Faking Clicks

Anyone tried faking clicks to improve postions?

I got my spamming thing up and running. I want to faking clicks on it too. It is a new free info domain. I don't mind trash it or got it banned.

I would say 20 fake clicks per day is pretty good for any site.

Fake clicks on yahoo is easy. On google, it is still doable.

I am still too new to the game. The last time I fake clicks on Alexa, my sites got banned.

 

Im just curios.. How does faking clicks improves search engine positioning???

 

It doesn't, this isn't a toplist qll, it would be totally pointless and impossible for that technique to work. The same sites would remain atop the results if this were the case...

 

ok, you know what i mean. there is only one post about it, and it is not about faking it. but it did guess some ideas. i will follow. what the heck. my site is built to be banned. as long as i cut all links from this spam site to other sites. i think it will be ok.

the index is in google. i am adding all pages on ffa now. so far the index page at at 150-250 out of 500. not bad at all. those porn ffas are good. they will let google index it within 2 days. as long as i am in. everythign else will be my SEO skills.

it is a zero sum game. i win if i am smarter or others are stupider.

 

Uhhhh... huh? What are you rambling about?

 

No, I actually have no idea what you mean...

 

I think you've already lost with grammar like that!

 

Funny forum. There are only few things working, and a lot that does not work. A lot of people are seeking various techniques how "to fake" something.

BTW, I've typed this message with fake pc. I don't know how do you see those characters, I don't know...

 

You really aren't very good are you...

Grow up man. If this is the route you really want to go down, then I suggest that you get good at it before telling everyone about your crap attempts to spam the SE's.

 

I keep thinking Shawn should start banning, this kind of stuff could make the forum look bad

 

This probably why he's keeping Anthony and PRbot apart in the RepRankings.

But regardless...

If you read the various whitepapers on technology that G and others have, you will notice a chapter discussing the technology have which can add weight to a page's ranking according to it's visits or click popularity. So yes, qll could have a good reason to try and pursue this just like all of us are trying to tackle other variables in the algo.

Question remains whether they have implemented it or not. And if they did then it possible has a really small weight so Schlottke's objection doesn't hold true. Nohaber has mentioned setting up a test like this on another forum, to see if clicking through to a 'dead' page will get it back up in the SERPs without any other SEO efforts. I don't know whether this test has been done nor do I know the results.

I believe myself that clicks should come naturally because eventually you will get caught.

 

If you look at the technology involved with this from the positive side than 'this stuff' can be interesting and helping to solve yet again a small (if it exists yet) part of the algo puzzle.

IMO a question like this, no matter how much it might reveal his personlity and tactics, is a lot better than self-promoting spam you see from other people who keep trying around here.

 

I can tell you that qll is talking sh1t. I know this for a fact.

Someone with his kind of attitude 'I can fool any SEO'... Will not be able to get anywhere.

I agree... There are certian people who I would not like to see here anymore. Anthony is not included in that group.

It is not my forum to make decisions with, but you are right debunked... Some of this stuff could make the forum look bad. Especially the cr#p that qll and PRbot talk about.

I don' know. TOPS is right too. At least some of these guys will be able to completly discount some of the known failed SEO tactics that are known of.

 

SE - you are correct and I have enjoyed the openess of this forum. The nice thing about freedom of speach as we have seen it here is that it self regulates. People can ignore the constant crude of a poster if we want. We can argue with a fool or just ignore them and let them argue with themselves - which is fun to watch anyways.

Is someone just keep posting garbage and doesn't chill out at some point then I would really be asking Shawn to ban them. I have not done this for anyone yet - imcluding when Anthony was banned at SEO chat, I was asked to help put in the word to ban by another poster which I did not do, but he was banned anyways.

 

If Anthony were banned, this place would be so quiet and uneventful, well more so any way I love reading Anthony's posts and checking out his cut & paste links. This is indeed a great forum and I think that just having good advise in these moronic threads countering what some bonehead spews out is enough to keep the forum 'looking good'.

 

You're a cool guy Shawn... You have more patience than me when it comes to guys like qll and PRbot (They are the only people I can think of)...

 

Thats because they are the only two people who really irritate everyone. Anthony is alright in my book, but PRBot is a "parasite" and qll is a "cheater" lol.