George W. Bush Washington today Wednesday, Dec 20, 2006

We are going to beef up the army and the marines in Iraq
2006 difficult year for our troops
We will change our strategies to meet our requirements on the ground
7,000,000 new jobs in USA since August 2003
We must keep our economy growing
2.10USD minimum salary increase per hour
I would not send our troops there if I did not think we can win
We are going to succeed in Iraq
The enemy cannot intimidate the United States
I have not made up my mind on more troops yet
We will ask more of Iraqi partners
Need to help Iraqis step-up
We will help young democracies in Iraq Palestine Lebanon
Victory in Iraq is achievable
The right decision to stay engaged in Iraq
Unemployment running at 4.7% in USA
Nuclear power is essential source for energy
Must invest in clean coal technology
Iran is willing to become isolated
Important to analyze what went wrong

Broadcast still in progess

Comments please :-

 

What went wrong? Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld

 

For an unbiased comment on those dudes please ask a neocon for comments

My comments would not be favorable towards these guys

Although now I am here a brief comment maybe

Bush -------------------------------that represents a blank space ------------same as his head empty

Cheney is he not the quail shooter

Rumsfeld ...........well this guy is super intelligent and smart....but what was he thinking when he joined up with these guys over 5 years ago.........he lost it too over the last 5 years..........now he has gone.........we think

 

Pathetic, as usual....

 

You guys and your Bush fetish.

 

Yep, some *only* care about what went wrong, so they can find something to blame. They care about nothing else. As always evident in their posts.

Bush Derangement Syndrome.

On the contrary, great news for real Americans!

 

What went wrong: Clinton and Gore.
Bush is having to clean up the mess.

 

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow." -- Bill Clinton in 1998

"Iraq does pose a serious threat to the stability of the Persian Gulf and we should organize an international coalition to eliminate his access to weapons of mass destruction. Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to completely deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al Gore, 2002

Now that we've done what they wanted all along, you're welcome, Bill and Al

 

Liberals, MoonBats and otherwise crazy complainers do nothing to aid in a solution; all they do is bitch. Being part of the problem seems to be the mantra of the day.

 

I think thats everything.

 

This one is from 12 months ago but is still very very true:

 

OK. Let's concentrate on what did go right. What was it? NOTHING.

 

Exactly, nothing. Instead of Mia, and GTech insulting I would like to see a point made to show some intelligence.

I assume that's asking to much

 

From whose perspective? A valid question. You don't support America, you don't support our troops and you don't support Iraqis. There's no question there, that's fact.

(Let's) means "let us." I'm not part of your "us." You support the side I'm against. So, are you saying your buds didn't get anything right, or are you defending them and saying that America didn't get anything right?

"We" don't support the same side there, gworld

 

You are not important enough to make demands. Move along and let the big boys play. Cheerleading practice doesn't start until 4pm.

 

I accept the fact that you are true to your leader actions and a great cheer leader as he was in the university but what does that prove? No matter how how much you cheer, the game plan has failed and the game is lost.

 

GTech, I'm surprised no one has called you a Nazi yet, after all, when a liberal looses an argument repeatedly, they either :

A) reference vietnam and try to compare Iraq with it
B) call all conservatives nazis and compare them to hitler...

 

I accept the fact you have defended terrorists in the past and never have a bad word for them.

But that doesn't dismiss the question I presented. Was it too tough, or are you just embarrassed? A real man would stand up for what he believes in

 

So true! Actually, gworld used both the kkk card and the racism card earlier today as his shields. Nazi's and Vietnam are also favorites of his.

Merry Christmas, d16man! Always enjoy your posts

 

Hey dudes its not that I am anti Bush et al period, and of course I want to see victory in Iraq but it is going to take a lot more politically than Bush has to offer.

Bush just can't cut it period it is not a case of Bush fetish, the guy has not got what it takes to prevail in Iraq or anywhere else for that matter.

As AGS has so very aptly and skillfully outlined in his post here
Bush is visited by the ghost of unwinnable wars
I am sure that AGS would not have posted here if for example the quote was
America is visited by the ghost of unwinnable wars

Mistake after mistake is haunting this jerk

Of course not AGS articulates so well that he was sure that when he chose the caption it referred to Bush personally. Bush (& Blair) are the core problem and are collectively and individually responsible for the debacle in Iraq

Merry Xmas GTech, AGS, D16man, gworld, Scheme, darksat, Mia, Rick_Michael, codythebest, earlpearl your posts are always entertaining looking forward to more of the same in 2007