Google Loosing Race

Discussion in 'Google' started by seoindia, Aug 23, 2005.

  1. minstrel

    minstrel Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    15,082
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #21
    Yeah, me too. I almost stopped right after "seoindia".
     
    minstrel, Aug 23, 2005 IP
  2. toocoolforschool

    toocoolforschool Peon

    Messages:
    466
    Likes Received:
    31
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #22
    Eh, what's the point predicting that Googs will "fall" in 4-5 years? What matters is that RIGHT NOW they are king of the hill. What are you going to do, SEO all your sites for 4-5 years in the future???

    The premise of this thread was foolish to begin with.
     
    toocoolforschool, Aug 23, 2005 IP
  3. toocoolforschool

    toocoolforschool Peon

    Messages:
    466
    Likes Received:
    31
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #23
    Yeah you know, for someone who is supposedly in the SEO business, I've seen "seoindia" ask some pretty noobish questions on this board. :rolleyes:
     
    toocoolforschool, Aug 23, 2005 IP
  4. markhutch

    markhutch Peon

    Messages:
    357
    Likes Received:
    22
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #24
    Google has spent a lot of time and money getting the phrase "google it" into television shows and movies. It's like a new version of product placement. Pretty smart on their part, I think.
     
    markhutch, Aug 24, 2005 IP
  5. elkiwi

    elkiwi Active Member

    Messages:
    536
    Likes Received:
    34
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    68
    #25
    It's like English people saying "I've got to do the hoovering" or

    "Can you xerox this for me..."



    This is what most marketing people dream of for their product.
     
    elkiwi, Aug 24, 2005 IP
  6. gford

    gford Peon

    Messages:
    1,188
    Likes Received:
    33
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #26
    OK. We need a nice smilie for rofl. Because that one made me do it!

    ;) :D :p
     
    gford, Aug 24, 2005 IP
  7. toocoolforschool

    toocoolforschool Peon

    Messages:
    466
    Likes Received:
    31
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #27
    I had a discussion about this with someone here a little while back. We weren't entirely sure if Google was the one who paid for all the references to them, or if screenwriters/TV writers just picked up that the word "google" is funny and ran with it, and it just snowballed after that. Now, those Apple laptops you see on every movie is definitely product placement. But those lines about Google and "google it"? I personally think it just sort of caught on, and became a phenomenon.
     
    toocoolforschool, Aug 24, 2005 IP
  8. sc67

    sc67 Peon

    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #28
    From my experience Google is the hardest to work with from the site admin point of view. MSN is the fastest at getting new pages indexed and Yahoo is the easiest at submitting new sites for directory inclusion. From the Searcher point of view I still find Google to be the best. However, their recent moves into other areas of the online arena make me wonder if their are losing the search focus that made them the industry leader.
     
    sc67, Aug 28, 2005 IP
  9. minstrel

    minstrel Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    15,082
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #29
    While I understand the worry about that happening, I don't think it will in Google's case, at least not in the foreseeable future, and I don't see any evidence of it to this point. I think we need to remember that as they get richer and richer they are also expanding their "bench", adding new talent all the time.
     
    minstrel, Aug 28, 2005 IP
  10. upside

    upside Peon

    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #30
    The whole thing is more and more about branding. People use google as a verb, but Yahoo makes more money. Normal people have absolutely no idea that each SE returns almost totally differnt results. And they don't care. They get the information they're looking for, or they get their own little weather report and movie times, or the search box came bundled on the machine. Most people have no idea really, and it's only people who hang around boards like this that really care about and notice relevance. It is not nearly this frustrating or important for everyone else. That's too bad.
     
    upside, Aug 28, 2005 IP
  11. Old Welsh Guy

    Old Welsh Guy Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,699
    Likes Received:
    291
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    #31


    I was about to post something along these lines, but thought it better to check out the entire thread before doing so..

    When Google came along, Altavista was god, as you rightly said!

    In reply to the original post, think on this.

    Gogle get just under 50% of the search traffic, so how come they can deliver around 80% of web referrals? They are hardly crap are they? Yahoo also gets roughly 50% (they are both late forties in reality) yet Yahoo mostly delivers 20% or less. This makes Google four times more effective in my mind anyhow.
     
    Old Welsh Guy, Aug 28, 2005 IP
  12. Bender

    Bender Peon

    Messages:
    1,403
    Likes Received:
    358
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #32
    Here is a nice article:

    http://www.technologyreview[dot][com]/articles/05/01/issue/ferguson0105.asp
     
    Bender, Aug 28, 2005 IP
  13. minstrel

    minstrel Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    15,082
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #33
    Very well said. Exactly my feeling. For my sites, Yahoo isn't even number 2 in terms of traffic. Most months it's about fourth in line.
     
    minstrel, Aug 28, 2005 IP
  14. dejaone

    dejaone Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    992
    Likes Received:
    30
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    143
    #34
    some sites get 70-90% of traffic from Google. This doesn't make google more effective in delivering traffric. Sandbox makes most of new sites get zero traffic while a small percentage of old sites get lot of traffic.
     
    dejaone, Aug 28, 2005 IP
  15. skattabrain

    skattabrain Peon

    Messages:
    628
    Likes Received:
    18
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #35
    skattabrain, Aug 28, 2005 IP
  16. Blogmaster

    Blogmaster Blood Type Dating Affiliate Manager

    Messages:
    25,924
    Likes Received:
    1,354
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    380
    #36
    I don't see Google losing the race anytime soon. Google is still the popular search engine regardless how easy it is to get ranked in msn. What matters is what the people want, and Google gives it to them more than any other search engine on earth. Many web industry people get mad at Google, but that is because of the business we are in. Overall Google is improving and continuing to provide everyday people with what they are looking for, and that is what keeps them on top :)
     
    Blogmaster, Aug 28, 2005 IP