Google - Enabled Attribute Importance

Discussion in 'Google' started by roiei, Jul 5, 2006.

  1. #1
    Maybe you saw it ...

    Link Popularity
    - Links from other sites
    - Link and surrounding text analysis 35%

    Title
    - 25%

    URL & File Name
    - http://keyword.url.com/
    - http://www.keyword.co.uk/
    - http://url.tv/keyword_phrase.html
    10%

    Heading Tags
    Keyword Phrase
    -Ancillary Phrase
    10%
    Body Text
    8%

    Images
    - ALT text
    - File name 7%

    On-Page Link Analysis
    - Link URL and file names
    - Link text (if text link)
    - Link ALT text (if image link) 5%

    Total Algorithm Score: 100%
     
    roiei, Jul 5, 2006 IP
  2. MattUK

    MattUK Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,950
    Likes Received:
    377
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    275
    #2
    where is this from?
     
    MattUK, Jul 5, 2006 IP
  3. keyz

    keyz Peon

    Messages:
    298
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    Yes, do post a link.
     
    keyz, Jul 5, 2006 IP
  4. RedCardinal

    RedCardinal Peon

    Messages:
    349
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    "Let’s try to understand what Google "sees" when it analyzes a Web page. The percentages are only estimates - the real Google algorithm is much more complex, and is surely weighted much differently than what is crudely summarized in the table to the right."

    Found in same article as above - author's name Randy Gullickson.

    just google it I suppose!
     
    RedCardinal, Jul 5, 2006 IP
  5. MattUK

    MattUK Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,950
    Likes Received:
    377
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    275
    #5
    MattUK, Jul 5, 2006 IP
  6. mad4

    mad4 Peon

    Messages:
    6,986
    Likes Received:
    493
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    Google has 100-300 ranking factors.
     
    mad4, Jul 5, 2006 IP
  7. adpd

    adpd Guest

    Messages:
    150
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    I would love to know the sources for these statements.

    mad4, where did you get that information from?
     
    adpd, Jul 5, 2006 IP
  8. roiei

    roiei Banned

    Messages:
    842
    Likes Received:
    18
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    roiei, Jul 5, 2006 IP
  9. CrankyDave

    CrankyDave Peon

    Messages:
    280
    Likes Received:
    23
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    It was an article submitted to searchwarp in 2004.

    Dave
     
    CrankyDave, Jul 5, 2006 IP
  10. Travis

    Travis Peon

    Messages:
    539
    Likes Received:
    15
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    2004 was 10 years ago in search engine time.

    Seems a little bit too simple to be anything that Google would use, they've got to be one step ahead of spammers and tricksters at all times, and what was posted above is easily minipulated.
     
    Travis, Jul 5, 2006 IP
  11. Endurer

    Endurer Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,113
    Likes Received:
    84
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #11
    thats way too obsolete mate.
     
    Endurer, Jul 5, 2006 IP
  12. gianinydw

    gianinydw Peon

    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    thats way too obsolete mate.
     
    gianinydw, Jul 7, 2006 IP
  13. mad4

    mad4 Peon

    Messages:
    6,986
    Likes Received:
    493
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    Somebody has already said that, I think.:rolleyes:
     
    mad4, Jul 7, 2006 IP
  14. MattUK

    MattUK Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,950
    Likes Received:
    377
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    275
    #14
    LOL, that's brilliant! You seem to have an echo Endurer
     
    MattUK, Jul 7, 2006 IP