Future Page Rank sites vs. the real thing.

And that's what this thread is for. To find out how correct or 'fake' they are...if Google ever updates! I hope the PR 7 perdictions are correct.

 

Then to forgo argument I wish all luck.

 

http://www.futurepagerank.net/futureprcheck.php?url=www.bloglinksformoney.com
0 -> 3
By no means unreasonable.

 

I dont think so that future page rank tool shows the corredt page rank of the web site, which it achieve in future time because it gives you some of idea about PR, but not exactly, PR is not dependent of particular any one factor but it's all about linking strategy that you implment ...

 

I dont think, that the future page rank tool can predict the correct PR of the web-site, that it will get in future-time because PR is not dependent on only one particular factor but its mixture of strategies which mainly includes the linking strategy for the site .....

 

I don't know , the iwebtool moves around a lot from one prediction or another...

Both my sites, the hoax one and the webmaster one were started only 6 and 10 weeks before the google pr update in october... within not much time they were being predicted pr5 and both were pr5 after the update, the older of the 2 had many internal pr5 pages as well. Now my new site is being forcasted to be a pr5 and it hasn't been a month since it was up.

Perhaps the percentage of back links counts as well, since I hardly have any compared to some reports I here at dp but my sites are small as well.

Lisa

 

Does anyone actually know what the figures mean? I mean the three sets of figures, such as 1:1:3 ??

 

The higher the third number, the better. Compair the numbers in the very first post.

The site that gets a PR 7 guess, has much higher numbers than the one with a PR 4 guess.

 

i am very confused !!

When i type only mysite.com , it gives me PR 6 and when i do [B]www[/B].mysite.com , it gives PR 2 !!!

anyone can tell me why plz ??

 

Because the majority of your IBLs point to the mysite.com version, and not to the www.mysite.com version

 

http://www.futurepagerank.net/futureprcheck.php?url=www.gsmjoy.com
PR 0 to PR 4

 

I would like to know if this is a disadvantage . thx

 

Not really. But once you start you link building campaign, you SHOULD concentrate only on the www or on the domain.com version.

Not both. Because if you link to both, you split the PR amongst them, which is a disadvantage.

So be carefull when exchanging links, so that people write them correctly

 

Check this out:

Try leaving off = rank from the url.

Can anyone make heads or tails of the resulting data?

 

urlwww.n-i-n-t-e-n-d-o.com

isn't a domain, so of course it'll give messed up results and an error!!!

 

we'll never know how accurate they are until the PR update comes along...
if ever....
but at least the information is coming from google and isn't a guess as older tools were.

 

pr6 for http://hyipbest.com
pr5 for http://autosurfbest.com

..

 

http://www.futurepagerank.net/futureprcheck.php?url=roberdo.com pr0 to 5
Rank_1:1:3 Rank_1:1:3 Rank_1:1:3 Rank_1:1:2 Rank_1:1:2 Rank_1:1:2 Rank_1:1:2 Rank_1:1:2 Rank_1:1:2 Rank_1:1:5 Rank_1:1:1 Rank_1:1:2 Rank_1:1:4 Rank_1:1:4 Rank_1:1:3

 

Rechecked today - Futurepagerank.net results
Kaediem.com 5 to a 3 or 4
surfinglegendsandhoaxes.com 5 to 5
myrollercoasterkid.com 0 to 4

iwebtool shows each site getting (staying at) pr5

Lisa

 

Interesting:

http://livepr.raketforskning.com/how-live-pagerank-is-calculated.html