Google Panda 2.2 coming soon!

Google going to update the Panda algorithm once more time.After Google Panda 1.0,Google Panda 2.0,Google Panda 2.1 now its time for another tweak in panda algorithm which could be version of Google Panda 2.2!

​

In SMX advanced conference Search Engine Land’s Danny Sullivan’s “You & A” conversation with Google’s Matt Cutts,the news about Google 2.2 news got a confirmation from Matt Cutts.Here is part of this conversation where we got this Panda 2.2 version news:

“Danny Sullivan: Where are we now? Panda 2, Panda 2.1 … are we at Panda 2.2?

Matt Cutts: There’s another change coming soon. I don’t know when we’ll launch fully internationally, not just in English.

Danny Sullivan: Panda works on a site basis. Danny asks about manual exceptions.

Matt Cutts: We haven’t made any manual exceptions. Cult of Mac might have been confused because they started getting all this new traffic from blogging about it, but we haven’t made any manual exceptions.

Danny Sullivan: Has it changed enough that some people have recovered? Or is it too soon?

Matt Cutts: The general rule is to push stuff out and then find additional signals to help differentiate on the spectrum. We haven’t done any pushes that would directly pull things back. We have recomputed data that might have impacted some sites. There’s one change that might affect sites and pull things back.

Danny Sullivan: You guys made this post with 22 questions, but it sounds like you’re saying even if you’ve done that, it wouldn’t have helped yet?

Matt Cutts: It could help as we recompute data. Matt goes on to say that Panda 2.2 has been approved but hasn’t rolled out yet.”

So another hope coming for those who unnecessarily victimized by the panda algorithm , that this panda version will help (IMO).Another point comes from Matt Cutts that those who following the tips of Google panda, will get a recovery.Now we have to wait and watch how Google Panda 2.2 version effect the entire Google search world!

Published By Anirban Das,Zebra Techies,Calcutta,SEO India​

 

Just had a look on those tips. Yes, I agree with it. So, we've to give much importance on the quality of the content.

 

"quality of the content. "+ social engagement

 

Thanks for post men!

 

Thanks a lot for the post. CONTENT IS KING hence forth!!!!

 

So, as for non english speaking sites the coming date is unkwnon...

 

Nice updated post by seo point of view

 

Thanks for the SEO tips. It’s really nice.

 

Here is some advices from Google to avoid and recovery from Google panda next update

Google’s Advice:

• Would you trust the information presented in this article?
• Is this article written by an expert or enthusiast who knows the topic well, or is it more shallow in nature?
• Does the site have duplicate, overlapping, or redundant articles on the same or similar topics with slightly different keyword variations?
• Would you be comfortable giving your credit card information to this site?
• Does this article have spelling, stylistic, or factual errors?
• Are the topics driven by genuine interests of readers of the site, or does the site generate content by attempting to guess what might rank well in search engines?
• Does the article provide original content or information, original reporting, original research, or original analysis?
• Does the page provide substantial value when compared to other pages in search results?
• How much quality control is done on content?
• Does the article describe both sides of a story?
• Is the site a recognized authority on its topic?
• Is the content mass-produced by or outsourced to a large number of creators, or spread across a large network of sites, so that individual pages or sites don’t get as much attention or care?
• Was the article edited well, or does it appear sloppy or hastily produced?
• For a health related query, would you trust information from this site?
• Would you recognize this site as an authoritative source when mentioned by name?
• Does this article provide a complete or comprehensive description of the topic?
• Does this article contain insightful analysis or interesting information that is beyond obvious?
• Is this the sort of page you’d want to bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend?
• Does this article have an excessive amount of ads that distract from or interfere with the main content?
• Would you expect to see this article in a printed magazine, encyclopedia or book?
• Are the articles short, unsubstantial, or otherwise lacking in helpful specifics?
• Are the pages produced with great care and attention to detail vs. less attention to detail?
• Would users complain when they see pages from this site?