Did I use the illuminati in the wrong context? I'll have to bow to your alex jones controlled mind on that one.
Oh, so we judge coverage by percentage of newspaper used now. 1% is still coverage, yes? I canot find how difficult it is for you to grasp that it was covered and the story merited little coverage except for sheeple who need to be scared. Yes, the arrests happened and you will hear nothing more about it like the Ft. dix and Miami 'busts'. You will not hear anymore of it because it was a non event. Man, cut the crap about the lib stuff. Is it so hard for you to believe anyone can actually think for themselves? I am neither a republican nor a democrat I choose, instead, to be an American first and vote for who I think is, here is a new one for you, competent for the job . If TP is wrong so is BillO, period. Split hairs all you want, but 1% on the front page and the full story inside is coverage, sheesh. The reality is no matter what the NYT did you and BillO will hae a problem with it. You have yet to disprove anything I have wrote and offered zero facts. Again, you decide to split hairs and act like you are right. BillO, like Bush, has an issue with the truth and people who think differently from them. You, on your blog, disbelieve global warming and BillO admits it exists, is he wrong or are you right?...talk about a pickle for you now...
What did the NYT say about it? One would think their feedback would be important, considering they are the offender.
I do not know and do not care. Whatever they said does not change the fact that the story was listed on the front page with the details on the inside . Considering the story was a non-story the coverage was adequate to begin with. Again, was there a headline on the front page with text? Yes. Did they write about inside the paper? Yes, therefore that is coverage. This was not a lead story. I am also willing to bet the NY Post ran some scary headline like "Terror Plot in NYC" on the front page and the story was on page 3 or 4, did they give front page coverage then? Given your position the answer would be no. BillO just likes to tell people what to think and other folks have no problem with that, not sure why, but they must like being told what they feel . The only thing BillO is looking out for is how to fleece people out of money in order to buy his crap on his website, i.e. coffee mugs, pens and his coveted premium membership LOL. Oh, he will gladly give people a 1% discount on products if they sign up for the premium membership, how generous. Better yet, remember when he said buy my book and I will send on to our troops in Iraq? Like they are going to care what BillO is going to say. Is it me or have you noticed BillO is going off the deepend here as well. I have seen him absolutely blow his top on a few recent occasions, thought the guy was going to have a heart attack. Then he cranked out with the whole white male christian power structure statement. At least he admits he's a racist though . The last person I need looking out for me is BillO, I think I do a good enough job of watching out for myself. But, he is entertaining and very funny....I use his boycott list as a preferred places to buy products from. I did and still do buy French wine, it is the best. Thank God he called off the Boycott....the French were hurting .