Could you rephrase that in a way that everyone here can clearly understand? Are you referring to yo-yo's outrageouts insults, to your outrageous misquoting, or to Mia's outrage at being insulted? Are you referring to yourself and yo-yo as a group? Or do you have some sort of imaginary group of adversaries in your furry little head?
Willy I don't think it really that hard to understand, personal insults and attacks , although somewhat entertaining, arn't really much of discussion. Suddenly yo-yo says something that is a insult, and you start talking about banning, MIA suddenly takes is all worried about etiquette of discussion. But if someone you agree with did the same thing it wouldn't bother you at all, how many times have guys tried to personally insult gworld? Its like you guys take everything so personal, your sunk into your us vs them mentality you don't seperate people from the discussion.
LOL. Mission Impossible 3 (with that lunatic tom cruise) sold more in a SINGLE DAY than Flight 93 has in over a full week!
ferret: It was not your idea which was difficult to understand, it was your phraseology. As per usual, your argument is out of step with the facts. It was yo-yo who took this discussion to a personal level, in post #141. Even your attack in post #137 was "less personal" because you did not mention specific names of people whom you consider "homophobic."
Are you kidding? If you are scared of your kids seeing gay people , then pretty much you are homophobic. Do you disagree with that? Do you need the word defined for you? Its not personal insult, its kind of fact/opinion sort of thing. I personally think its pathetic and backwards, but there are lot of people who are proud to to homophobic, so to them it would really be an insult. Like if something thinks white people are master race, well then they sort of racist, right? To most people that an insult, but some black muslims and skinheads take a lot of pride in being racist anyways anyone seen the inside man, or thank you for smoking, I think I'm going to go see one of those tommorrow
ferret: I do not think that anyone is "scared" of gay people. Many people simply find it distasteful, such as if you were found licking your balls in public. The term "homophobic" is used only for propaganda purposes. It has an extremely limited connection with reality. Inside Man was entertaining. Thank You For Smoking looks interesting, but I have not seen it. That's one that would be easy to screw up by going too far over the top to be humorous.
Debunked, would not have said anything to a straight couple making out , but he feel within his rights to say something to the homos, he has the right to say anything to anyone in public place, but his reasoning behind it is based upon a perceived superiority of his sexual persuasion. Him being "right" and them being "wrong". And fear of his children seeing someone of another persuasion, is almost text book definition of homophobia. People who think people who are different then them are "wrong" or "distasteful", and should be treated differently, denied that same rights as other people are essentially un-American. It goes totally against the idea that the country was founded on, that all people are equal. Don’t you think? At one point a couple of a different race kissing in public would have brought the same reaction.
That's more than a bit of an assumption about debunked. When did you become an omniscient being, able to read the minds of other people?
Inside man was good, a lot better than most of the garbage hollywood puts out. My friend has seen thank you for smoking, and thought it was rather funny. I look forward to watching it soon.
Assumption. I would say something too. Has nothing to do with some perceived "rights." Some things are not for public consumption. That would be me, though you managed to butcher what I said. I do not fear gays. My kids are grown now. What I didn't want, was to have to explain to my children why two bushy dudes were making out in the mall. That's not an unreasonable position for any parent with small children. You victimize yourself and other "homos" for parents and children that are not tolerant of such moral decadence, however, the real victimization is when a six year old kid turns and asks mom and dad why two grown men (or women) are kissing in the food court (or anywhere else). Children should have the "right" to be children. It's not about thinking different, it's about conduct in public and a lack of proper home training. Has nothing to do with some "perceived" rights being denied. Invoking patriotism over two bushy dudes making out in the mall may be a first, for me. For different reasons.
What are the different reasons? Please explain. Gay people are part of life, get over it . The idea that kids knowing about gay people somehow hurts them shows you intolerance. You feel they are "wrong" and you are "right", that you are superior and they should be hidden from sight? Right? Hide them, they are diry , filthy disgusting etc right? Seeing them hurts the children? Seeing them strips away childrens right to be children?
For one thing, I don't find the street people "entertaining", it is messed up. Many of these kids were abused at home, drugged out parents and now they are paying for it. I find that the lowest of the low, children should be able to live and not go through all of the abuse. Now, I know this isn't the case for everyone of them but it is very common. Then they go and sell themselves, etc... Yes Polk street is where I went, seeing a 7' tall man dressed in girls clothes is quite intersting, I believe he is a basketball player?!?!? Santa Cruz, I lived there when I was younger - Ben Lomond, Felten, Boulder Creek, etc... Then moved back my last year of High School. I went to Soquel High and lived in Scotts Valley. Moved after I got married.
I can tolerate, but I sure don't have to accept or agree with it now do I? Reverse things, will you tolerate me and my beliefs? Obviously not, you think I need to change. You are biggoted and even Christophobic in some of the things you have said. Get over it.............
When two gay men can bear a child through Sodomy with each other, then I will except what they do as normal in the human kingdom. Until then I will shield my 2 small children from those who are depraved. And it is not just Homo's that I shield my children from, there are many other acts of depravity that children should be protected from. As far as a black man and a white woman getting married and having children, I think that is wonderful. Men and Women produce children and skin color has nothing to do with it. As a matter of fact, they produce some of the most beautiful children of our time. D
Ok so sex is to be between two people that love each other. But in the end result what does sex generally produce besides bringing two people together. So the whole point of men and woman's reproduction system is for what? Gay people can not reproduce unless they buy into adoption or other means to have children. Gay people need the opposite gender in order to have children.
If you thought it was suppose to be an action movie, you really must be clueless. That would be like watching schindlers list for the action. LOL It was suppose to reflect a real event... MI3 looks cool...