1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

Faking Clicks

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by qll, Oct 1, 2004.

  1. #1
    Anyone tried faking clicks to improve postions?

    I got my spamming thing up and running. I want to faking clicks on it too. It is a new free info domain. I don't mind trash it or got it banned.

    I would say 20 fake clicks per day is pretty good for any site.

    Fake clicks on yahoo is easy. On google, it is still doable.

    I am still too new to the game. The last time I fake clicks on Alexa, my sites got banned.
    SEMrush
     
    qll, Oct 1, 2004 IP
    SEMrush
  2. digitalpoint

    digitalpoint Overlord of no one Staff

    Messages:
    38,242
    Likes Received:
    2,590
    Best Answers:
    459
    Trophy Points:
    710
    Digital Goods:
    29
    #2
    What exactly are you going to click that you think will affect your Google ranking? :)
     
    digitalpoint, Oct 1, 2004 IP
  3. melfan

    melfan Peon

    Messages:
    644
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    melfan, Oct 1, 2004 IP
  4. schlottke

    schlottke Peon

    Messages:
    2,185
    Likes Received:
    63
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    It doesn't, this isn't a toplist qll, it would be totally pointless and impossible for that technique to work. The same sites would remain atop the results if this were the case...
     
    schlottke, Oct 1, 2004 IP
    SEbasic likes this.
  5. qll

    qll Peon

    Messages:
    195
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    ok, you know what i mean. there is only one post about it, and it is not about faking it. but it did guess some ideas. i will follow. what the heck. my site is built to be banned. as long as i cut all links from this spam site to other sites. i think it will be ok.

    the index is in google. i am adding all pages on ffa now. so far the index page at at 150-250 out of 500. not bad at all. those porn ffas are good. they will let google index it within 2 days. as long as i am in. everythign else will be my SEO skills.

    it is a zero sum game. i win if i am smarter or others are stupider.
     
    qll, Oct 1, 2004 IP
  6. PRBot.Com

    PRBot.Com Guest

    Messages:
    244
    Likes Received:
    40
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    Uhhhh... huh? What are you rambling about?
     
    PRBot.Com, Oct 1, 2004 IP
  7. schlottke

    schlottke Peon

    Messages:
    2,185
    Likes Received:
    63
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    No, I actually have no idea what you mean...
     
    schlottke, Oct 2, 2004 IP
  8. Weirfire

    Weirfire Language Translation Company

    Messages:
    6,969
    Likes Received:
    361
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    280
    #8
    I think you've already lost with grammar like that! :cool:
     
    Weirfire, Oct 2, 2004 IP
  9. xenu

    xenu Peon

    Messages:
    55
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    Funny forum. There are only few things working, and a lot that does not work. A lot of people are seeking various techniques how "to fake" something.

    BTW, I've typed this message with fake pc. I don't know how do you see those characters, I don't know...
     
    xenu, Oct 6, 2004 IP
  10. SEbasic

    SEbasic Peon

    Messages:
    6,318
    Likes Received:
    318
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    You really aren't very good are you...

    Grow up man. If this is the route you really want to go down, then I suggest that you get good at it before telling everyone about your crap attempts to spam the SE's.
     
    SEbasic, Oct 6, 2004 IP
    schlottke likes this.
  11. debunked

    debunked Prominent Member

    Messages:
    7,298
    Likes Received:
    416
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #11
    I keep thinking Shawn should start banning, this kind of stuff could make the forum look bad
     
    debunked, Oct 6, 2004 IP
  12. T0PS3O

    T0PS3O Feel Good PLC

    Messages:
    13,220
    Likes Received:
    778
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    This probably why he's keeping Anthony and PRbot apart in the RepRankings.

    But regardless...

    If you read the various whitepapers on technology that G and others have, you will notice a chapter discussing the technology have which can add weight to a page's ranking according to it's visits or click popularity. So yes, qll could have a good reason to try and pursue this just like all of us are trying to tackle other variables in the algo.

