And we didn't go to the moon either Yes they do and for non-competitive fields there is really no difference but a supplemental result can never rank for a competitive field
Agreed. But most "tough terms" will be ones you have a lot of links to anyway. I think really large websites like forums and directories may always have supplementals now, unless they get a ton of PR to to the main page. Most forum pages and directory pages won't generate a lot of their own individual links.
Yes forums/shopping carts do have alot of supplemental pages at times however DP forums gets a lot of searches from google. They are mainly low competition which is long tail but they bring in people just the same. And the DP forums are setup SEF urls and everything which makes it easier to index and rank.
Getting out oin Suplemental results has a lot of proccess to Check like. Unique META TAGS (tittle & Description) "" Content and even your session IDs Goodluck!
I'm sorry but I don't quite quite understand what you mean there. Do you mean that there are no non patented algorithms that solve the same problem than LSI? Or do you question my credentials? Try googling "Contextual Network Graphs" for starters. I'll give you one couple of more hints why google is not using LSI: 1. you can't update part of the index using LSI, you have to rebuild the whole index at every single small update (like adding a new web page or updating indexed page) 2. LSI doesn't scale very well to large collections.
That blog post needs proof reading and was a bit lame. I was hoping for something original and researched.
Thats bull. Google builds their own dictionary and are DEFIANTLY smarter than you or you would own a search engine. They know what they are doing. Whether you believe they use LSI or not they do. It is a PROVEN fact. Don't go saying there is no way they can because Wikipedia used/still uses it.
Let's end the discussion here, there is no point in arguing about this especially if you have no idea what you are talking about - LSI has nothing to do with dictionaries. Do you even understant what LSI is? I'm however interested in how wikipedia uses LSI, could you please give an url about this? Wikipedia is open source so it's quite strange that they are using patented algorithms.
Okay forgive me for calling it a dictionary. Isn't a dictionary a list of words? Well LSI is different meanings of words. Such as pasta salad. How does google know what salad it is? Well other words such as macaroni, lasagna etc are related and if listed on the page will give google an idea what this 'salad' is. Wikipedia used/uses it the same way google does in search. Or so I heard. I never was able to confirm it but it was a reliable source. Whether they actually do or not I do KNOW google does.
not really sure about that... I have some content pages kicked out of Google Index IMO: Its all about internal factors - internal optimisation + some SEO tactics surely needed
Currently one way of getting out of the supplemental index is getting quality backlinks and great content