1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

Google acknowledges problems with site: query

Discussion in 'Google' started by minstrel, May 19, 2006.

  1. Obelia

    Obelia Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,083
    Likes Received:
    171
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    210
    #21
    I've had two sites lose indexed pages. One of them is really small, but all the newer content-rich pages have disappeared, so it's not a duplicate issue. Nothing that Matt Cutts mentioned so far seems to fit this site. It actually doesn't do badly for links either. The only thing I can figure is that it's one of my newer sites, so its links in are also fairly new. The same is true for the other site of mine that was affected.

    So from the experience of my own sites, I have to agree with Minstrel. Something looks broken, or at least isn't making much sense.

    Just a random stab in the dark: is this deindexing affecting sites that have obtained links from other sites that have low traffic? In other words, are Google using toolbar data to judge the value of an inbound link, and discounting those links that show low traffic?
     
    Obelia, May 20, 2006 IP
  2. minstrel

    minstrel Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    15,082
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #22
    Doing that wouldn't make a lot of sense to me although it's possible.

    I don't believe Google is stupid or crazy. I don't really believe they have this mess on their hands because they don't know what they're doing. I think they tried to do something big (as in BIG Daddy) and something they didn't anticipate when badly awry - and either they don't yet know what caused it or they don't yet know how to fix it or whatever it takes to fix it is a major job that is simply taking a long time (e.g., hardware issues).

    I'd be happy if they'd just admit it's a mess and let us know they're trying to fix it, like the sitemaps team sort of did, instead of trying to snow us and claim it's all because of black- or gray-hat SEO.
     
    minstrel, May 20, 2006 IP
  3. onedollar

    onedollar SEO Consultant for Hire

    Messages:
    3,481
    Likes Received:
    333
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #23
    so finally, they accepted it
     
    onedollar, May 20, 2006 IP
  4. Caios

    Caios Peon

    Messages:
    189
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #24
    Man, this is annoying. With the current situation I cant get motivated to do any work on my site.
     
    Caios, May 20, 2006 IP
  5. emil2k

    emil2k Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,391
    Likes Received:
    80
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    138
    #25
    Yah check this graph of one of my sites which mainly got its traffic from Google look at the stats over the last 30 days and the recent fall with the indexed pages fall...

    [​IMG]

    I'm pretty pissed and dissapointed the site was extremely stable as you can see from the graph :(

    Lets see what happens :cool:

    Emil
     
    emil2k, May 20, 2006 IP
  6. LaCabra

    LaCabra Goats R Us

    Messages:
    1,954
    Likes Received:
    241
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #26
    Nice graph emil...what program are you using to generate that?
     
    LaCabra, May 20, 2006 IP
  7. emil2k

    emil2k Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,391
    Likes Received:
    80
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    138
    #27
    StatCounter
     
    emil2k, May 20, 2006 IP
    LaCabra likes this.
  8. Imperium

    Imperium Peon

    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #28
    Thanks for sharing and I agree with most comments that something has gone very bad and they are in the dark for now.

    Here is my concern: not only we will lose traffic and revenue from serps due to (de)indexing mess and a whole lot of backlinks aswell. So why all the effort if pages with our backlinks are disappearing? This can cause many PR and serp drops. Maybe a conspiracy to get us drawn to AdWords hehe :) I just hope they get it fixed asap as this index-drop is costing us webmasters a cajillion. :(

    cheers
     
    Imperium, May 20, 2006 IP
  9. Obelia

    Obelia Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,083
    Likes Received:
    171
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    210
    #29
    I suspect the whole BIG bit means this time they altered a whole bunch of different factors at once, and this is what is causing so much confusion. I don't think they're in a position to make changes one at a time, the way you would normally write a programme, because they don't want to risk SEOs figuring out their secret sauce.

    My speculation with the toolbar data affecting links is because Brett Tabke dropped some big hints that this has been in use for some time. Not that he works for Google, but you'd think he knows more than most. Although there's some kind of patent, I believe, that stops Google from using toolbar data directly to affect ranking.
     
    Obelia, May 20, 2006 IP
  10. Caios

    Caios Peon

    Messages:
    189
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #30
    That graph shows the affects this is having on people incomes. Has anyone seen this issue in any main stream press articles? Why aren’t any business federations asking google questions or discussing loss of revenue with the media?
     
    Caios, May 20, 2006 IP
  11. minstrel

    minstrel Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    15,082
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #31
    Exactly. If you change a few lines of code in a program or web page script and it doesn't work, no big deal - you change it back. But if you rewrite the entire program and it doesn't work, you usually have invested way too much to just throw it away - you start debugging it - and that can be a long and arduous process. I think that's where they are now.

    No. HE thinks he knows more than most. But then Brett Tabke has been a legend in his own mind for a long time.
     
    minstrel, May 20, 2006 IP
  12. markhutch

    markhutch Peon

    Messages:
    357
    Likes Received:
    22
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #32
    Isn't this the same guy that banned all SE's about six months ago via robots.txt only to change his mind about a month later after his site lost about 50% of its visitors?
     
    markhutch, May 20, 2006 IP
  13. Helmethead3

    Helmethead3 Peon

    Messages:
    130
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #33
    Pages de-indexed...thats scary.