    Question remains whether they have implemented it or not. And if they did then it possible has a really small weight so Schlottke's objection doesn't hold true. Nohaber has mentioned setting up a test like this on another forum, to see if clicking through to a 'dead' page will get it back up in the SERPs without any other SEO efforts. I don't know whether this test has been done nor do I know the results.

    I believe myself that clicks should come naturally because eventually you will get caught.
     
    T0PS3O, Oct 6, 2004 IP
    Ajeet likes this.
  13. T0PS3O

    T0PS3O Feel Good PLC

    Messages:
    13,220
    Likes Received:
    778
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    If you look at the technology involved with this from the positive side than 'this stuff' can be interesting and helping to solve yet again a small (if it exists yet) part of the algo puzzle.

    IMO a question like this, no matter how much it might reveal his personlity and tactics, is a lot better than self-promoting spam you see from other people who keep trying around here.
     
    T0PS3O, Oct 6, 2004 IP
  14. digitalpoint

    digitalpoint Overlord of no one Staff

    Messages:
    38,242
    Likes Received:
    2,590
    Best Answers:
    459
    Trophy Points:
    710
    Digital Goods:
    29
    #14
    Except Google isn't monitoring clicks. You can check this by watching your network traffic when you click.
     
    digitalpoint, Oct 6, 2004 IP
  15. SEbasic

    SEbasic Peon

    Messages:
    6,318
    Likes Received:
    318
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    I can tell you that qll is talking sh1t. I know this for a fact.

    Someone with his kind of attitude 'I can fool any SEO'... Will not be able to get anywhere.

    I agree... There are certian people who I would not like to see here anymore. Anthony is not included in that group.

    It is not my forum to make decisions with, but you are right debunked... Some of this stuff could make the forum look bad. Especially the cr#p that qll and PRbot talk about.

    I don' know. TOPS is right too. At least some of these guys will be able to completly discount some of the known failed SEO tactics that are known of.
     
    SEbasic, Oct 6, 2004 IP
  16. debunked

    debunked Prominent Member

    Messages:
    7,298
    Likes Received:
    416
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #16
    SE - you are correct and I have enjoyed the openess of this forum. The nice thing about freedom of speach as we have seen it here is that it self regulates. People can ignore the constant crude of a poster if we want. We can argue with a fool or just ignore them and let them argue with themselves - which is fun to watch anyways.

    Is someone just keep posting garbage and doesn't chill out at some point then I would really be asking Shawn to ban them. I have not done this for anyone yet - imcluding when Anthony was banned at SEO chat, I was asked to help put in the word to ban by another poster which I did not do, but he was banned anyways.
     
    debunked, Oct 6, 2004 IP
  17. digitalpoint

    digitalpoint Overlord of no one Staff

    Messages:
    38,242
    Likes Received:
    2,590
    Best Answers:
    459
    Trophy Points:
    710
    Digital Goods:
    29
    #17
    What do you think this is, webmasterworld? :) (Even I'm banned there... heh) I'm not going to ban someone just because I don't agree with them or what they choose to discuss.

    So far the only bans that have happened here are people that have registered and posted nothing but 20 duplicate spam threads.
     
    digitalpoint, Oct 6, 2004 IP
  18. mopacfan

    mopacfan Peon

    Messages:
    3,273
    Likes Received:
    164
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #18
    If Anthony were banned, this place would be so quiet and uneventful, well more so any way :) I love reading Anthony's posts and checking out his cut & paste links. This is indeed a great forum and I think that just having good advise in these moronic threads countering what some bonehead spews out is enough to keep the forum 'looking good'.
     
    mopacfan, Oct 6, 2004 IP
  19. SEbasic

    SEbasic Peon

    Messages:
    6,318
    Likes Received:
    318
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #19
    You're a cool guy Shawn... You have more patience than me when it comes to guys like qll and PRbot (They are the only people I can think of)...
     
    SEbasic, Oct 6, 2004 IP
  20. schlottke

    schlottke Peon

    Messages:
    2,185
    Likes Received:
    63
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #20
    Thats because they are the only two people who really irritate everyone. Anthony is alright in my book, but PRBot is a "parasite" and qll is a "cheater" lol.
     
    schlottke, Oct 6, 2004 IP
    digitalpoint likes this.