Funny trademark restriction term

Discussion in 'Google AdWords' started by JugglerX, Sep 18, 2007.

  1. #1
    I was surprised one of my ads was not approved because of a trademark infringement the other day.

    Due to trademark reasons, we do not allow advertisers to use 'Jungle' in their Google Adwords ads.

    This is pretty funny but at the same time it's pretty damn scary.

    how can you trademark jungle? Maybe it's related to amazon?

    Anyone else care to share a bizarre trademark term they have found?
     
    JugglerX, Sep 18, 2007 IP
  2. alhermette

    alhermette Peon

    Messages:
    74
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    I seem to remember buying some computer supplies off a UK company Jungle.com once maybe it has something to do with that. I experienced the same problem with the word "Tiger", I assume the beer.

    Adwords editor told me it was trademarked in the UK and my ads would not run (no problems in the US or Canada though). There is a system to request usage of a trademarked term and as my use of the word tiger was to do with the animal and not a commercial product of any sort I thought it would be worth a go. Adwords editor came up with some instructions on how to do this which I totally failed to understand or complete properly but my ads started running immediately when I re-posted so I didn't investigate any further.
     
    alhermette, Sep 18, 2007 IP
  3. cianuro

    cianuro Peon

    Messages:
    1,857
    Likes Received:
    106
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    cianuro, Sep 18, 2007 IP
  4. PPC-Coach

    PPC-Coach Active Member

    Messages:
    1,450
    Likes Received:
    23
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #4
    I got denied for using the word "coach".

    I couldn't believe I had to request a friggen exception.
     
    PPC-Coach, Sep 18, 2007 IP
  5. Johu

    Johu Peon

    Messages:
    583
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    They shouldn't be automatically blocking any keywords where the trademark is marked as 2(f), meaning that it has possible generic usage.

    At least they refuse to do that for some trademarks I've worked with (on the trademark owner's site)
     
    Johu, Sep 18, 2007 IP