Google Posts guidelines that their raters use. Cliff notes version

Discussion in 'Google' started by conceptsti, Mar 1, 2013.

  1. #1


    Link to PDF: http://static.googleusercontent.com/external_content/untrusted_dlcp/www.google.com/en/us/insidesearch/howsearchworks/assets/searchqualityevaluatorguidelines.pdf


    Article: http://www.webpronews.com/google-posts-big-search-quality-rating-guidelines-document-says-its-just-the-cliffs-notes-version-of-the-real-thing-2013-03


    The most interesting part of the pdf are:
    Tips for Recognizing Spam Pages
    Fake Blogs with PPC Ads
    Commercial Intent

    Recognizing Thin Affiliates
    Recognizing True Merchants



     
    conceptsti, Mar 1, 2013 IP
    dhanjit, christian231 and davidness like this.
  2. imfusa

    imfusa Active Member

    Messages:
    694
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    70
    #2
    The "Rating factor" of the Google Algorithm it should not make that much importance in the algorithm.
    I am saying this because it can be very easy exploited. The important factors should be the relevance and quality of the backlinks, the originality of the content, page speed and if the site has a friendly design. Other factors that should also be took in consideration should be the number of minutes/hours that user stays on the site (not on a single page) and the interactivity of the site with the user along with the number of ads placed on the website (the more ads are placed on the site - the more should get the site penalized even if the site owner have added an "external nofollow" to the link/banner ad.
     
    imfusa, Mar 2, 2013 IP
  3. rakesh.swaransoft

    rakesh.swaransoft Greenhorn

    Messages:
    119
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    18
    #3
    its not about google ranking its about how google raters rate a URL. thanks for the very nice post.
     
    rakesh.swaransoft, Mar 8, 2013 IP