1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

Good Source For Cloaking

Discussion in 'Site & Server Administration' started by UnEmployedAfterSchool, Jul 5, 2006.

  1. #1
    Any good source out there for cloaking?
    SEMrush
     
    UnEmployedAfterSchool, Jul 5, 2006 IP
    SEMrush
  2. fsmedia

    fsmedia Prominent Member

    Messages:
    5,165
    Likes Received:
    262
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    390
    #2
    Cloaking will get you banned from Google, it's not a good idea.
     
    fsmedia, Jul 5, 2006 IP
  3. mdvaldosta

    mdvaldosta Peon

    Messages:
    4,079
    Likes Received:
    362
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    mdvaldosta, Jul 5, 2006 IP
  4. SEOEgghead

    SEOEgghead Peon

    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    If cloaking is dead, why is the New York Times doing it?

    I posted useful info here:
    http://www.seoegghead.com/blog/seo/simple-cloak-php-library-p34.html
    http://www.seoegghead.com/blog/seo/the-google-cloaking-hypocrisy-p32.html

    Someone please quote me and make those links active as I'm still under the threshhold for live links.

    I do agree, however, that cloaking should not be your first choice for solving and problem. But cliche statements like "cloaking is so 1990s" are not appropriate at all.

    --J
     
    SEOEgghead, Jul 5, 2006 IP
  5. NoobieDoobieDo

    NoobieDoobieDo Peon

    Messages:
    1,456
    Likes Received:
    53
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5

    i agree ... thanks for the links
     
    NoobieDoobieDo, Jul 5, 2006 IP
  6. SEOEgghead

    SEOEgghead Peon

    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    I'm actually enhancing the script and releasing a new version later this week -- but if you choose to use it, don't worry, the interface will be the same -- it just fixes some (minor) kinks.
     
    SEOEgghead, Jul 5, 2006 IP
  7. wibr

    wibr Peon

    Messages:
    206
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    Dude. Go to any SE. Type anything with the word "cloaking" or "cloaker" in it. Ignore the Harry Potter and Star Trek sites. The rest will be about cloaking web pages.

    And a word of caution. Don't go crazy with it. Stay under the radar, don't be greedy, and try to stick to 100% relevant cloaking. Once you cloak the gloves are off. So if you get caught, and banned, suck it up and move on.
     
    wibr, Jul 5, 2006 IP
  8. Mr.Rock

    Mr.Rock Peon

    Messages:
    239
    Likes Received:
    9
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    well many ppl have different ideas... some says its GOOD, some says its BAD... its better to keep it away :D bcz if u get caught.. understand plz :p
     
    Mr.Rock, Jul 11, 2006 IP
  9. wheel

    wheel Peon

    Messages:
    477
    Likes Received:
    19
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    wheel, Jul 12, 2006 IP
  10. gracecore

    gracecore Peon

    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    Is the script at http://www.seoegghead.com/blog/seo/simple-cloak-php-library-p34.html

    the new one with the minor fixes done? can we get it just from the page or is there another update ?

    cheers

    Gracecore
     
    gracecore, Nov 8, 2006 IP
  11. disgust

    disgust Guest

    Messages:
    2,417
    Likes Received:
    133
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    there are plenty of legitimate reasons to cloak. cloaking won't get you banned, cloaking and trying to decieve the search engines will; there's a bit of a difference.
     
    disgust, Nov 8, 2006 IP