1) http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/djst/archives/007158.html (Merry Christmas) 2) http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum100/27.htm (WMW) 3) http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum100/27-7-10.htm (WMW) 4) http://slashdot.org/articles/04/06/21/1150236.shtml?tid=126&tid=217&tid=95 (News about Hotmail blocking Gmail invites) 5) http://richardathome.no-ip.com/index.php?article_id=331 (Chat abuot unethical spammers) 6) http://atheism.about.com/library/FAQs/phil/blphil_eth_waranti.htm (Anti War) 7) http://www.mcse.ms/message1337215-3.html (Forum discussions about win XP passwords) 8) http://www.bradfallon.com/archives/2004_04_18_archive.html (Anti-google blog Post) 9) https://ssl.cpsr.org/pipermail/india-gii/2004-August/008211.html (Couldn't be arsed to find out, but it wasn't about Gmail) 10) http://www.physicsforums.com/archive/t-31832_Donate_a_Gmail_Invite.html (Someone begging for a Gmail invite) The search term I used was "Is G-mail unethical"... What were you expecting us to find anthony?
I don't know why you would post worthless links like those SE, especially the WMW links, those are about as worthless as an empty post. Maybe if you posted something relevant it would be better. http://news.com.com/California+Senate+approves+anti-Gmail+bill/2100-1028_3-5222062.html?tag=nefd.top
You siad... That was the results on a search for "Is Gmail Unethical"... You did ask me to let you know what I find... That was it.
Take it easy trigger. No need to go on the offensive. This doesn't show that anybody did anything wrong. The bill is actually in line with Google's practices. I know you can do better.
Read post # 80 over and over, make a large format digital print poster out of it, put it on your office wall, after reading it for a month or so you may gain wisdom. Just keep trying, one day you will understand my son...........
Where's the proof that Google commits this unethical practice? What you comment on is the "potential" of being unethical. Everybody and piece of software has the potential of being unethical. For example, virus protection software is the most invasive software there is. There is a lot of potential there for wrong doing on their part, but privacy doesn't seem to be an issue there. What's the difference?
So where do you wish to take the discussion? M$ with the control of anti-spyware, AV, firewalls, the Windows OS with automatic updates, software verification, search engine integrated into the browserless OS that automatically suggests sites to visit will be the greatest spyware system of all time. Not to mention hard drive search that will be integrated with M$ search. All search functions will be a spyware function knowing everything about you and your files to suggest more sources of information. Computing has become spying Bling.
http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=7819 http://www.webproworld.com/viewtopic.php?t=35977
I guess you have completed the circle, that is where this started again on DP anyway Minstrel. Thanks
Yeah. That was my point. This was a superfluous thread to start with sincve we already had one going here. Then it turned into a flame war and became even more superflous.
Concerning "That was my point", what are you referring to? Does it really matter if there is more than one conversation started?
If you are debating exactly the same issues (and then going off-topic to flame people to boot), yes. On most forums, the two threads would have been merged or a moderator would have posted a link to the main one and locked the second. You're raising points and questions here that were already addressed. And had been before you started this thread, for that matter.
If people are willing to talk about the same topic on more than one thread, what does it matter? If you want this thread to die because it's repeated, it would happen much quicker if you stopped posting to it. As far as flaming, I think we could all learn a little from what others think... http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=8534&page=1&pp=10