There's a PDF file on an old website I worked on years ago which had some pictures in it that had names meta-tagged to them, and a seperate HTML page which had an image gallery with a few pictures of people (old staff), and their names were written in the caption. One of the images used in the PDF belongs to a series of images used in the image gallery, so they're somewhat related. We were asked by one of those people to remove their name from the image gallery, which we did about 3 months ago (we left out his name but kept the other people's names), but for some odd reason, the pictures still show up in Google image when doing a search of this person's name. The PDF file cannot have the image removed (which this person acknowledged and OK'ed) but we modified his name (removed initials basically) and he was happy with that. Since the image in the PDF file belongs to the image gallery, is Google creating a link between these two and still tagging them together, even though I've removed his name from the image gallery? What could be causing Google to still see his name if I've removed it from the caption in the gallery? It seems Google still associates the PDF image (where this guy's 'modified' name is written) to the image gallery (where his name is not written at all). We basically see all 4 images (3 from gallery and 1 which is a repeat from the gallery and the PDF). So I'm confused. Do you think that if I altogether changed the names of the actual image files in the gallery (completely renamed them to something else), it would stop Google from associating the image in the PDF to them? Are there any tools out there that exist to analyze images or PDF files for tags?