Sharing a free online tool to build quick supplemental backlinks to diversify your overall backlink portfolio to ensure you have varied anchor text and class-c links. You'll want to have other links built to your site and not rely solely on these. It's great for getting a boost to your backlinks and secondary sites, or optionally to complement your links to your money site. Step 1: Add your URL to Backlink Builder and hit submit Step 2: Keep your tab open as it builds backlinks and pings them Step 3 (optional): Once completed, copy all backlinks and ping them. Step 4 (optional): Take your backlinks and post them on your blog or dripfeed for added effectiveness! Put your best SEO foot forward and generate a large number of backlinks in a matter of seconds! Enjoy!
Won't this just fast track your site into google penalties? or are you suggesting this as negative seo?
No this won't get you penalized - what you're doing is having links built on stat/nameserver checking sites, many of which get built and listed in Google organically. With this tool you're basically creating additional links (some are nofollow) to your site and because they are on different Class C IP addresses and have different anchor text (e.g., "Click here", "Visit site", etc.) it helps to show diversity in where you're getting links. This can be really helpful in getting backlinks to your 2nd tier sites or to complement any other backlinks you have to dilute the effects of building backlinks with the same anchor text (e.g., if you keep using the same anchor text when you get links to your site, you have a strong chance Google will recognize unnatural link building).
To be honest, this is very risky in my opinion. Thank you anyway, maybe i will try with some of my test domains.
As per matthew woodwards experiment, Pinging links is fucking stupid. http://www.matthewwoodward.co.uk/experiments/index-backlinks-easily-revealing-case-study-results/
Just a quick note to Helge... you are one of about 5 people around here who knows what the fuck they are talking about and its a pleasure to read your stuff. N.
Strange... I never heard of any of these "indexing services" mentioned in the article. This post reads more like a promotion for OneHourIndexing...? I personally use BacklinkIndexer.com, and in my experience it's percentage of indexed links is much higher than specified in the post. As for pinging, agree it is no longer effective.
Ignore the promotion of the other services, its obviously affiliate promotions, but the data he presents is always true and legit.
If backlink needs pinging, it is not worth to call it "backlink". I think this is enough to explain my opinion.
Agreed -- It trips my scammy sense; but then trying to automate and spam links should trip anyone's scammy sense -- well, apart from the people who will use every dirty trick in the book to polish a turd in trying and promote sites that have no content of value -- which describes 90%+ of the type of sites that pull these types of stupid tricks. Black hat SEO -- nope. This is outright hoodoo-voodoo. SEO witchcraft, which much like other new-age pseudo-science quackery leaves you asking "Is there any amount of BS people won't swallow?"
... and the best way to build value is? Have content of value so people WANT to organically link to it... that's the problem with most of the "SEO as a industry unto itself" garbage is the vast majority of it is dumping a can of shellac on a pile; no matter how much you polish it the result is still bug **** on horse ****.
Exactly! I have often thought the same thing myself, "SEO" nowadays is pretty much "How much spam do i have to do to get my shitty article to page 1?", Instead of the more appropriate "How should i write this article so people can find it and be helpful for my reader". The whole backlinking, spinning and to a degree "internet marketing" ... i guess you could call it an industry, is nothing more than a glorified spambot. at least in my opinion..
The moment you have people and even companies who ALL they do is SEO, or worse even tighter specialization on things like automated backlinks, keyword research, and so forth -- it qualifies as a industry unto itself; more so when quite literally it's ALL they specialize in. That's a LOT of the problem with SEO as a industry, is the majority of people game their results look good to clients who know nothing, when in fact the vast majority of it is just smoke and mirrors. It's all a bunch of lies using statistics even most of the people doing SEO don't actually understand to card-stack a pretty much fictional result. SEO is a small but important part of building a site; it does NOT warrant someone who's only job is SEO; Tou can tell the ENTIRE thing is a giant scam filled to the brim with buckets of bunko when most every SEO "expert" doesn't know enough about professional writing, the topic they are supposedly trying to optimize for, logical document structure, HTML, CSS or accessibility minimums to be flapping their gums about what a website should be doing. Particularly on "backlinks as a service" as the exemplar in this thread. Backlinks from sites not relevant to your topic are worth what exactly? You get caught, you ARE getting slapped down by the search engines sooner than later; see all the jokers who were running around like chickens with their heads cut off after the big G updated "top heavy" -- or before that in October with the changes to Penguin. (which every last SEOtard screams and moans when Penguin or Panda is updated).
Pretty much what SEO is is making the URL and content a bit search friendlier, you mention your keywords a few times, but you write your content for the reader, the reader then likes your content, and pots a link to it on his/her blog, telling their readers that this article was good or whatever, or they share the article on facebook, this way your shit gains "quality points" in googles eyes. What i see the current SEO industry as is, "lets make goolge think our spun shit article is important and high quality by spamming all these wordpress blogs". I like good content, I hate SEO
Which is basically what Matt Cutts has been telling us for a decade; develop your site for the user, not the search engine. The head of Google's anti-spam team might actually know what he's talking about.
With all respects... but why ? If you have built several links and those links were not indexed... what kind of those backlinks are ?