Farenheit 9/11 now free... What do you peps think?

LMAO you still quoting that old chestnut?

That's about 5 times todays, you getting adsense revenue on that or summat?

 

Fair enough...

ME?? Avoiding Questions??? I cant speak for others, but show me a reference where I avoided a direct question?

 

Still not enough information. can you provide more detailed information about which OBL you are talking about, friend of Bush family, employee of CIA or leader of al qaida?

I have heard all kind of stories, some people claim that it was the OBL who is the leader of al qaida, some people say that it is the OBL who works for CIA and some people claim that it is OBL who is the friend of Bush family and he did it for profit.

I just think that at present time is just too confusing to differentiate among these OBL and we need more information, unless you have a definite proof which one of these OBL is responsible, do you?

 

Blah blah. Not answering the question. Blah blah. Still not answering. Blah blah.

Is this your standard template? I've gotten AGS and AC's down cold. But yours is new. Is that summation accurate enough for you. Would you like another series of "not saying anything bad about terrorists" in there? Something like that?

Or would you like me to close with it "now I'll compare jews to nazis"

Which of those is more amicable to you?

 

Is gworld formulating dishonest questions again? It appears he's trying to defend bin laden again, but isn't quite sure how to do it. gworld...ask AGS, he's an expert at defending bin laden

 

I think gworld is still ashamed of the last time he was upset about a terrorist getting killed and being so obvious about it.

 

I answered your question, I don't know which one of these OBL, friend of Bush family, employee of CIA or leader of al qaida did it. If you have a proof which one was it, I will be more than happy to look at it and learn, do you?

 

How about when your own country does it? Always prepared to lash out at other countries (except those that stone women to death for the crime of being raped).

 

Blah blah. Not answering the question. Blah blah. Still not answering. Blah blah.

I guess you are happy with this one. Let's stick with it. Unless you want to out yourself into believing that "obl is a friend of the bush family" or that "the cia instigated obl to attack" - would you like to go down either of those roads, gworld? If so, please do so. I'm happy to listen to your rantings.

Or you can compare jews to nazis again. Which would you prefer?

 

Yep. Any time one of his buds gets killed, he tends to get upset and lash out at the US, Israel, Christians, Jews, Soldiers (only US and Israeli soldiers though) and of course, dmoz.

It looks as though he's trying to suggest that all of bin laden's family, those that actually disowned him, are terrorists like his unca osama is. It also appears he's trying to perpetuate the myth of bin laden/cia connection like AGS does.

 

Worse yet! Gworld's own government doesn't want a thing to do with their guantanamo detainees.

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2007/03/08/khadrspeaks.html

But gworld would have them over for dinner.

 

Same old tired story, isnt it? Usually gworld would have a problem sentencing the father for the crimes of the son, but not here! Same last name! That's all we need! Kill em!

Then the old/sad/debunked OBL/Cia link that I'm just too bored with too get into again.

 

I wonder if gworld will create another thread seeking sympathy and support for this terrorist, like he did with another al qaida terrorist? He could even try to use the US Constitution to hide behind his support for this Canadian terrorist! If not, AGS might be interested.

 

Indeed, same old tired story. bin laden didn't want anything to do with the "infidels" and was independently wealthy. This is the reason so many of his supporters during that time praised him...because bin laden left his riches behind and lived and fought in the caves with his followers. he used is wealth to buy the weapons, supplies and gear he needed.

The US actually supported the Northern Alliance. The same group that tried to prevent the take over by the taliban in 1994.

But, he'll give his bud's credit to just about anyone these days.

 

Let's see, he has access to a lawyer, his bail has been denied by a judge and a psychiatrist thinks that he is certifiable and danger to his wife and child and you think that this is the same as putting people in prison without charge, access to lawyers or court for indefinite time.

It seem there is nothing illegal about his handling but I still condemn my country action for holding him too long before the trial and this case should have gone to trial much sooner so a court could decide if he should be sent to prison, mental institute or set free.

 

I'm stil waiting for gworld to come up with the ways that jews are like the nazis. Been like 2 days now. He was -so- sure of his claim. Yet nothing. Odd.

 

So now you're saying that you couldn't even be bothered to read the answers to your questions and yet you engage back in this debate without even catching up on what's transpired or reading the information that *you* asked for?

Thanks for proving that my suppositions about you were entirely justified.

 

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,98115,00.html

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/08/15/bergen.answers/index.html

http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=5443

http://www.nationalreview.com/interrogatory/miniter200511030759.asp

 

If you weren't such a moron, you could have read my answer in the same thread. I compared some of the actions by state of Israel with the action of the Nazi government. Are you going to claim now that the thread was too many pages and you don't read it?

My Answer

 

Let's read your post. Page 6 right?

There is a difference between marginalized and destroyed. I'd consult your dictionary if you need help with simple definitions.

The taliban and AQ are fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq with the help of Iran, currently. Also, soldiers come in from Syria, SA, etal to fight as well. Would you support a full invasion of Iran, Syria and other neighboring countries?

I'm not even sure what this has to do with the original point. AQ is, and always has been a multi headed monster. Which goes back to my original point. Doesn it? Killing OBL will not stop terrorism, will it? Nope!

So...thanks for making my point for me here. I appreciate it. Sending in piles of troops after this dude wouldn't have stopped anything. So there is even -more- context to you Bush quote in which you called him a "liar" Isn't it? Would you like to continue that discussion?

AQ has not had a major attack in like 4 or 5 years now. Has it? Isn't this -far- longer than we went during the 90's without a major attack? Would you like me to list all of the attacks during the 90's that were met with nary a response?

All you know is that you are trying to paint a false picture of reality. Killing OBL would not stop anything. He could be dead for all we know. Yet it continues. This is bigger than 1 person, isn't it? It's an ideal we are fighting, not the boogey man.

If this is your main point; then it's seriously flawed isn't it? Both tactically and conceptually.