future pr - data centre question

Discussion in 'Products & Tools' started by Notting, Jan 22, 2006.

  1. #1
    Notting, Jan 22, 2006 IP
  2. Caydel

    Caydel Peon

    Messages:
    835
    Likes Received:
    47
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    It can't be too reliable. For instance, it showed my site (in sig) as gett PR of -1 on about 50% of the data centers, and PR of 5 on the other 50%

    It would be nice, I am taking it with a grain of salt. Somehow I can't see it happening for me. And I suspect that noone can be accurate in this, because noone is quite sure how PR is calculated.

    Brian
     
    Caydel, Jan 22, 2006 IP
  3. mystikmedia

    mystikmedia Jedi Master

    Messages:
    5,564
    Likes Received:
    498
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    270
    #3
    mystikmedia, Jan 22, 2006 IP
  4. Smyrl

    Smyrl Tomato Republic Staff

    Messages:
    13,740
    Likes Received:
    1,702
    Best Answers:
    78
    Trophy Points:
    510
    #4
    I believe those pagerank predictors about like I believe in the tooth fairy.

    Seriously, I think the best thing to do is sit back and relax. Pagerank update will probably come within next month.

    Shannon
     
    Smyrl, Jan 22, 2006 IP
  5. Caydel

    Caydel Peon

    Messages:
    835
    Likes Received:
    47
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    Caydel, Jan 22, 2006 IP
  6. GetWebHost

    GetWebHost Active Member

    Messages:
    735
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    78
    #6
    Mine is dropping - http://www.futurerank.com/futureprcheck.php?url=www.triphp.com

    Hope that it's not true!
     
    GetWebHost, Jan 22, 2006 IP
  7. SportsOutlaw

    SportsOutlaw Active Member

    Messages:
    952
    Likes Received:
    37
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    70
    #7
    mine is showin "current pageranks of 7 and 8 with futures of 9 and 10. Glad to see that google finally recognizes all my hard work. ;)
     
    SportsOutlaw, Jan 22, 2006 IP
  8. texisman

    texisman Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    305
    Likes Received:
    17
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    158
    #8
    I don't really think those PR prediction tools work all that well. The only way we will know is to wait for the Google update. They are showing increased PR for my sites, can't wait to find out.
     
    texisman, Jan 22, 2006 IP
  9. SportsOutlaw

    SportsOutlaw Active Member

    Messages:
    952
    Likes Received:
    37
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    70
    #9
    I can't wait either. I have never been to concerned about previous PR udates, but I have done alot to my site over the past few months, much of it SEO related. As a result, thousands of my pages have had URL changes so they have been sitting at PR 0 for a couple months now.

    I have to admit, I am constantly checking mcdar, the seochage future pagerank tool, and constantly checking this forum for any word of an update.
     
    SportsOutlaw, Jan 22, 2006 IP
  10. Notting

    Notting Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,210
    Likes Received:
    335
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    280
    #10
    having looked at a few more of these future pr tools the results are rather ambiguous. However a lot of the toold said my pr would go up, for my competitors they all said they wold stay the same. This can only be a good sign in my eyes! Compare your future pr with you competitors too get a better idea of what might happen!!
     
    Notting, Jan 23, 2006 IP
  11. jimKeough

    jimKeough Peon

    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    i agree. i don't think you should take these future pr tools seriously, but they can give you an idea if your moving up or down.
     
    jimKeough, Feb 5, 2006 IP
  12. marketing

    marketing Active Member

    Messages:
    967
    Likes Received:
    31
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #12

    You put in http:// before your domain name didn't you.

    See the site clearly says to use type it in with or without the www, but I guess I should make it more clear and state no http before it.

    If you try it without the http, you will find it to be very accurate. Try yours again without the http in front of it. Please report back, I am intersted to find out if that makes you feel like it is a decent tool. :D
     
    marketing, Feb 7, 2006 IP
  13. marketing

    marketing Active Member

    Messages:
    967
    Likes Received:
    31
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #13

    You too...please try your domain without typing in the http:// in front of the domain name and extension. Try it with the www. and without the www. but leave out typing http:// in the box. I know you will find that the tool is more accurate than you might first give it credit. It has been very accurate for me, that is why I put the tool up on the net to begin with, cause I use it a lot.

    Please let me know what you think. I am open to making some changes if you feel it will help make it more accurate for you.
     
    marketing, Feb 7, 2006 IP
  14. mystikmedia

    mystikmedia Jedi Master

    Messages:
    5,564
    Likes Received:
    498
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    270
    #14
    Yea, I figured that out later. I don't think it is correct, though. I would be very surprised if blazemp.com does not become PR8 with the update...
     
    mystikmedia, Feb 7, 2006 IP
  15. mystikmedia

    mystikmedia Jedi Master

    Messages:
    5,564
    Likes Received:
    498
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    270
    #15
    I think it is good, though. The results seem to be about what I would expect for the others. :)
     
    mystikmedia, Feb 7, 2006 IP
  16. marketing

    marketing Active Member

    Messages:
    967
    Likes Received:
    31
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #16
    I put a http:// in front of the box that you enter your domain name in. Hopefully that will help other to know not to type that part.

    :)
     
    marketing, Feb 7, 2006 IP