Google and yahoo might be taking another step against low-quality sites

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by Avatar7, Aug 10, 2006.

  1. qwestcommunications

    qwestcommunications Notable Member

    Messages:
    8,868
    Likes Received:
    172
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    233
    #2
    I guess natural linking and PR sites linking willd determine "quality" of a site.
     
    qwestcommunications, Aug 10, 2006 IP
  2. dastuff

    dastuff Peon

    Messages:
    475
    Likes Received:
    18
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    Probably just the beginning of google trying to weed out the masses of MFA sites out there.
     
    dastuff, Aug 10, 2006 IP
  3. Lightning-Software

    Lightning-Software Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    204
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    110
    #4
    The biggest line I read in that article is that if retailers organic rankings go down, they will spend more on ppc to stay or increase current internet sales. This would suggest that information sites will not be hurt at all but that retailers will be. I did not see any type of solution for this problem in the article, only suggestions that things will keep on going the way they currently are.

    Google not having a "hard definition of a quality site" means they have no solution to the current spam problems. What is the difference between a retailer selling online the same product someone is selling through an amazon affiliate account? Are affliate accounts spam? I can take my amazon feed and populate 100000 products in my ecommerce store overnight, brick and mortar online retailers can't. It's hard to draw a line in the sand with the beach always changing. No one can control the tide on the internet at this point.
     
    Lightning-Software, Aug 10, 2006 IP