What about hydrogen fuel generated by solar panels, so that if someone shoots devastator and he blows up, he can take his enemy with him? Oooh. Or maybe it would give him a hydrogen flame thrower attack!
Getting to it, my little friend. I assure you, if you want a considered reply, and not something shot from the hip, I will read and give it thought, as best as I am able. I posted the articles on the Canadian ice shelf and wildfires/warming as I came across them - incidentally - as I was reading the updated news on Hussein. Now, you may not like to recall, but I will remind you that I did read the very first source you went to, and went to the scientist and his work your source cites - and found you, and your article, got it wrong. I'll refresh: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=1998653&postcount=18 Now, this question of fact was posed to you 2 days ago - yet you run for cover, and want an immediate response on your own agenda? To everyone else - you may wish to ask Gtech, for example; we disagree on a good many things, but I believe you will hear that I am honorable in my search. I do wish to untangle the truth in this, and it will take some time - again, folks on both sides of "the aisle" a helluva lot brighter than myself have posed their theories - so I wish to really learn.
I think you were quoting some of the things that were refuted. "Each regime has seen 50% more cyclones and hurricanes..." that's ridiculous both from a fraction of a degree C increase in the current cycle we are in and also from mathematic growth: let see if A sub t equals A sub 0 times e raised to k times t where t is the number of time units and we solve for k ......hmmm there should be enough hurricanes to take out every trailer park from Pico Rivera to Glen Ellyn. Well as in our previous discussion I was in the thread before you, now I am leaving. PM me when you finally have an answer to my simple question: ************************************************************************************ You will agree that there are arguments against global warming, which ones are the best? ************************************************************************************
The effects of Global Warming are happening, but I read somewhere that the majority of the evidence, or the scale of the effects to be more precise, are unbalanced and exaggerated.
No one I know is saying GW does not exist. No one I know is saying that the affects of GW are not present What many are saying is that man kind has no positive or negative affect on GW.
yeah, many that are being paid by energy companies even George Bush says global warming is at least partially caused by people I didn't actually read the thread but a Global warming thread is not complete without one person saying A) it was unseasonalby cold for a couple days somewhere so therefore global warming is a myth B) some scientist at some point got something wrong, so don't every beleive a scientist are those points covered yet?
Dammnit, how'd you know? They are paying me in krugerrand now. No need to state the obvious. C) it snowed in Denver.... like oh my God... Where all gonna die!!!
Ferret's lacking of reading skills is well documented. Him not reading the thread really serves everyone's best interests
Wether it's caused by humans our only by nature, the global warming exist. Hence, we as long as both the North Pole and the South Pole is covered in ice, we're still in an ice age. As you can see in this SST anomalies map, the Atlantic ocean is clearly warmer than usually this time.
yeah and your lack of basic understanding of science is well documented why don't you show how you don't comprehend the idea of different states of matter and post links to how some pollution (solid particles) actually cause cooling, and then say "see how can pollution cause warming and cooling?" or what was that other gem you said one time something like , there is no record of neaderthal man?
Are you referring to Science Fiction? You want us to all post more Alex Jones links? We can do that Well, Lorien is wrong there... Your post pretty much proves it
Feel free to find my post that says this. You've said I said this a few times, but can't seem to find it Or you could type in english so I could understand what you are trying to communicate to the world. But I'm sure you didn't actually read anything I posted, so its okay. *pats you on the head* such a good little puppy.
Regardless of whether we're all going to be killed by manbearpig in 10 years or not, what type of car I drive and what type of energy individual citizens and businesses choose to use is none of the governments business. As exampled by Josh Inno, people are capable of being "environmentally responsible" if they choose to and the use of force to initiate such "responsibility" regardless of whether or not it is in my best interested, is morally wrong.
Cool map, but it's only a snapshot of one day. I see the Atlantic being much cooler in the south, the Pacific looks to be overall, cooler and New Zealand looks like it will ice over and it's summer time there! If you look at the scale you will see overall there is alot more blue (cool) than green (warm). Now I know why my furnace started kicking on early this year in California, the Pacific is cooling.