    Only thing which makes me happy is, i thought I'd just hit the sandbox in a big and mixed up way.

    Good to know we are all in the same boat! The frightening thing however is we are subject to googles harsh seas, and sadly I'm not sure if anyone's paddling for us.

    Google has probably received a million emails about de-indexing this week.
    Well now it's a million and one because I just finished sending big G my sos email, because simply de-indexing all our pages (except our home pages) means our barb wire canoe is sinking rapidly, and I can't swim!!

    Diversify in marketing & traffic stragtegies? Give me a break, webmasters rely heavily on their search results. We make sites, we spend money on their adword systems, we literally are the reason why results show up when people use there search engine. Without us, their would be no need for site searching systems, there would be no sites to index!

    Lets hope they Re-Index ASAP! (Courtwins aren't running in there favour lately.)
     
    Helmethead3, May 21, 2006 IP
  14. Keone

    Keone Peon

    Messages:
    232
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #34
    If a lot of us are loosing indexed pages and see a huge decrease in traffic because of that -- then who is winning? --

    I bet Google is loosing money because of this too.

    probably also the reason why they are not informing us about it.

    even if it did result in better search results Google will do something about it. They are not just about good search results. They are smarter than that

    Things will clear up. In time

    mho
     
    Keone, May 21, 2006 IP
  15. gford

    gford Peon

    Messages:
    1,188
    Likes Received:
    33
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #35
    Not sure they are losing money. There are still the same # of searches a day, so they land on someone elses page with adsense. They make money either way.

    They would only be losing money if only all/most adsense sites were hit and non-adsense sites were not hit.

     
    gford, May 21, 2006 IP
  16. NetMidWest

    NetMidWest Peon

    Messages:
    1,677
    Likes Received:
    151
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #36
    I hate to be the one to defend Matt Cutts, but:
    Nintendo and I have both seen changes in this, so it may simply take some time for all sites to see changes. I do wonder what the blog meant by 'punctuation' however... and how it might affect filenames - ie question marks, equal signs and etc.

    Can anyone with more than one hyphen in the domain name see changes at this time?

    You should perhaps compare allinurl:www domain.com to site:www domain.com to see how badly you may truly be affected by de-indexing.
     
    NetMidWest, May 21, 2006 IP
  17. minstrel

    minstrel Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    15,082
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #37
    OK. So how are you defending Matt Cutts? Or how is what he said accurate? He's claiming that by May 6 part of the problem was fixed and that by May 13 the rest of the fix would be in. He also goes on in that blog to look at the issue of pages dropping out of the index, blames it on shady linking practices, and claims THAT problem is also fixed. BS. There are many sites with no shady linking practices that are affected and the damn problem is not even close to getting fixed.

    Now, the Sitemaps groups is admitting to continuing problems on May 19 or 20, though Cutts is claiming a couple of weeks earlier that the problem is fixed. And now it's May 21 and there are still major problems.

    I may be easy to fool at times but I know a smokescreen and a bafflegab exercise when I see one.
     
    minstrel, May 21, 2006 IP
  18. digitalcamera

    digitalcamera Banned

    Messages:
    112
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #38
    Here is a bit of a hilarious thing um you say you have site pages drop ok I have this site with 4 thousand pages, google site shows over 13,000 or so lol explain that one.
     
    digitalcamera, May 21, 2006 IP
  19. emil2k

    emil2k Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,391
    Likes Received:
    80
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    138
    #39
    So is anybody seeing signs of improvement?

    Also anybody know a tool that shows indexed pages by DC? I found it once then lost it... :D

    Emil
     
    emil2k, May 21, 2006 IP
  20. NetMidWest

    NetMidWest Peon

    Messages:
    1,677
    Likes Received:
    151
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #40
    I do agree, it is alot of smoke and mirrors. But the one thing I did come away with that was handy, since I recently started a site with a hyphenated domain that was being crawled like hell but not indexed, was the part about hyphenated domain names... and then the site jumped over 10,000 pages from less than 800.

    I have a real love/hate relationship with Google, and it is extending to Matt Cutts. ("I hate to be the one to defend Matt Cutts") But you also have to wonder what he is privy to, since he had no idea that the crawl caching proxy servers were online from the start of BigDaddy, and if they are keeping him in the dark on that... what else?

    The blog you started this thread over is dated the 19th, the Indexing Timeline was posted the 16th, he states there was a quick fix in place that I can confirm, and that "...a full fix for site: queries on hyphenated domains in supplemental results expected this week."

    What bothers me about Vanessa Fox's posting is "Some particular ones you may have noticed" and "site: queries for a domain with punctuation" (the example gives a hyphenated domain). I can't see how this would not affect filenames, and a serious decline in urls with "?" and "=" in them. And where else might this problem have been duplicated? Crawling? Caching? Indexing?

    What is it we did not notice?
     
    NetMidWest, May 21, 2006 IP