I was absolutely not offended ... just joking also. Being "blonde" is not always indicative to hair color or specific to the female gender for that matter
Matt Cutts commented on it... http://oraclewatch.eweek.com/blogs/google_watch/archive/2006/08/31/12873.aspx#12884 Hillarious. I wonder if they are any harder to get off...
If it's legit, it may in fact have merit. Notice lately you can't hover over an ad and get the url of the ad nor is there a url on most? How can ya block an ad you can identify without clicking it? Do no evil. LOL
Heh, I doubt she'll win this one. I haven't read the Google terms in a while, and I don't have an account with them, but doesn't it say you can't sue them (or a similar clause), just like 99% if not 100% of the TOS'es I've signed? -Edward
I guess when you spend that much time in school you become out of touch with reality and "common sense".
IMO she is either an attention seeking psycho or a complete idiot who knows nothing about the web. Well lets just wait to hear from the old lady. Oh & here's a question asked by Theresa Bradley, Psy.D: http://www.amnestyusa.org/askamnesty/live/display.php?topic=46 Scroll down on that page to read it.
Is she a psycho or what? It was her job to read the TOS/PP before applying for the program & not Google's to manually block those competing websites. It seems as if Ms. Bradley (in her opinion) was doing Google a favor by putting up adsense on her own website & that as if Google's the one to take care of every single aspect related to her account. Who knows she might'd have sued Google for not getting the cheque cashed on her behalf and for not doing her laundry. She is a very busy person, afterall. That I will. With all due respect, your website sucks!