Isn't this method basically the same as Angela and Paul's link building methods? I've heard mixed reviews on them myself. Personally I don't see how they could work. They are advertised as PR6-PR9 links but in reality the actual profile where you post the link has no PR at all and may not ever get picked up by Google. I could be wrong though.
It is, but you find your own backlinks, you don't have to wait for the ones they send out, which are spammed to death in a matter of hours, you need to make it get picked up Google, the best way to do this is to post a couple of psots on the forum, it'll get the backlinks flowing to your profile, you only really need to post a few posts (10-30) to get a PR update on a high-PR forum.
The backlinks would be of quite low quality. I still prefer commenting on high pr relevant dofollow blogs. Thanks anyway though.
Yes of course manual is probably the best way to build backlinks, but nearly the fastest, your able to get faster results with automated methods of link building, it's all down to what you want to do with your website and what style of SEO you go with.
In my profile ( and in everyone's profile here at DigitalPoint Forum) in statistics tab the links 1. "Find all posts by Shailendra Mishra" and 2. "Find all threads started by Shailendra Mishra" are actually no follow.. so no search engine will crawl all my posts via my profile.. and thus not all my signatures.
In my experience, profile back link is still powerful as long as this profile got index. It's better if we can automate for creating profile and put link inside the profile. __________________ hair color pictures | bed bugs pictures | pictures of haircuts