it should read:
    Google's Score = (Kw Usage Score * 0.3) + (Domain * 0.25) + (PR Score * 0.25) + (Inbound Link Score * 0.25) + (User Data * 0.1) + (Content Quality Score * 0.1) + (Manual Boosts) - (Automated & Manual Penalties) + (BullShit score * 10)
     
    JamesColin, Oct 28, 2011 IP
  6. sweatlana

    sweatlana Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,086
    Likes Received:
    11
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #6
    Nice information. thanks mate.
     
    sweatlana, Oct 28, 2011 IP
  7. gowtham202

    gowtham202 Peon

    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    looks good.. but can you tell me the source???
     
    gowtham202, Oct 29, 2011 IP
  8. TurboSoul

    TurboSoul Peon

    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    thanx for shairing
     
    TurboSoul, Oct 29, 2011 IP
  9. Mist777

    Mist777 Member

    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    #9
    looks good, but where is the source
     
    Mist777, Oct 29, 2011 IP
  10. act4

    act4 Active Member

    Messages:
    38
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    91
    #10
    Until the OP can clarify a source nobody should consider this to be legit. I am sure google algorithm engineers are sworn to secrecy.
     
    act4, Oct 31, 2011 IP
  11. kellyphong

    kellyphong Peon

    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    Hahha. Yeah, dude missed the BS constraint for sure.

    okay come'on guys, the OP has used his mathematical mind and provided you information, atleast nicely say thanks to him/her.

    the formula is for sure not from google's end
     
    kellyphong, Oct 31, 2011 IP