Federal judge rules lone Jesus painting in Louisiana courthouse was unconstitutional

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by ziya, Apr 17, 2008.

  1. GRIM

    GRIM Prominent Member

    Messages:
    12,638
    Likes Received:
    733
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #101
    That does not make him recognized by all. You do understand 'all' and 'most' is different do you not? It is you who is refusing to accept that simple fact. Most people would simply say 'ohyeah I meant most' but nope not you, you'll continue to argue even when you are wrong, pretty pathetic IMHO.
    Maybe the people of the forum are sick of those like you who can not make a point that anyone can understand ;) If this is your way of debating I suggest you find a new hobby.


    Many laws do come from 'religious' based laws as they are in modern day history. That does not make 'murder' a religious law, a christian law from the 10 commandments. With your lack luster logic we are following the laws of every other country where murder is banned, every religion where murder is banned. You seriously are so far off base here I am seriously getting a headache at the mere thought that anyone can be this idiotic.

    ---you do understand even religious based laws came from somewhere, such as 'murder' more than likely was not tolerated before the 10 commandments ;)

    To you it's illegal because of morals, when in fact someone such as myself, someone who truly believes in the constitution believes it's illegal because it hurts someone else, not 'moral'

    I honestly do not understand why anyone would try to hold the argument you are, lay off the Salvia. Maybe it sounds good in your head, it however makes absolutely no sense when typed out on this forum.

    Morals also does not = religion. Or are you saying those without religion are without morals?
     
    GRIM, Apr 19, 2008 IP
  2. ForumFocus.net

    ForumFocus.net Banned

    Messages:
    356
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #102
    And you obviously do not know what a generalized statement is. Just shut up with this. It is getting really tiring and pathetic to have to debate this with you. You are the one that will not admit you are wrong. You are taking general statements for literal statements so just drop it. I am not going to discuss things likes this with you if you are going to keep being like this. You doing this is getting really old.

    I am sorry you cannot understand a simple statement. It makes sense and it is valid and right. If not then PROVE ME WRONG. Do not just say I make no sense. Prove it makes no sense.



    I didnt say all laws did. So yes many laws don't. You cany deny it all you want but you obviously never learned a single thing about government, laws, or society. The primary laws of most societies are based off of religion including America and yes murder is a religiously and moral based law. That is a fact.




    You obviously do not. And question for you since you basicaly just proved me right again in your statement. You said it is ilegal because it hurts somebody else. I wonder why that matters. I will give you a clue. BECAUSE OF MORALS. WITHOUT MORALS IT WOULD NOT MATTER IF YOU HURT SOMEBODY ELSE. IS IT THAT HARD TO UNDERSTAND?



    Never said it did. And no I am not since I am not religious.
    But the whole concept of morals and society was made from religious ideas.
     
    ForumFocus.net, Apr 19, 2008 IP
  3. GRIM

    GRIM Prominent Member

    Messages:
    12,638
    Likes Received:
    733
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #103
    Stating 'everyone' is not a general statement it is trying to convey a fact that is not a fact.

    It's like trying to talk to a toddler, words come out, but with no meaning. It's hard to debate something that is equivalent to mush.


    Really? So murder was not illegal until religion hey? I never learned anything about government, laws or society, that's news to me.



    Actually hurting someone physically and or financially can easily be separated from so called 'moral laws' it's sad you do not see that.



    Absolutely not, religion is not the only reason for morals, nor is religion only about morals.

    :rolleyes:
     
    GRIM, Apr 19, 2008 IP