Google acknowledges problems with site: query

Discussion in 'Google' started by minstrel, May 19, 2006.

  1. SEO Jeff

    SEO Jeff Active Member

    Messages:
    534
    Likes Received:
    17
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #141
    If the site: operator is fixed then Google has done a half ass job at fixing it because I still see large number of pages missing. Great job Google. I truely hope Billy Gates goes after Brinn and Page.
     
    SEO Jeff, Jun 2, 2006 IP
  2. sGroup

    sGroup Peon

    Messages:
    261
    Likes Received:
    16
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #142
    Billy has already said it was his worst mistake to not persue search early on!
     
    sGroup, Jun 2, 2006 IP
  3. SEO Jeff

    SEO Jeff Active Member

    Messages:
    534
    Likes Received:
    17
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #143

    I know they are truely working on killing Google :D but in the mean time we webmasters are screwed because of Google.
     
    SEO Jeff, Jun 2, 2006 IP
  4. Nintendo

    Nintendo ♬ King of da Wackos ♬

    Messages:
    12,890
    Likes Received:
    1,064
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    430
    #144
    Sure not 100% fixed for me.

    Example 196 vs 19,600 depending on the DC. Allmost all my sites are like that. Bad in google.com but have normal datacenter results.
     
    Nintendo, Jun 3, 2006 IP
  5. gworld

    gworld Prominent Member

    Messages:
    11,324
    Likes Received:
    615
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #145
    The Datacenters are still showing 27600 as before for me, the only problem is that it is old indexed pages and not the new ones but google.com is showing 251,000 pages which is interesting since this morning was showing 50. :rolleyes:
     
    gworld, Jun 3, 2006 IP
  6. minstrel

    minstrel Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    15,082
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #146
    I'm looking at two different sites of mine and they both show that pattern - lots of old pages, most no longer existing, instead of newer pages that do actually exist.

    Good work, Google! Competition for the Wayback Machine? :rolleyes:

    Maybe Google has decided they can't beat Microsoft so they're going after Alta Vista again. :D
     
    minstrel, Jun 3, 2006 IP
  7. gford

    gford Peon

    Messages:
    1,188
    Likes Received:
    33
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #147
    Minstrel,

    Oh wait! I am sure Matt Cutts could post how this is because of your bad linking habits! It CAN NOT be Google! They don't make mistakes, you do!

    Disclaimer: this post is complete sarcasm and disgust at the google attempts to blame webmasters for their bugs
     
    gford, Jun 3, 2006 IP
    minstrel likes this.
  8. LaCabra

    LaCabra Goats R Us

    Messages:
    1,954
    Likes Received:
    241
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #148
    I'm fluxing between 5xx pages one day and 129K the next ... i've given up on the issue and have decided to move on and deal with it in other ways. Also PR fanatics ... don't expect any PR update for a while ... looong while.
     
    LaCabra, Jun 3, 2006 IP
  9. gford

    gford Peon

    Messages:
    1,188
    Likes Received:
    33
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #149
    My Feb-Mar 06 supp cache dates are now july-august 2005. hehe. its going backwards! :p
     
    gford, Jun 3, 2006 IP
  10. markhutch

    markhutch Peon

    Messages:
    357
    Likes Received:
    22
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #150
    I think I've seen Google do this before when something they tried didn't work out as planned. It's like they put old data back into the system for "googlebot" to work through. Maybe this has something to do with the system changes deleting new content, so the only way to find it again using their linking system might be to go back to when they believe it was working right, put the old pages back in and let "gbot" try and fix the problem using a hopefully fixed set of new commands?
     
    markhutch, Jun 3, 2006 IP
    minstrel likes this.
  11. minstrel

    minstrel Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    15,082
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #151
    That's as good an explanation as anything else I've seen to date, markhutch. Sort of like "System Restore" in Windows - roll it back to the "last good boot".
     
    minstrel, Jun 3, 2006 IP
  12. markhutch

    markhutch Peon

    Messages:
    357
    Likes Received:
    22
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #152
    Minstrel, I hope that's the case and things get fixed before long. I try and look at this current Google situtation through logical eyes, but it seems like every time I do that I end up with a migraine headache!
     
    markhutch, Jun 3, 2006 IP
  13. minstrel

    minstrel Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    15,082
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #153
    I know. As I was saying at another forum this morning, lately every time I see a statement from anyone at Google implying either that the problem is now fixed or that it's all a result of unscrupulous webmasters, I get angry.
     
    minstrel, Jun 3, 2006 IP
  14. LaCabra

    LaCabra Goats R Us

    Messages:
    1,954
    Likes Received:
    241
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #154
    You're now allowed to visit other forums ... I GET ANGRY!!! ;)
     
    LaCabra, Jun 3, 2006 IP
  15. digiseek

    digiseek Peon

    Messages:
    283
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #155
    even mine slowly recovering...hope i will get all my indexed pages as before..:(
     
    digiseek, Jun 3, 2006 IP
  16. nddb

    nddb Peon

    Messages:
    803
    Likes Received:
    30
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #156
    I agree, it's a helluva lot more than the "site query operator" coz traffic has dropped big time. And 800,000 pages to 300 over the course of a couple months... that's something different than a minor glitch in JUST that query. There has to be more going on... I wish I could figure out why google hates me now :mad: :mad: :mad:
     
    nddb, Jun 3, 2006 IP
  17. LaCabra

    LaCabra Goats R Us

    Messages:
    1,954
    Likes Received:
    241
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #157
    Does anyone have any samples of sites where their number of indexed pages have maintained their level or increased? I suspect that 95% of sites are experiencing some kind of loss.
     
    LaCabra, Jun 4, 2006 IP
  18. Cristian Mezei

    Cristian Mezei Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,332
    Likes Received:
    355
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    213
    #158
    Cristian Mezei, Jun 4, 2006 IP
  19. LaCabra

    LaCabra Goats R Us

    Messages:
    1,954
    Likes Received:
    241
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #159
    thanks expertu i'll take a look. Has that site ever fluxed - lost and then recoverd or has it just not been hit?
     
    LaCabra, Jun 4, 2006 IP
  20. LaCabra

    LaCabra Goats R Us

    Messages:
    1,954
    Likes Received:
    241
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #160
    Expertu .. that site, for me, is showing ...

    Current indexed pages at 503 (June 4, 2006)
    Maximum indexed pages at 33,000 (August 8, 2005)

    some of the DCs are currently showing 15K pages indexed so I think this site is also affected.
     
    LaCabra, Jun 4, 2006 IP