Generic Keywords and Local Keywords

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by Sarabi, Jan 27, 2009.

  1. #1
    Hello,

    I was wondering if I'm shooting for a generic keyword like "bus" and get on the top of google for it, then if somebody puts in types in google a state name and then "bus" would I still be on the top of google for that keyword?
     
    Sarabi, Jan 27, 2009 IP
  2. Sunlust

    Sunlust Active Member

    Messages:
    448
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #2
    Sunlust, Jan 27, 2009 IP
  3. vansterdam

    vansterdam Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,145
    Likes Received:
    120
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    245
    #3
    What Sunlust said is basically right. On the other hand, if you manage to get good rankings for a generic keyword like 'bus', it would be quite easy to then target 'x bus'. Your domain would already have a strong link profile and would likely only need a few links with 'x bus' as the anchor text to rank well for it.
     
    vansterdam, Jan 27, 2009 IP
  4. tshirtdeal

    tshirtdeal Peon

    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    True, if you can score for the broad term then any "long tails" you add will get to the top of rankings with little work, mostly just solid on-page optimization..

    From my experience if you score for "Bus" you can easily score for "nyc bus" "bus trips" "bus travel" and so on...
     
    tshirtdeal, Jan 27, 2009 IP
  5. earlpearl

    earlpearl Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,584
    Likes Received:
    150
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    155
    #5
    I've done exactly that. The above responses are right on target; the website w/ the more specific targeting for something like NYC bus would outrank the website for bus.....for searches for NYC bus.

    The other comments are spot on also. Rank high for bus....and getting high rankings for NYC bus will be dramatically easier.
     
    earlpearl, Jan 27, 2009 IP