Too bad; its the democrats: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16723384/site/newsweek/ First; why is Schumer talking to his imaginary friends. Does this disturb anyone? Secondly; how did the democrats "do better" with the coveted imaginary friend constituency. Did they vote? Is this not admitting to massive voter fraud? Thirdly; why aren't Schumer's imaginary friends always voting for him? Must suck when your own imaginary friends don't even want you in office My heffalump imaginary friend didn't get a vote, dammit.
Your post is the best proof for another one of Bush's failures. Do you remember the "No child left behind" program? obviously in your case they have failed and left you behind since you can not even comprehend such a simple text.
Someone who calls someone stupid should not have both grammatical errors, spelling and poor sentence structure in the post where they call that person stupid. Just a tip for ya
I'm starting to think gworld hates all infidels. The foul he offers to the average, everyday infidel is never offered to terrorists. Nothing but kind words for them.
But but but it's Bush's fault it failed! I remember hearing some educators whining about NCLB funding after mentioning that they got a brand new laptop for every child in their school. I don't think they got the message across that they thought they were. Middle class schools that have "enough" money don't get anything. Inner city "poor" schools get all the money they could possibly need and more. But, we're supposed to think it's still not enough. Are poor kids more retarded that they need more resources than middle class students? I don't think so. But that's what happens when bleeding hearts cause blood loss to the brain.
Thats funny...over here it is commonly known that he WON the election, fair and square...it was the dems who were crying over "hanging chad" and "I didn't understand how the voting machines worked"..boohoo, I'm going to cry for the next 8 years that he is in office...boo hoo.
Haha, don't understand the machines, is that what you're saying? How about the fact that many of them didn't work, and/or were easily exploited. But you're right chum, I'm sure those things can be confusing for folks like yourself Just don't give up
No mate, what I am laughing about is the fact that you thought Bush won the election fair and square.
Hey AGS bush did win it fair and square. They didnt cheat, they were just truthfully challenged loooooooooooool
I believe there were 4 independent recounts of the Florida 2000 election, including one done by the ultra-liberal New York Times. They all (very quietly) concluded that Bush legitimately won in Florida. Gore didn't lose the election in Florida. He lost in his home state of Tennessee. He would have had enough electoral college votes if his own state had voted for him. Also, the Supreme Court did not elect Bush, as is widely believed by the left. The US Supreme Court overturned an unconstitutional rulling by the Democrat controlled Florida Supreme Court that changed a law to allow the Florida votes to tilt in Gore's favor. The Supreme Court system in the US is not allowed to make or change laws; they can only rule on the constitutionality of a law. Whether you like Bush or not, 100% of the legitimate evidence says he won.
You didn't actually read the story and notice that it was about Schumer (D-NY) did you? I thought not
Exactly...but when you rely on polls to tell you who won instead of facts, you don't get the picture. Oh and btw, sKerry lost in 2004 as well...(but not according to the polls....ooohh...another conspiracy!!!!)