The only negative research has to do with harrasment. As I said 3 pages ago, thats not a legitamite reason to be against gay parents. It is an issue but it reflects more on society and education then it does on the abilities of two same sex parents to raise their children. The best pieces of research out of my original quote: And the kicker: Two of the biggest issues facing society and juveniles...Aggression in young men and self esteem in young women
I'm guessing one of the drawbacks which hasn't been mentioned is that males rasised by lesbians probably wouldn't be as interested in hot girl on girl action. Anyone come across any studies like that?
Lol....You have hetero parents. Has that put you off of hot man-woman action? Wait, don't answer that
No, but my dad loved Velvetta cheese so I have never been aroused with women and cheese sauce. He ruined it for me.
I hate to break this to you as it may shatter your self esteem and belief in the world but when your father told you he put Velveeta Cheese all over your mother it was a metaphor
Gross. I never said he put it all over you I just said he liked it. He ate it with his mouth open. Thanks a lot. You've broke something inside me now I'm sure.
OK, new rule - No More Metaphors! Im trying to have my dinner Back to the topic at hand - It seems no-one has a retort to the evidence supplied.
Is those sexual organs could mix together to make a child which they can not I would have no problem with them having children. They chose to or if you believe were born to be unable to have children by being gay, that is why I will not support gay parents just to be parents. In an emergency type situation where there is no straight parents at all willing to take the child I'd be willing to support that. Being gay though in any logical thought process takes away the ability to have children = IMO them not being able to have children just to have children and a family. If gay couples want to be foster parents to help neglected or abused children I do not so much have a problem with that, I do have a problem with them thinking they somehow have a right to have children when it's #1 not a right, #2 they chose to be that way.
Just curious hrbl but how old were you when you decided to be straight? Did you have mull it over much? I mean like what where the major factors in your decision? Did you weight the pros and cons? and then decide?
Please read my entire post, I just knew someone was going to take that out of context. Chose to be or born to be does not matter to me on my opinion. In the end that's what they are, in the end they logically can not have children can they by themselves with their gay partner?
I don't really understand your post though There are lots of people who are born not able to have children, do you view them the same way? I just don't understand, your post. Do you think homos should be able to adopt or not?