you mean "if found irrelevant." btw, quick question, how many of you were there? how many sites did you have to visit per day? what criteria did you have to use to rate a site? were you checking content quality on a subjective basis or a site's compliance with the rules? how did they select the sites you had to visit, or did you make the choice? is there a PR cutoff for the sites you visit? did you visit blogs also or only business websites? did you visit only english language sites? was design a factor? is the rating system a score of 1-10 or more complicated? did you ever rate a site as "crap" even though it was compliant? did a supervisor randomly check your ratings? did youtelecommute or work at the plex? did you get free massages and ice cream? did you stay in touch with colleages who still work as raters? why did you quit? how much did they pay you? is the rating system an integral part of google's system for maintaining the quality of the serps or a way of providing feedback to fine-tune the algorithm?
Excellent questions. I hope the answers are forthcoming. (Somehow I doubt it, someone is going to have black helicopters in their backyard tonight... haha)