Editor banned after Shoemoney extortion

And you know that how?

Honestly, gworld has more identities and blind alleys at DMOZ than any of you simpletons are ever going to find, unless he blows a gasket and hands over the information to you directly.

Try thinking for yourself instead of spouting what other editors have fed you. You just might find it enlightening... although I admit from what I've senn from you so far I think it unlikely.

 

Sure. Some here, like Julian is a bully someone needs to stand up to him, that’s a pretty important reason. Some really stupid things get said here, they need to be exposed for what they are.

Yeah, Yeah, Yeah be careful that you don't disagree with Julian you will get accused of being a pedophile. The other day you posted that all Christians are pedophiles, ODP editors are all pedophiles, who else Julian? You a bully...never...

 

Coming from a DMOZ apologist nurtured by RZ, that's almost amusing.

See projection. Under defense mechanisms.

 

I find it strange that for all the times this subject is brought up, not once have you actually acknowledged the situation. To many this is guilt by omission, and you are accepting the roll of a buggerer of children by not standing up against it ...after all, you've yet to even deny it, in fact, in what I've quoted above, you have seemingly embraced it.

I'd like for either of them to actually answer a question or two...I guess they are too busy here on Digital Point or in their children's rooms, doing what good daddies do.

 

So you just defend corruption and "the right" of pedophiles to "free speech" out of goodness of your heart, right?

People can read your defense of pedophiles and how those listings should be kept in the name of free speech in internal forum too. I bet you were disappointed when you lost and your listings were removed.

 

And many things get included in DMOZ. Since they have a closed system and wont let those that disagree in, we need to get the word out the best we can. The corruption, spam, and porn within the ODP needs to be exposed as well. Wont you help us make the directory a better place? Log out of here and log back into the internal forums...help get the ODP back on the proper track. Get yourself some balls and stand up for what is right.

I disagree with him all the time, yet no one has labeled me a pedophile. Though you must also keep in mind, I am not an editor at DMOZ that is here defending pedophilia. Maybe I was wrong to ask you to stand up for what is right... it is clear you don't find anything wrong with child pornography.

 

Who do you think he is Zorro or something? He really aint that clever.

 

Sometimes you are as pathetic as Gworld. "It is clear that you don't find anything wrong with child pornography" is the sort of dumb ass statement one would expect of him. I have never said anything that even hints at being accepting of child pornography.

I get accused of making personal attacks. You are taking that to a new level.

And this crap is even lower than Julain would stoop.

 

Not at all. You clearly do not mind defending child molestors. You clearly do not mind editing for a directory that is happy to list them. You keep not answering the question as to whether you are or are not one. It's not stretch at all to assume you are one.

According to your posting history, calling you a kiddie diddler is not a personal attack, so I guess that is a new level, if you are counting what you seemingly take as a compliment as an attack

 

This is more pathetic crap, if you are think you are going to wind me up are going to fail. I see you have cleverly turned it around from me supporting child molesters to actually asking me if I am one. You know, I think you might be even cleverer than that Julian. No. Of course I am not, but I think you might have known that dearest Qryztufre and you were just trying to make little ‘ol me angry.

 

I was not trying to make you angry at all... just trying to get an answer. I'll take your word for it that you are not a buggerer of babies. Though, I still say that by not standing up against the wrongs of the project, in many ways, you are supporting those wrongs.

 

Christ, how low can you go?

 

What do you mean?

Either you are or are not. You don't get angry when I say you are, but give a reply like that when I say you are not?

I am confused now.

Or are you referring to how I worded it? Heh, having sex with children is having sex with children any way you look at it. I just have been getting bored saying "pedophilia" in every post so I am diversifying the keywords. If you are that offended by such terms, maybe you should see about getting the issues completely cleared from the Directory and maybe step back from defending those that do list such filth. Yeah, I said "buggerer of babies" but at least I'm not defending the links to the people that are buggering them.

 

Oh, really? Well, he's certainly "clever" enough to have survived several attempts by the wizards in the DMOZ inner sanctum to root him out, isn't he?

 

I know what dmoz is and I'm eighteen.

 

That is if he is there at all, which I doubt. But of course as you all keep telling us Adult is full of corruption, so by that definition he would belong there.

And if the personal attacks are a problem remember who accuses me of supporting paedophilia.

Now to that item at the top of Penguin Cafe
"Gworld is going blind"

 

I'm sure he's going to be heartbroken that you don't think he's really an editor. I think you'll find that individuals higher in the DMOZ pecking order than you know it to be true, though.

Speaking of definition, look up "puerile".

Hilarious, Don't give up your day job.

 

Please note people, there was no statement against the corruption, only that someone Anonymously feels is corrupt belongs there.

But then, here I am twisting words...

Do you support DMOZ? If you support it, then you support what it does. Sadly it does promote kiddie porn among other things.

 

How about you tell that to eric? It seems he is worried that may be I fill all the applications for new editors.

 

Julian claims to be an editall, that makes him one of the head peckers.

You know you might be right about him minstrel, he must be quite a guy, being an editall and all he must have made thousands and thousands of edits and really has made his contribution to the directory, then all of the really useful ODP posts here, I can see why you are singing his praises.