G+ better than FB Like for SEO ?

fb gud for seo

 

Of course Google plus is better than FB for SEO.

 

agree

 

Google+ are way better as UI, but facebook has a bigger market share

 

I have mentioned in my previous post that I have tested 2 blog posts for same test.In my view the findings are Google plus contribute better juice for rank than Facebook likes.
I got like 1600 FB likes on one and Gplus 200 on one. Gplus ranks better for same keyword difficulty level. Both the stuff written by same writer.No SEO for either of these two posts.

 

both networks are good but for professional use google plus have better influence and have real visitors for business.

 

Prathvee surely I agree with your first point that Google plus is good suited for professionals but Facebook is one big source after organic traffic to drive traffic on your site.

 

Yeah Google + is better than Facebook for SEO purpose....

 

Google+ is much better because it provides dofollow backlinks if you share anything on Google+ .

 

both are good, but you should put more effort into g+ as it is becoming more and more important in SEO.

 

google have G+ so it's can be

 

Both are good SEO tools but i would prefer Google+ for Facebook since its SEO friendly

 

G+ helps you get more business than FB..how?
1. If you post anything in G+, it will immediately get indexed by Google. Don't you want this?
2. The link appears in G+ is a "Dofollow" whereas FB keeps the "Nofollow" attribute for the links.
3. If someone +1d or re-share your post, the chances of getting traffic to that page gets increased.
4. G+ interface is more user friendly compare to FB which is somewhat outdated now.
5. You can control the tabs in G+ profile.
6. No authorization is required to add any friend in G+. Though its less personal but for those who wants to grow their business and wants loads of traffic can get the benefit of this feature.
7. Easy to share text update, photos, links or videos.

But if we consider privacy of your account, FB is far better than G+. But as i said, if you are interested in growing your brand name or traffic to your website, go for G+. G+ is really very useful if and only if you don't spam it.

Hope this helps.

 

By SEO point of view G+ is best over facebook likes. You can get traffic from facebook page but G+ gives you traffic from search engines.

 

Google+ is more friendly.

 

I agree with her. But, both are helpful for SEO.

 

I think you'll find this article useful:

Google’s Matt Cutts: Once Again, +1s Have No Direct Impact On Rankings

 

sure g+ is more better than fb ,g= is like pintrest google search engine love it much also you must have good circles and high content to give the people sharing and talk about your article or product ................have a nice day

 

1. It is owned by Google – While I am not suggesting that Google has a preference to G+ over other social networks because it owns it, the reason that it may play a more important role is because Google has all the data it needs about G+ profiles and pages – something not happening with the data on Facebook and Twitter.
2. Google Authorship – I have mentioned many times in my posts the importance of Google Authorship as a ranking factor and that fact that to implement authorship you need a G+ profile automatically raises the importance of Google+ for SEO.
3. Good for Local SEO – In order to establish your Google+ for Business profile and get better positioning in local SEO you need to have a G+ business page.

 

I would have to say google+ over Facebook for SEO because it would be quicker to rank higher on Google with Google+. Plus I have witnessed a few times myself with a post a shared on google+ compared to Facebook and the google+ shared landed quicker on google than my Facebook share, so I would have to say Google+. But this is only my opinion and what I have seen from my personal results.