Google PR update, again prove we are wrong

Discussion in 'Link Development' started by onlineimexpert, Jun 27, 2011.

0
  1. #1
    this days Google updated PR of all sites.

    70% of the sites have changed.

    and again Google prove that we are wrong about PR and the way we understand this parameter. some of you will notice a drop down in PR even when they have build a large quantity and good quality of backlinks. others will notice a major increase even if they do not build a lot of links.

    My sites for example changed according to the age of the sites, the old ones have lost PR value and the new ones have increased the PR value.

    My main site, and this one I promote hardly building hundreds of good quality High PR backlinks to it have lost PR but at the same time get better ranking on the SERPs position.

    One of the newest blogs I have, It's a few months old has jumped from PR0 to PR2 with only 300 to 700 backlinks

    So again I think that we do not need to pay any attention to the PR value but to the rankings.
     
    onlineimexpert, Jun 27, 2011 IP
  2. geester1

    geester1 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,250
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    #2
    Maybe the problem is that you are using an auto tool for seo (second link in sig), we have found our sites reasonably stable for the past few months rising constantly but all on page 1 of google, but we do not use any automated tools.
     
    geester1, Jun 28, 2011 IP
  3. osmasters

    osmasters Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    453
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    100
    #3
    Yesterday, my site's pagerank reached from 0 to 4 suddenly. Dont know how. I have not followed any link building services yet.
     
    osmasters, Jun 28, 2011 IP
  4. wiseman.wiseman05

    wiseman.wiseman05 Peon

    Messages:
    792
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    Having an unique content? Well the latest PR mostly ranked up those sites whose having a strong content rather than backlinks. That's why Google installed panda and observe the sites taking a long time to update the PR.
     
    wiseman.wiseman05, Jun 28, 2011 IP
  5. etc

    etc Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,235
    Likes Received:
    30
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    158
    #5
    my article directory which i think has no original content gained pr2, So exchanging links with related site still works.
     
    etc, Jun 28, 2011 IP
  6. markle

    markle Peon

    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    same as you my old site pr have come down why it has come down i dont know... i have doing link building regularly.
     
    markle, Jun 28, 2011 IP
  7. karthimx

    karthimx Prominent Member

    Messages:
    4,959
    Likes Received:
    127
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    340
    #7
    I think they have changed some algorithm again. As you said my old site also lost PR and new site gain PR.
     
    karthimx, Jun 28, 2011 IP
  8. Gevekay

    Gevekay Peon

    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    same here. old sites lost the PR and very new sites jumped from 0 to 2 and 0 to 3.
     
    Gevekay, Jun 28, 2011 IP
  9. SoftDev

    SoftDev Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    589
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    130
    #9
    my new site's jumped from 0 to 3.
     
    SoftDev, Jun 29, 2011 IP
  10. colecov

    colecov Guest

    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    All of my sites stayed the same or went up. The weird thing is that a stupid site I've had for about 2 years with no real content and all images went from PR0 to PR3. I've never done any link building for this site. It's just a Hot or Not clone site that I put up for fun one day. PR3??? Okay.....
     
    colecov, Jun 29, 2011 IP