Glad someone else wants to point out the topic to Lorien LOL Careful, he's not a fan of facts I've read his arguments before he'd prefer the FOX version.
Oh, so now I am dumb? A lie is intentionally misleading a person or persons in order to make a point or for other malicious reasons. The truth is telling people what actually occurred and why. Billo told a lie, it was mentioned on the front page and covered on page 37, that is a fact, not a BillO fact a real fact. The story was mentioned and covered, duh. I do not care what think progess said, the point is BillO told a very big half truth, period. As I previously stated it was a non story. So, if the headline read terrorist attack avoided, but the story was on page 4 then the story is still mentioned or is it covered? I grasp the point of this thread just fine, the story was mentioned on the front page and covered where it belonged on page 37. The title of the thread is Fox Lied and to a certain degree the title is correct.
It is not difficult. Really, it's not. BO said that the story was not covered on page 1 TP said it was covered on page 1 NYT said the story was not covered on page 1 Who is lying again? Really. It's not a tough question. NYT -surely- knows where they wrote their own story, don't they? A mention, a blurb, a paragraph, etc is -not- coverage. Is it? I know you are desperately trying to shill for TP, but drop the silly defense here.
LOL, whatever you are splitting hairs. Like I said I do not care what TP said, do not read do not care you are the one who keeps mentioning it. I am referring to strictly BillO. BillO made a point of the NYT making no metion of it on the front page, but they did there fore he told a half truth, really. Shill for TP?? Never been there until I read the story. Do not read it never have do not care about the site. I am responding to the thread and to only what BillO said. I know you want to paint me as a liberal or whatever, but that is not the case. Like any informed person I am liberal on some issues and conservative on other issues. I also sure as heck do not need BillO to tell me how to feel, where to shop or how to think on any issue.
Yes, sadly, I am only considering the topic of the thread. If you wish to deflect into a general "fox news sucks" or "bill oreilly sucks" topic; that's fine. but please accept the reality that its not fox news lying here, but think progress. This is when you watch the video. The says the NYT did not cover the story on page 1. Again; please stop. You are looking very silly here. Not only do say that you do not care what TP says, but then you go on to support what they say exactly and fail to realize they are wrong. Please make up your mind.
I am not left at all. What facts are you referring to that BillO wants you to believe everything he says is true? If I am 'left' LOLOLOL then BillO is far right. I do not care what TP says, but I am not afraid to call out people when they are wrong. I look silly? You have not responded to anything I have said other than deciding to split hairs about coverage and mentioned, besides calling people names as well. You seem to care about TP more than I all I am doing is agreeing with one point of the only article I ever read from them and that is the story was mentioned on the first page and covered later inthe paper. BillO and you fail to realize that simple fact. So, did BillO even mention the 'blurb' on the front page? Insulting me or trying to bully me will not change the fact of the matter. We will have to agree to disagree and I got better things to do than to split hairs with you. Good night this was fun
Irrelevant. Instructing someone to turn to page 37 for a recipe doesn't mean the recipe is covered on page 1. Get it? Let's assume we are talking about abu ghraib. If the NYT did the same thing..would you be arguing that the story was covered on page 1? Of course not. The blurb would be irrelevant. just as it is now. If you feel insulted or bullied; I'd stop supporting positions that make you feel that way
Irrelevant? So, a headline on page one with the story on page 4 is not coverig the story? Apples to bannas comparison. Abu Ghraib actually happened and was somewhat news worthy. This did not happen they had no real plans or materials and all authoritative sources admitted their idea was a joke and would never work. LOL! I am sorry but a correct position is one I will not back down from. You did not actually hurt my feelings, as my wife says I am emotionally stunted. The point is you right wing folks just like to hurl bombs, insults and try to bully people to believe in your position. How I miss the old days of actual debate without name calling. BTW, I still never said FNC or BillO suck. I actually listen to them a lot, everyone needs a good laugh now and again. I just have no problem calling him out when he is wrong and he was wrong on this and many other issues. Keep it Pithy
Nope. A headline on the sidebar that takes up 1% of the front page; while a picture of a cello takes up 10% of the front page. No, that is not covering a story. I find it hard to believe its that difficult to grasp. The arrests actually happened. Did they not? We aren't talking about if it warranted front page coverage. Soros will still love you if you admit that TP is wrong here. He won't take your candy away. It's okay. Really. Facts and reality are bombs. I'll note that for the future
Yeah lol, I am am a very big non fan of O'Reilly. In my opinion he is the biggest fool in America, a very very dangerous man sprouting his BS out as facts to a very gullible audience. I love the "we're looking out for you" crap that he finishes his show off with. Oh boy, you need to vote on my excellent thread from last January lol: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?p=2049654#post2049654
thats very biased and almost deceptive way to make a point , fox new'ss reputation to people is going downhill very fast. they should cut their crap if they want to gain the trust of americans
That old chestnut again eh GTech? How many times have you used that one before lol. I do my own thinking and that is why I can see how mainstream media outlets like FOX News control sheeple like you so easily.
BO says the story wasn't covered on the front page & it wasn't. NYT says the story wasn't covered on the front page & it wasn't (They should know they printed the paper). Everyone knows the story wasn't covered on the front page & it wasn't. Some people think an headline on page one is coverage it is not. #SORTED#
As many times as you have posted news from alex jones website? Probably pretty close, at least. Have you ever noticed that people (like yourself) who let alex jones do their thinking for them always believe they are above others? They say things like: You are a sheep because you get your news from {insert anything here, but Fox is the most empowering}. We are trying to wake you people up (as if an alex jones minion is on a higher level of thinking than others and only they can see it). Sounds familiar, doesn't it?
For someone that's supposedly not left, you are sure are going to battle for one of the left's most vile websites (thinkprogress). Things that make ya go "hmmmm....."
Way more times than I have posted news from Jones' website, in fact I rarely ever post anything from his site. There are many other sites out there GTech trying to expose your corrupt hero Bush. Thankfully I am not brainwashed by the uber controlled mainstream media like you and the rest of your DP crazy gang are.
Right...you're brainwashed by old men that pimp fear like alex jones by cramming in more ads per square inch of web page than any other sites I've seen, telling you that "the man" is coming to get ya! You don't get your news from the media, but post links to media stories and your opinion of Iraq reflects the media's and you will never answer why when asked. Yes, AGS, you are truly more informed of lizards than any others here! I bet you have the illuminati on MSN messenger, eh? There are times that your delusion just cracks me up. There's other times I can't help but wonder what you be like if you got it treated.
Again more BS from you. Are you sure that you are not Bill O'Reilly? You pull a load of spin every single day. I have never ever mentioned lizards, and as I have said before that is loriens bag. He has the fixation with that, not me.