Sources : http://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&ct...eQr7zpZEUZNrjlgWA&sig2=wL7qL8OJql0ACY4NxAsAMA http://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&ct...CqcmdzEJ5dg5Xbd8g&sig2=EDVb0Tk63q9xVWnDy5YAmw http://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&ct...OeXnsa87AniPEpzKA&sig2=1omeEtIE-OmzNzO-3d14fQ I have found some contradictory sources .
This blog has one post and this is it. There is zero creditable sources, waste of my bandwidth. This is lame link bait and spam at best. -REP
Why is every one so worried,,,,get out of directories if you have them and start focusing on content and specifically relevant links
I think you're right, but I won't burn a red rep on him. I would send you some green rep, but I need to spread it around first.
regardless of the source of this story, I am suspecting that outbound links may have been used to discredit a site in googles algorithm recently it is unfortunate that google would do it that way..... actually the whole linking system as a relevancy factor pretty much sucks
Hoping so. And google should release a concrete expanation on what is the basis for the PR leak system.
Question for all you Guru's this sounds pretty logical to me as I added a news feed to my site which added about 30 pages of semi-relevant info to my site, but as these are RSS feeds they all have links to the full stories, 2 days after adding this I have dropped out of the top 10 for all my keywords The problem is my users like the news feature, can I put something in my .htaccess or on my template like a nofollow? will this decrease my outbound links?
Very interesting. I have experienced something similar. I think RSS feeds are a bad thing for a site anyways, as they are so abused by spammy no content types of sites where the lazy webmaster sets up a site and lets it run on feeds with the hope that they will get indexed for next to no work. I think this might be something we have to accept as a necessary evil, as they need to do something to de-index all the garbage content that is out there.